Opinion: Why I support the Fair Share Act

Opinion: Why I support the Fair Share Act

Does Ballot Measure 1 benefit the affected people, rather than private “outside” capital interests?

  • Friday, July 24, 2020 12:09pm
  • Opinion

Regarding July 21, 2020, Barbara Haney’s My Turn that Ballot Measure 1 would be “deleterious” to Alaska’s future, my first thought was wow, someone finally sees how eliminating the oil industry has been to Alaska’s Indigenous communities and year-round public residents. Wrong. Root-word here is delete: to wipe out, destroy, eliminate or erase.

[Ballot Measure 1 would be deleterious to Alaska’s future]

Adding the word “public” also has several divisive meanings that indeed delete others for convenience under policymaking. Does Ballot Measure 1 benefit the affected people, rather than private “outside” capital interests? Public also means common, general, popular, vulgar, free-for-all, unrestricted, open rather than restricted. How do Alaskans “equally” fit into the corporate oil scheme?

Vote for which best describes Alaska today in history where people outnumber corporate Wall Street interests. Examine who is who in Alaska’s Legislature and on “our” congressional seats in Washington. It’s self-indicting who is bought and paid for by the dominant rich lobbyists. Very few, in my opinion, are actual public servants.

The Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act, 1971, only came about by industrial discovery of oil in Alaska in the 1960s, or you can bet we would still be fighting for a “just, fair” land claims settlement. Republican-dominated Congress accommodated huge business by placing Indigenous claims settlement into the hands of state banking and securities jurisdiction explicitly for exploitation of Alaska’s vast and beautiful natural resource extraction. The state of Alaska explicitly deletes tribal laws, voices, and historic existence out of the state government because, guess what, the state Constitution does not accommodate for such.

Yet, the millions dollars of Alaska Native capital and acres of Alaska Native land surrounding traditionally used and occupied village-based tribal governments has deleteriously affected Alaska Native health, wellbeing, economy, spiritual and cultural existence. The ANCSA law, and its spawn, Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act 1980, was to belong to the Alaska Native’s toolbox of hard-earned assets. How can we now be the poorest population?

Alaska’s Indigenous ancestors did not sacrifice so much for so many decades to place our people into perpetual poverty. Today, village Alaska suffers the lack of public services at an emergency level as corporate businesses are well provided for to maximum benefit by the state of Alaska. What an insult saying oil revenue “is the lifeblood of Alaska’s economy” rather than off the blood of Alaska Natives. Eliminate. Erase. Delete Alaskans. Minimize the public as policy.

No more of that.

Vote yes on the Alaska Fair Share Act in November.

• Wanda Culp is a Hoonah resident. She is Tlingit and an ANCSA shareholder. Columns, My Turns and Letters to the Editor represent the view of the author, not the view of the Juneau Empire. Have something to say? Here’s how to submit a My Turn or letter.

More in Opinion

Web
Have something to say?

Here’s how to add your voice to the conversation.

A sign outside the Mendenhall Mall directs voters to an early, in-person polling location. (Ben Hohenstatt / Juneau Empire)
Opinion: The facts about our presidential choices

Americans need to vote for the honest, decent family man.

This undated photo shows Dr. Al Gross. (Courtesy Photo / Dr. Al Gross for U.S. Senate)
Opinion: Gross will lead, and Sullivan has failed

Unless he is forced to speak out, Dan Sullivan remains near silent on major environmental challenges.

This photo of a by-mail ballot sent to an Alaska voter in October shows Ballot Measure 2.  (Ben Hohenstatt / Juneau Empire)
Opinion: Elections Should be free, fair and open

By Bruce Botelho Ballot Measure 2 is about ending the influence of… Continue reading

Sen. Dan Sullivan, R-Alaska, testifies during a hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington. Sen. Al Gross, an independent running with Democratic support, is challenging Sullivan in Alaska, a state that has long been a GOP stronghold. Across the country, Republicans are nervous about Senate seats like Sullivan’s they once thought safe as Democrats hope to capitalize on President Donald Trump’s unpopularity to retake the chamber. (Al Drago / Pool)
Opinion: Sullivan has earned my vote

If not for Sen. Dan Sullivan and our congressional delegation, we may have been forced to close.

”I Voted” stickers wait for Alaskan voters to pick them up during early in-person voting at Mendenhall Mall on Oct. 22. (Ben Hohenstatt / Juneau Empire)
Opinion: Sullivan has shown loyalty to party trumps the voices of Alaskan

Alaskans shouldn’t be surprised that it took Dan Sullivan a decade to say he opposes the Pebble Mine.

tease
Opinion: Why I’m choosing Gross again

Now, 25 years later, we are again choosing Al Gross, this time as our candidate for the U.S. Senate.

In this May 7, 2020 photo, Sen. Dan Sullivan wears a mask at a hearing in Washington. Sullivan's office released a statement Monday saying the senator would support a confirmation vote to fill the vacancy on the U.S. Supreme Court even in an election year. (Kevin Dietsch/Pool via AP)
Opinion: Sullivan has earned my vote

Senator Sullivan has a proven record of furthering Alaskans’ need.

Les Gara
Opinion: Voting yes on Ballot Measure 1 is voting yes for Alaska

We should be partners with the oil industry, not junior partners.

Most Read