In this Sept. 11, 2018 photo, the Holland America Line ship Amsterdam sits at port in Juneau. (Michael Penn | Juneau Empire File)

In this Sept. 11, 2018 photo, the Holland America Line ship Amsterdam sits at port in Juneau. (Michael Penn | Juneau Empire File)

Opinion: No harm, no foul with city, cruise lawsuit settlement

The agreement makes clear all past sins, if any, are forgiven.

  • By WIN GRUENING
  • Friday, March 22, 2019 7:00am
  • Opinion

The recent agreement to resolve the long running lawsuit between Cruise Lines International Association (CLIA) and the City and Borough of Juneau (CBJ) was greeted with relief by all concerned.

Announced last week, introduced at a special Assembly meeting the next day, it is scheduled for Assembly approval today.

The lawsuit, filed three years ago, arose from a disagreement over how CBJ spent marine passenger fees collected from cruise ship passengers. After a December court ruling, CBJ decided not to appeal in the belief that negotiation, rather than further litigation, was the wisest course.

What is most striking about the agreement is that the public will see minimal change from previous practices employed by the city. Indeed, the settlement agreement essentially returns the litigating parties to their positions prior to the lawsuit, albeit with less acrimony, added guardrails and a framework to help resolve differences arising in the future.

The agreement makes clear all past sins, if any, are forgiven. Legal expenses, $1.5 million by CLIA and $800,000 in direct legal fees paid to outside counsel incurred by CBJ, have been or will be reimbursed through marine passenger fees.

[As cruise ship lawsuit comes to an end, what’s next?]

CBJ and CLIA jointly acknowledge past passenger fee uses may or may not have survived future legal challenges. But both agree that previously disputed projects and expenses, as well some specified as currently budgeted and planned, can utilize passenger fees, in whole or in part.

CBJ retains local control over downtown marine upland improvements but CLIA may rely on guidelines regarding funding uses. To accomplish this, the agreement delineates two geographic areas in downtown Juneau, Zone A and Zone B, where proposed uses would be considered.

Zone A roughly encompasses marine uplands from the AJ Dock to the Subport. Zone B includes the area from Gold Creek to Douglas Bridge as well as the core downtown area between Main Street and Franklin Street.

Within Zone A, CLIA will not object to and CBJ will be free to propose and budget such capital improvements that further the marine enterprise/operation of cruise ships. Also included are operational services for crew and passengers traditionally provided in the past such as crossing guards, security patrols and general overhead support.

For proposed passenger fee uses within Zone B, CBJ and CLIA agree to discuss these ideas at an annual meeting of the parties.

[Opinion: With cruise ship lawsuit decided, it’s time for Juneau to reap the benefits]

While it’s possible to fund projects or expenses outside these two zones, the agreement implies this would be a rare occurrence subject to mutual agreement and approval by the Assembly.

Astute observers of the agreement will note the relative absence of definitive language. Instead, “shall endeavor” or “shall use their best efforts” or “shall discuss” are used throughout. A paragraph concerning dispute resolution emphasizes “direct discussion” and failing that to proceed to “amicable non-binding mediation.” As a last resort, either party may file suit in U.S. District Court.

The agreement is remarkable in that, despite past litigation, it’s not primarily based on any judicial ruling, rather it is based on mutual recognition of the value of the beneficial relationship between the community of Juneau and the cruise industry.

The industry’s positive economic impact to Juneau cannot be overstated. By 2020, the industry will be directly responsible for an estimated $17 million in marine passenger fees, $11 million in collected sales taxes and over $2 million in property tax. This is in addition to direct economic benefits from related employment, crew spending and cruise line payments for supporting goods and services.

As with any business partnership, there is no legal contract that can prevent its failure if the partners don’t trust and respect each other.

The cruise industry and CBJ both deserve credit for their willingness to consider the needs and priorities of the other and recognize the value each brings to the partnership.

Addressing concerns about impacts of cruise ship visitors requires an honest and collaborative relationship between our community and the industry.

This agreement, in its simplicity, puts the burden on both parties to not only stick to its provisions but also live up to its spirit of cooperation and fairness.


• Win Gruening retired as the senior vice president in charge of business banking for Key Bank in 2012. He was born and raised in Juneau and graduated from the U.S. Air Force Academy in 1970. He is active in community affairs as a 30-plus year member of Juneau Downtown Rotary Club and has been involved in various local and statewide organizations. He contributes a regular column to the Juneau Empire. My Turns and Letters to the Editor represent the view of the author, not the view of the Juneau Empire.


More in Opinion

t
Opinion: Program gives me hope that cycles of family violence can be broken

The program is a holistic family-focused, culturally based counseling/treatment model…

Web
Have something to say?

Here’s how to add your voice to the conversation.

Deven Mitchell greets his fellow members of the Alaska Permanent Fund Corp.’s Board of Trustees at the start of his interview Monday to be the APFC’s new executive director. (Mark Sabbatini / Juneau Empire File)
Opinion: It’s an honor to now lead Alaska’s largest renewable resource

This October, I was provided the opportunity to serve as the Executive… Continue reading

t
Opinion: New to Medicare? Please consider this

Please choose “original” Medicare and avoid the so-called “advantage” plans

The Alaska State Capitol awaits a legislators forming new majority coalitions and the return of Gov. Mike Dunleavy after the winners of the general election were announced Wednesday. The Senate will have a 17-member bipartisan ruling coalition, while the House arrangement remains uncertain due to at least one likely recount and questions about partisan alignments. (Clarise Larson / Juneau Empire File)
Opinion: The rising purple tide in the state Senate

A purple tide threatens to inundate the uncompromising wing of the state Republican Party.

t
Opinion: Giving is for everyone – and the time to act is now

You don’t have to be rich, or prominent, or famous to care about your community…

A roll of “I Voted” stickers await voters on Election Day in Alaska. Voters overwhelmingly rejected the prospect of a state constitutional convention. (Ben Hohenstatt / Juneau Empire File)
Opinion: Election winners, losers and poor losers

Tshibaka and Palin misread Alaskans by thinking Trump’s endorsement all but guaranteed they’d win.

Norwegian Cruise Lines announced in late August that it would donate a 2.9 acre plot of land owned by the cruise line since 2019 on Juneau's waterfront to Huna Totem Corporation to develop. (Michael S. Lockett / Juneau Empire File)
Opinion: Aak’w Landing is Juneau’s most promising new project

Now, more than ever, our community needs the jobs, tax revenue, and stability…

Most Read