My Turn: Climate change is about much more than science

  • By Rich Moniak
  • Friday, December 18, 2015 1:02am
  • Opinion

“This deal puts the fossil-fuel industry on the wrong side of history,” proclaimed Kumi Naidoo, after the world’s leaders reached the climate change agreement in Paris last week. That was a bold prediction for the executive director of Greenpeace International, because neither climate change activists nor science will likely write this history.

Like other the leading activists tirelessly working on the issue, Naidoo wasn’t really declaring victory. The agreement is just “one step on a long road,” he said. There’s a lot more work to do. That includes convincing the majority of Congress and the American people that our love affair with cheap fossil fuels has to end.

“The truth about the climate crisis is an inconvenient one that means we are going to have to change the way we live our lives,” Al Gore said in the award winning documentary “An Inconvenient Truth.” He asks why “some leaders seem not to hear the clarion warnings? Are they resisting the truth because they know that the moment they acknowledge it, they will face a moral imperative to act? Is it simply more convenient to ignore the warnings?”

Both are real reasons why Alaskan politicians say they don’t trust the science. Not only do we rely on oil and coal for heat, electricity and transportation, but it has been funding state government ever since it began flowing down the Trans-Alaskan Pipeline System. We can’t begin to imagine how our already fragile economy will survive if no one wants our oil.

But science itself is part of the problem. The average person can’t be expected to verify their findings. It’s far too complex for most of us to grasp. So for anyone who doesn’t want government dictating how we must live, it’s convenient to trust people who claim there isn’t a scientific consensus or believe most scientists are overreacting to natural global warming.

Naidoo’s statement about the wrong side of history raises another question. Climate change isn’t just about the future actions we need to take. It’s an assessment of our way of life up to this present moment. And many people may be resisting the idea that human activity is responsible for melting the icecaps and glaciers because that also implies a condemnation of how we’ve lived in the past.

The American South provides an example of this kind of denial. The institution of slavery created great wealth for plantation owners. The entire southern economy benefited from it. That all fell on the wrong side of history when the Civil War was lost. But for the next 100 years, the white supremacists who dominated the region couldn’t accept that meaning of defeat. Instead, they found news ways to preserve racial inequality as a central theme to their way of life.

Similarly, the fossil fuel economy gave birth to the country’s much heralded middle class. And within the pages of this national history are millions of Americans whose success stories would lose its luster by admitting they’ve participated in a system that’s been steering the world toward an environmental catastrophe.

Americans have been confronted with this kind of question before. The end of World War II was the beginning of the nuclear weapons age and the possibility of global nuclear destruction. Members of the Science and Security Board of the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists started the Doomsday Clock in 1947. The clock face is still used as a warning signal about the threat of nuclear war. Only now they’ve added climate change as a new global threat to all of humanity.

“Much of human behavior is motivated by an unconscious terror of death,” Boston University professor Jessica Stern wrote in the New York Times following the terrorist shooting in San Bernardino, Calif. And according to something called terror management theory, “when people are reminded of their mortality … they will more readily enforce their cultural worldviews.”

Like the prospect of nuclear war, climate change is asking us to face our own mortality and that of the entire human race. That’s a burden no one wants to carry. And because it evokes an innate desire to trust our way of life, it’s psychologically natural to defend the past and deny the scientific assessments of the threats we face.

Getting past these barriers isn’t a matter of everyone accepting the science. Climate change is an inconvenient truth that challenges the very meaning of life.

• Rich Moniak is a Juneau resident and retired civil engineer with more than 25 years of experience working in the public sector.

More in Opinion

Have something to say?

Here’s how to add your voice to the conversation.

Former Juneau Mayor Ken Koelsch in 2018. (Michael Penn / Juneau Empire file photo)
My Turn: Assembly needs to retreat

We might not be privy to what the Assembly’s agenda is, but… Continue reading

The Stikine River Flats area in the Tongass National Forest is viewed from a helicopter on July 19, 2021. The Stikine River flows from British Columbia to Southeast Alaska. It is one of the major transboundary rivers impacted by mines in British Columbia. (Photo by Alicia Stearns/U.S. Forest Service)
Opinion: Facing transboundary mining, Alaskans shouldn’t buy industry rhetoric

“Rest assured,” writes Michael Goehring, president of the British Columbia Mining Association,… Continue reading

(Juneau Empire File)
Letter: Attorney general’s letter to libraries are an abuse of office

Earlier this month Treg Taylor, Alaska’s attorney general, published a letter to… Continue reading

An aging outhouse overlooks Tenakee Inlet. (Mark Sabbatini / Juneau Empire File)
My Turn: Murkowski’s bill will dramatically change map of public land in Southeast Alaska

There has been very little reporting on federal legislation that would greatly… Continue reading

(Photo courtesy of the City and Borough of Juneau)
Opinion: Choosing a seat at the table

To advocates for limiting cruise ship tourism and combatting climate change, partnering… Continue reading

A photo of Juneau featured on the front cover of this year’s annual “Economic Indicators and Outlook” by the Juneau Economic Development Council. (Juneau Economic Development Council)
Opinion: Troubling trends deserve Assembly attention

The economic indicators report published last month by the Juneau Economic Development… Continue reading

Passengers return to the Norwegian Sun on Oct. 25, the final day of this year’s cruise ship season in Juneau. (Mark Sabbatini / Juneau Empire File)
My Turn: “Partnering” with cruise ship industry isn’t in Juneau’s interests

Regarding Jim Powell’s lecture at the Evening at Egan event on Friday,… Continue reading

Sen. Tommy Tuberville, R-Ala., questions Navy Adm. Lisa Franchetti during a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing on Sept. 14 on Capitol Hill in Washington. (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin)
Opinion: Music to the ears of America’s adversaries

Two weeks ago, U.S. Sen. Dan Sullivan made a commendable effort to… Continue reading

Fog drifts through the trees in the Tongass National Forest on Monday, Dec. 9, 2019. (Michael Penn | Juneau Empire File)
My Turn: A response to ‘There are no Landless Natives in Southeast Alaska’

Where to begin? Rebecca Knight’s — at best implicitly xenophobic and factually… Continue reading

(Juneau Empire File)
Letter: Thankful to see the construction by local Native organiztions

Sitting in my living room listening to nails pounding into the old… Continue reading

Alaska Permanent Fund Corp. board members, staff and advisors meet Oct. 30 at the corporation’s headquarters in Juneau to discuss a proposal to raise the fund’s rate of return by making riskier investments. The idea stalled when advisors suggested the strategy and timing are ill-advised. (Mark Sabbatini / Juneau Empire File).
My Turn: Need for accounting and legislative oversight of the Permanent Fund

The governor or Legislature or both need to conduct an audit format… Continue reading