Mourners arrive for a burial service of a victim from the March 15 mosque shootings at the Memorial Park Cemetery in Christchurch, New Zealand on Thursday, March 21, 2019. (Vincent Thian | Associated Press)

Mourners arrive for a burial service of a victim from the March 15 mosque shootings at the Memorial Park Cemetery in Christchurch, New Zealand on Thursday, March 21, 2019. (Vincent Thian | Associated Press)

Opinion: New Zealand’s quick action on gun control shames the US Congress

A justified response by politicians.

  • By RICH MONIAK
  • Sunday, March 24, 2019 7:00am
  • Opinion

Less than a week after the mass shooting in Christchurch, New Zealand’s government banned private ownership of semiautomatic weapons and assault rifles. They’ve announced a buyback program that will give current owners “fair and reasonable compensation.” Anyone who doesn’t surrender those weapons to law enforcement authorities could be fined or imprisoned.

This is a justifiable response by politicians who understand that freedom and liberty must be balanced by responsibility to the greater good of society. And it puts the U.S. Congress to shame.

It’s true that New Zealand’s government was able to swiftly enact the ban because the right to bear arms isn’t enshrined in its Constitution. But our Second Amendment doesn’t guarantee the right of Americans to own weapons like the AR-15 used by the gunman in Christchurch.

[Opinion: Do we have a political will for gun control?]

“Like most rights, the Second Amendment right is not unlimited,” wrote Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia in District of Columbia v. Heller. That’s the case which, for the first time in American history, the court ruled “The Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia.” The original constitutional originalist went on to state the ruling doesn’t establish “a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose.” And he acknowledged that “laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms” did not violate of the Constitution.

U.S. Sen. Dan Sullivan, R-Alaska, understands that Congress can prohibit the sale and ownership of the AR-15 and other semi-automatic weapons to private citizens. He knows they can expand background checks to include transfers of ownership at gun shows. Which is why he’ll only make vague references to the Second Amendment whenever there’s a public outcry for enacting such laws.

Like the remarks he made last year to the state legislature after acknowledging the “horrific” Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School shooting act had “scarred the conscious of our nation and catalyzed an important national discussion on school safety.” And that “young Americans across the country who are speaking out” deserved “to be listened to.” He followed with one irrelevant point. Alaskans, he said, “understand how important our Second Amendment rights are” for self-defense and as “a tool to feed our families.”

[High school students say they’ve seen enough shootings]

In a Fox News interview before that, Sullivan was specifically asked about his views on an assault weapons ban. Without mentioning the Second Amendment, he replied that the problem isn’t “legally owning a firearm. It’s who owns them.”

While I agree with his qualification to the second part of that answer — that more needs to be done to prevent mentally disturbed people from obtaining any kind of firearm — the first skirted the responsibility clearly articulated by Justice Scalia. Congress can change the law to make ownership of those weapons illegal.

Sullivan then shifted the discussion to an “issue that never gets talked about … the promotion of violence” in movies and videos. That’s nonsense. Two federal agencies investigated the connection after the Columbine school shootings 20 years ago. Less intensive but similar studies date back to the 1980s.

And it’s been a National Rifle Association talking point ever since the 2012 Sandy Hook school shooting. But that powerful lobby isn’t sincerely addressing the problem. Their strategy is aimed at members of Congress who need to distract the public from the fact the Supreme Court would uphold a ban on “dangerous and unusual weapons” like the AR-15.

Furthermore, the Second Amendment cannot be separated from the objectives stated in the Constitution’s preamble. To “insure domestic Tranquility” and “promote the general Welfare,” it was the founders’ original intent that Congress would use its legislative powers to enact laws just as New Zealand has so responsibly done.

“How much more American blood must we shed before Congress does its job?” President Donald Trump rhetorically asked a few months ago in an Oval Office speech. “To those who refuse to compromise … I would ask, imagine if it was your child, your husband, or your wife whose life was so cruelly shattered and totally broken.”

He was referring to security along our southern border. But the far greater threat faced by law-abiding Americans is that they’ll be in a classroom, movie theater or attending a church service when someone sprays bullets from a legally purchased weapon that Congress could have banned.


• Rich Moniak is a Juneau resident and retired civil engineer with more than 25 years of experience working in the public sector. He contributes a weekly “My Turn” to the Juneau Empire. My Turns and Letters to the Editor represent the view of the author, not the view of the Juneau Empire.


More in Opinion

Web
Have something to say?

Here’s how to add your voice to the conversation.

Lt. Gov. Nancy Dahlstrom addresses the crowd during an inaugural celebration for her and Gov. Mike Dunleavy at Elizabeth Peratrovich Hall on Jan. 20, 2023. (Mark Sabbatini / Juneau Empire file photo)
Opinion: The many truths Dahlstrom will deny

“Now more than ever, we need real conservative leadership in Washington to… Continue reading

A person departs Bartlett Regional Hospital on July 26, 2023. (Mark Sabbatini / Juneau Empire file photo)
Opinion: The importance of a strong, independent community hospital

Juneau’s city-owned Bartlett Regional Hospital (BRH) is in the news, presenting our… Continue reading

(Juneau Empire file photo)
Letter: Disappointed by JAHC director’s opposition to Ship-Free Saturdays

As a member of the Juneau Arts and Humanities Council, I was… Continue reading

Juneau residents pack a room at the downtown public library for a June 6 meeting of Eaglecrest Ski Area’s board of directors. (Mark Sabbatini / Juneau Empire file photo)
My Turn: Eaglecrest unplugged

Serving on a board or commission is hard work and that service… Continue reading

Downtown Juneau in late October of 2022. (Clarise Larson / Juneau Empire file photo)
Opinion: Mitigating the loss of tax revenue from cruise ship free Saturdays

The cruise ship free Saturday initiative presents us with a modified lesson… Continue reading

Leaders at Bartlett Regional Hospital listen to comments from residents during a forum Monday about proposed cuts to some services. (Mark Sabbatini / Juneau Empire)
My Turn: Bartlett board faces challenges

Once upon a time, Alaska’s capital had a well-run municipal hospital, but… Continue reading

(Juneau Empire file photo)
Letter: SEARHC’s goals seem likely to limit, rather than expand, health options in Juneau

Max Mertz’s comments at the Bartlett Regional Hospital public forum about SEARHC’s… Continue reading

(Juneau Empire file photo)
Letter: Allow locals to have their town back once a week during the summer

Perhaps Nate Vallier shrugs when he sees eagles and bears (My Turn,… Continue reading

Former President Donald Trump arrives at Trump Tower after he was found guilty of all counts in his criminal trial in New York on May 30. (Hiroko Masuike/The New York Times)
Opinion: Trump’s new fixers

“Alaska Republicans back Trump after historic conviction in hush money case,” the… Continue reading

A Carnival cruise ship is berthed Juneau’s cruise ship docks during the summer of 2022. (Michael S. Lockett / Juneau Empire file photo)
Opinion: Ignoring the consequences of ship-free Saturdays?

Backers of a cruise initiative to block large cruise ships from docking… Continue reading

Two skiers settle into a lift chair as they pass trees with fresh snow at Eaglecrest Ski Area on Dec. 20, 2023. (Mark Sabbatini / Juneau Empire file photo)
My Turn: Eaglecrest Ski Area attempting to do too much without sensible leadership

Ever wonder what the 50-year-old clearcut above the beginner slopes at Eaglecrest… Continue reading