A statue of William Henry Seward, former U.S. Senator and governor of New York, Vice President and Secretary of State who negotiated the purchase of the Alaska territory from the Russian Empire in 1867 on Tuesday, June 16, 2020. (Peter Segall | Juneau Empire)

A statue of William Henry Seward, former U.S. Senator and governor of New York, Vice President and Secretary of State who negotiated the purchase of the Alaska territory from the Russian Empire in 1867 on Tuesday, June 16, 2020. (Peter Segall | Juneau Empire)

Opinion: Preserve our history, don’t tear it down

“Erasing Seward from our history won’t make our history more fair…”

  • Thursday, June 25, 2020 10:51am
  • Opinion

Calls to take down the statue of William Henry Seward from the Court Plaza across from the Capitol in downtown Juneau accelerated after a petition — directed to Juneau state Sen. Jesse Kiehl and Juneau Rep. Sara Hannan — circulated online.

Citing American imperialism and colonialism as reasons to remove a statue they deem offensive, activists accompanied their demands with pleas for unity, reconciliation, and respect for individual differences.

Will removing or replacing Seward’s statue accomplish this or will it just sow more division and feelings of resentment?

The 6-foot bronze sculpture of abolitionist and Secretary of State William Seward, the work of Ketchikan-based sculptor David Rubin, was unveiled on July 3, 2017. It marked the 150th anniversary of the 1867 purchase transferring Alaska from Imperial Russia to the United States.

As the single most persistent and persuasive voice supporting the purchase, Seward was instrumental in modern-day Alaska’s founding, first as a territory and eventually as our nation’s 49th state. It’s entirely appropriate that he be honored for his role in Alaska’s history and his statue be sited near the state capitol.

There is hardly unanimity of opinion among Native leaders regarding Seward’s legacy.

“Across the Shaman’s River” author Dan Henry wrote that when Seward visited Klukwan two years after the purchase in 1869, he was received with great respect and exchanged gifts with Koh’klux, a fearsome Tlingit leader. Henry writes because of that respect: “…he (Koh’klux} tattooed Seward’s name in his arm…and finally freed his own slaves in 1883, twenty-one years after President Lincoln signed the Emancipation Proclamation.”

Noted Alaskan Native leader, politician, and educator, Willie Hensley, published a 2017 article in Smithsonian Magazine commemorating the Alaska Purchase anniversary saying:

“As the United States celebrates the signing of the Treaty of Cession, we all – Alaskans, Natives and Americans of the Lower 48 – should salute Secretary of State William H. Seward, the man who eventually brought democracy and the rule of law to Alaska.”

Nevertheless, it’s appropriate to call attention to the fact that Indigenous people were neither consulted on the purchase nor immediately granted citizenship in their new country. After many years, this injustice has been acknowledged in a myriad of ways.

In 1945, the advocacy of Elizabeth Peratrovich, a Petersburg-born Tlingit, resulted in the passage of the territory’s Anti-Discrimination Act, the first such law in the United States. Her impassioned testimony before the territorial legislature was considered decisive in its passage when she stated:

“I would not have expected that I, who am barely out of savagery, would have to remind gentlemen with five thousand years of recorded civilization behind them, of our Bill of Rights.”

In 1971, Congress passed the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act. It was the largest land claims settlement in United States history. ANCSA sought to resolve (and provide compensation for) long-standing aboriginal land claims in Alaska.

Today, Alaska Natives populate our Legislature, corporation boardrooms, social and civic organizations and wield considerable political power.

The progress made since 1867 doesn’t diminish the injustices inflicted on Native people which must be part of any fair recounting of Alaska’s history. Nor does it mean we shouldn’t continue to recognize the historical rights and contributions of Alaska Natives.

[Polarizing Petition: Hundreds call for statue’s removal]

But erasing Seward from our history won’t make our history more fair, nor will it advance the cause of Alaska Natives.

Speaking at the Seward statue dedication, Alaska’s first Native Lt. Gov. Byron Mallott, expressed hope for Alaska reaching the potential that Seward envisioned. Mallott speculated Seward would have appreciated the exceptional negotiating skills of Alaska Native tribes when ANCSA was enacted.

“Like the Brooklyn Bridge, Alaska Natives sold Alaska again in 1971 for a bit more than $7.2 million,” Mallott said. “(Our compensation)…was for a billion dollars and 44 million acres of land.”

It’s been suggested that Seward’s statue be replaced by one honoring Elizabeth Peratrovich. Why not commemorate her in an equally visible location — perhaps in front of the Alaska State Museum?

Elizabeth Peratrovich represents a shining example of Alaskans’ determination to eliminate discrimination and establish equal rights in our state.

But elevating Peratrovich over Seward detracts from that message. Each of them occupies a unique place in time in Alaska history.

Both should be preserved.

• Win Gruening retired as the senior vice president in charge of business banking for Key Bank in 2012. He was born and raised in Juneau and is active in community affairs as a 30-plus year member of Juneau Downtown Rotary Club and has been involved in various local and statewide organizations. Columns, My Turns and Letters to the Editor represent the view of the author, not the view of the Juneau Empire. Have something to say? Here’s how to submit a My Turn or letter.

More in Opinion

tease
OpinionL The imperative of reforming national news media

Pandemic coverage is just a springboard to my main subject — the dysfunctional national news media.

Web
Have something to say?

Here’s how to add your voice to the conversation.

1
Opinion: Confused about Ballot Measure 2?

Ballot Measure 2 would make election system complex, obscure and unfair.

Tease
Opinion: Division sabotaged pandemic response

It’s a morality play, now showing in every community including ours

Republican Sen. Dan Sullivan of Alaska sits for an interview Thursday, Aug. 20, 2020, at the Peninsula Clarion in Kenai, Alaska. (Jeff Helminiak / Peninsula Clarion File)
Opinion: Experience and accomplishment beats dishonesty and lack of character

“Sen. Dan Sullivan has earned reelection on Nov. 3.”

tease
Opinion: We face a ‘Robert Frost Choice’

There’s two different moral roads.

teaser
Opinion: Ballot Measure 2 will amplify voices of women and independent voters

By Sabrena Combs This year, the country celebrates the hundred-year anniversary of… Continue reading

Opinion: Let’s look at what Ballot Measure 1 opponents say

It makes no sense to continue to give our resources to Big Oil at bargain prices…

teaser
Opinion: Ballot Measure 1 must be defeated in an historically bad year

We are your neighbors, friends and community leaders. But most importantly, we are voting no.

Most Read