In this Sept. 11, 2018 photo, the Holland America Line ship Amsterdam sits at port in Juneau. (Michael Penn | Juneau Empire File)

In this Sept. 11, 2018 photo, the Holland America Line ship Amsterdam sits at port in Juneau. (Michael Penn | Juneau Empire File)

Opinion: No harm, no foul with city, cruise lawsuit settlement

The agreement makes clear all past sins, if any, are forgiven.

  • Friday, March 22, 2019 7:00am
  • Opinion

The recent agreement to resolve the long running lawsuit between Cruise Lines International Association (CLIA) and the City and Borough of Juneau (CBJ) was greeted with relief by all concerned.

Announced last week, introduced at a special Assembly meeting the next day, it is scheduled for Assembly approval today.

The lawsuit, filed three years ago, arose from a disagreement over how CBJ spent marine passenger fees collected from cruise ship passengers. After a December court ruling, CBJ decided not to appeal in the belief that negotiation, rather than further litigation, was the wisest course.

What is most striking about the agreement is that the public will see minimal change from previous practices employed by the city. Indeed, the settlement agreement essentially returns the litigating parties to their positions prior to the lawsuit, albeit with less acrimony, added guardrails and a framework to help resolve differences arising in the future.

The agreement makes clear all past sins, if any, are forgiven. Legal expenses, $1.5 million by CLIA and $800,000 in direct legal fees paid to outside counsel incurred by CBJ, have been or will be reimbursed through marine passenger fees.

[As cruise ship lawsuit comes to an end, what’s next?]

CBJ and CLIA jointly acknowledge past passenger fee uses may or may not have survived future legal challenges. But both agree that previously disputed projects and expenses, as well some specified as currently budgeted and planned, can utilize passenger fees, in whole or in part.

CBJ retains local control over downtown marine upland improvements but CLIA may rely on guidelines regarding funding uses. To accomplish this, the agreement delineates two geographic areas in downtown Juneau, Zone A and Zone B, where proposed uses would be considered.

Zone A roughly encompasses marine uplands from the AJ Dock to the Subport. Zone B includes the area from Gold Creek to Douglas Bridge as well as the core downtown area between Main Street and Franklin Street.

Within Zone A, CLIA will not object to and CBJ will be free to propose and budget such capital improvements that further the marine enterprise/operation of cruise ships. Also included are operational services for crew and passengers traditionally provided in the past such as crossing guards, security patrols and general overhead support.

For proposed passenger fee uses within Zone B, CBJ and CLIA agree to discuss these ideas at an annual meeting of the parties.

[Opinion: With cruise ship lawsuit decided, it’s time for Juneau to reap the benefits]

While it’s possible to fund projects or expenses outside these two zones, the agreement implies this would be a rare occurrence subject to mutual agreement and approval by the Assembly.

Astute observers of the agreement will note the relative absence of definitive language. Instead, “shall endeavor” or “shall use their best efforts” or “shall discuss” are used throughout. A paragraph concerning dispute resolution emphasizes “direct discussion” and failing that to proceed to “amicable non-binding mediation.” As a last resort, either party may file suit in U.S. District Court.

The agreement is remarkable in that, despite past litigation, it’s not primarily based on any judicial ruling, rather it is based on mutual recognition of the value of the beneficial relationship between the community of Juneau and the cruise industry.

The industry’s positive economic impact to Juneau cannot be overstated. By 2020, the industry will be directly responsible for an estimated $17 million in marine passenger fees, $11 million in collected sales taxes and over $2 million in property tax. This is in addition to direct economic benefits from related employment, crew spending and cruise line payments for supporting goods and services.

As with any business partnership, there is no legal contract that can prevent its failure if the partners don’t trust and respect each other.

The cruise industry and CBJ both deserve credit for their willingness to consider the needs and priorities of the other and recognize the value each brings to the partnership.

Addressing concerns about impacts of cruise ship visitors requires an honest and collaborative relationship between our community and the industry.

This agreement, in its simplicity, puts the burden on both parties to not only stick to its provisions but also live up to its spirit of cooperation and fairness.


• Win Gruening retired as the senior vice president in charge of business banking for Key Bank in 2012. He was born and raised in Juneau and graduated from the U.S. Air Force Academy in 1970. He is active in community affairs as a 30-plus year member of Juneau Downtown Rotary Club and has been involved in various local and statewide organizations. He contributes a regular column to the Juneau Empire. My Turns and Letters to the Editor represent the view of the author, not the view of the Juneau Empire.


More in Opinion

Have something to say?

Here’s how to add your voice to the conversation.

Greg Smith has served on the City and Borough of Juneau Assembly for nearly one year. (Michael Penn / Juneau Empire File)
Opinion: Finding good stories and inspiration in 2020

By Greg Smith It has been almost a year since I was… Continue reading

Opinion: We are at risk of undermining the foundations of our communities

To address pandemic and climate change, listen to science and mobilize our nation’s resources.

Opinion: A balanced approach is needed for oil tax rates

For the good of Alaska and the future of the state, please vote no on Proposition 1.

People gather for a candlelight vigil for the late Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg near Dimond Courthouse on Saturday, Sept. 19. People shared remarks about some of Ginsburg’s most famous decisions during the event. Some expressed hopes her seat would not be filled until after Election Day. (Ben Hohenstatt / Juneau Empire)
Opinion: Loyalty to Alaska citizens not to the Republican Party, please

This is not a rush decision to be made in a month before election.

Opinion: Panic and lying are the new ‘gold standard’

The pandemic has caused more U.S. deaths in a year than in all U.S. conflicts since the Civil War.

Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg applauds after a performance in her honor after she spoke about her life and work during a discussion at Georgetown Law School in Washington in April 2018. The Supreme Court says Ginsburg has died of metastatic pancreatic cancer at age 87. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon)
Opinion: Honoring RBG’s final wish for Americans

The president and the Congress must honor the will of the people.

Most Read