Opinion: Don’t let billion-dollar car rental industry ruin a good idea

Opinion: Don’t let billion-dollar car rental industry ruin a good idea

This bill would stifle innovation.

  • Thursday, April 4, 2019 7:00am
  • Opinion

Ever since I’ve been in Alaska, the pundits exclaim that we must figure out how to diversify our economy and find new ways for Alaskans to earn money. Today, I want to point out a prime example of why politics as usual works against economic diversification. To the contrary, as soon as we see a new industry arrive, politicians in Juneau immediately pounce with the heavy hand of government to tax, regulate and snuff out new opportunities. In this case, it’s because the legacy industry is threatened by competition.

I’m talking about an innovative, disruptive business model called peer-to-peer car sharing. I’ve got a car, you need a car. A slick app will connect us and we can make it happen for an agreed-upon price. Whoa, whoa, whoa — that’s way too simple an idea. Have Alaskans found a new way to make a few extra dollars off their idle vehicles?

[Juneau commission urges changes in electric car charging, parking]

As Alaska faces its toughest economic challenges in a generation, and while 7 million Americans are more than three months behind on their car payments, Alaskans have discovered peer-to-peer car sharing. App-based companies like Turo and others allow people to make their privately-owned vehicles available for anyone to reserve through an online marketplace. In turn, car-sharing guests now have a more affordable and convenient option than a traditional rental car company. And with $1 million in liability coverage, it seems like a win-win for everyone in Alaska.

Unfortunately, the big multi-billion dollar, multinational rental car industry doesn’t feel the same way. Rental car companies like Enterprise Rent-A-Car are backing a bill, House Bill 102, in Juneau that would force the peer-to-peer platforms and their car owners to be treated like a rental car company, essentially gutting the entire idea.

With HB 102, the rental car industry puts forth regulations for a competing industry, the one that it views as its biggest threat. Common sense public policy suggests that lawmakers reach out to and work with stakeholders affected by new laws. Yet the Alaska Legislature is allowing these legacy companies to dictate the rules of the road for an industry they simply don’t want to exist.

[Opinion: Make Southeast Alaska America’s 51st state]

Alaska is just Enterprise Rent-A-Car’s most recent playground to strong arm policymakers into preserving their tremendous market dominance — with over 30 similar attempts in other states in the last two years. Enterprise hopes that by enacting HB 102 it will kill the competition and end the threat to its current 56 percent market share. It has the money. It has the connections. But Enterprise is wrong on the issue.

If the state of Alaska wants to put the rules of the road in place for peer-to-peer car sharing, they should work with the participants in that industry — and not the one wanting to wipe it out. Enterprise Rent-A-Car is doing all that they can to stifle innovation, but it’s Alaskans who will end up losing.

Peer-to-peer car sharing is providing economic opportunity for over 700 Alaskans. The average Alaskan host on Turo can make about $300 per month and 1 in 5 Turo hosts are veterans or active military members, many of whom list their vehicles while they’re deployed. We shouldn’t take this opportunity away before it even has a chance to take off.

Please reject HB 102 and invite the peer-to-peer car sharing industry to discuss a proper regulatory framework, without the rental car industry at the table. Let the “Last Frontier” be a voice for technological innovation and economic diversification.


• Erik Scholl lives in Juneau. My Turns and Letters to the Editor represent the view of the author, not the view of the Juneau Empire.


More in Opinion

Web
Have something to say?

Here’s how to add your voice to the conversation.

Opinion: The fortitude of Sen. Murkowski’s conscience

By Rich Moniak Sen. Lisa Murkowski made national headlines for being the… Continue reading

Opinion: Both parties share blame for America’s condition

They live in a swamp of their own making. They need each other to climb out.

Opinion: New help and hop in federal Alzheimer’s legislation

The Improving HOPE for Alzheimer’s Act would help educate clinicians on services through Medicare.

Mendenhall Glacier and Mendenhall Lake in 2017. Significant development is proposed for the area to the left of the glacier’s terminus. (Laurie Craig)
Opinion: Have you seen what is proposed at Mendenhall Glacier?

Many of us spent time this year hiking trails without large crowds. That would change.

Opinion: Can a new spymaster turn around the embattled CIA?

Abused, insulted and threatened for four years by Donald Trump, the CIA is like a battered child.

Opinion: A preserved watershed is more valuable than a developed one

Perhaps we just lived through the “golden years” of out-of-town visitors to the Mendenhall Glacier.

Opinion: We could all use a refresher course in civics

The events of Jan. 6 were only the latest and most extreme illustration of America’s confusion.

Then-Mendenhall Glacier Visitor Center Director John Neary smiles outside the visitor center, May 3, 2019. (Ben Hohenstatt / Juneau Empire File)
Opinion: Forest Service proposal lacks necessary vision

The Forest Service needs to demonstrate solutions that do not burn fossil fuels…

Most Read