Opinion: You’re probably a socialist and don’t even know it

Opinion: You’re probably a socialist and don’t even know it

  • By Bill Brown
  • Friday, October 11, 2019 7:00am
  • Opinion

I am a socialist!

OK, I said it. And I suspect that many readers — whether they know it or not — are socialists too, and not just the people who support Bernie Sanders or Elizabeth Warren in the presidential election.

The word “socialism” has many connotations and like so much in our society today, many of those connotations are the product of ignorance. That’s because it’s hard to find a careful discussion of socialism without running off the deep end of Marxism, communism — and liberal Democrats.

Many people, I’m sure, would rethink their views on socialism if they had just a little education. Just a little.

Let’s first recall what we mean by capitalism: In capitalism, the means of production — the factories and farms — are owned by private individuals and sold in a competitive market place. If you make a product that people want, they’ll pay you for it, and your income depends on how much you sell. Of course, even under capitalism, it may be necessary for the government to provide some regulation, but by and large, capitalism is a system of economic freedom: If you provide a good or service that people want, you can sell it and make a living.

Socialism is different, and a bit more complex. To simplify the explanation, let’s talk about two varieties of socialism: Big S Socialism, and little s socialism. Big S Socialism is what many of us learned about in school. It refers to an economic system where the means of production — the factories and farms — are owned by the government. When early socialist philosophers wrote and talked about this sort of economic system, the idea was the state knew what was best for people and could produce the “right” goods and services. We do have a few examples of this sort of socialism in America today: Many communities have state or city owned utility companies. And while there are inevitably complaints that these “socialist” utility companies are inefficient or charge exorbitant prices, the alternative of lots of competitive, capitalist electric companies just doesn’t make sense. But such examples of Big S Socialism are few and far between in the United States. We are an overwhelmingly capitalist country.

The other type of socialism — little s socialism — doesn’t refer to state owned factories. It refers to how people receive the benefits of the economic system. Even under capitalism, some goods and services are distributed based on need instead of ability to pay. For example, early in the 20th century, the United States made the decision that everyone deserved a high school eduction whether they could pay for it or not. Police services are distributed the same way: If you hear a burglar downstairs, you call 911 and expect to have a police officer at your house in just a few minutes. And you don’t need to give the operator your credit card information for payment; you get the benefit of police services whether you have a job and pay local taxes or not. That’s little s socialism, pure and simple.

It’s this little s socialism that has become a hot topic in the election. Neither Bernie Sanders nor Elizabeth Warren are advocating big S Socialism and economic nationalism. But they do feel that our nation could use a bit more little s socialism. Free eduction through community college — advocated by both Sanders and Warren — is an extension to the policy our nation adopted a century ago. And Medicare for All doesn’t mean making all doctors government employees; it means only that medical care is so important that it is better allocated based on need instead of income.

I have no idea who the Democrats will nominate next summer or even whether Trump will survive as long as the Republican convention. But I do know this: Using the term socialism to denigrate people, much less Democratic political candidates, does nothing to help us understand the issues surrounding the 2020 election.


• Bill Brown is an author and a Ph.D. economist who taught at the university level for 23 years. He resides in Juneau. My Turns and Letters to the Editor represent the view of the author, not the view of the Juneau Empire.


More in Opinion

Web
Have something to say?

Here’s how to add your voice to the conversation.

Win Gruening (courtesy)
OPINION: Eaglecrest’s opportunity to achieve financial independence, if the city allows it

It’s a well-known saying that “timing is everything.” Certainly, this applies to… Continue reading

Atticus Hempel stands in a row of his shared garden. (photo by Ari Romberg)
My Turn: What’s your burger worth?

Atticus Hempel reflects on gardening, fishing, hunting, and foraging for food for in Gustavus.

At the Elvey Building, home of UAF’s Geophysical Institute, Carl Benson, far right, and Val Scullion of the GI business office attend a 2014 retirement party with Glenn Shaw. Photo by Ned Rozell
Alaska Science Forum: Carl Benson embodied the far North

Carl Benson’s last winter on Earth featured 32 consecutive days during which… Continue reading

Van Abbott is a long-time resident of Alaska and California. He has held financial management positions in government and private organizations, and is now a full-time opinion writer. He served in the late nineteen-sixties in the Peace Corps as a teacher. (Contributed)
When lying becomes the only qualification

How truth lost its place in the Trump administration.

Jamie Kelter Davis/The New York Times
Masked federal agents arrive to help immigration agents detain immigrants and control protesters in Chicago, June 4, 2025. With the passage of President Trump’s domestic policy law, the Department of Homeland Security is poised to hire thousands of new Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents, and double detention space.
OPINION: $85 billion and no answers

How ICE’s expansion threatens law, liberty, and accountability.

Yereth Rosen/Alaska Beacon
The entrance to the Alaska Gasline Development Corp.’s Anchorage office is seen on Aug. 11, 2023. The state-owned AGDC is pushing for a massive project that would ship natural gas south from the North Slope, liquefy it and send it on tankers from Cook Inlet to Asian markets. The AGDC proposal is among many that have been raised since the 1970s to try commercialize the North Slope’s stranded natural gas.
My Turn: Alaskans must proceed with caution on gasline legislation

Alaskans have watched a parade of natural gas pipeline proposals come and… Continue reading

Win Gruening (courtesy)
OPINION: Juneau Assembly members shift priorities in wish list to Legislature

OPINION: Juneau Assembly members shift priorities in wish list to Legislature

Letter to the editor typewriter (web only)
LETTER: Juneau families care deeply about how schools are staffed

Juneau families care deeply about how our schools are staffed, supported, and… Continue reading

Most Read