In this Sept. 11, 2018 photo, the Holland America Line ship Amsterdam sits at port in Juneau. (Michael Penn | Juneau Empire File)

In this Sept. 11, 2018 photo, the Holland America Line ship Amsterdam sits at port in Juneau. (Michael Penn | Juneau Empire File)

Opinion: No harm, no foul with city, cruise lawsuit settlement

The agreement makes clear all past sins, if any, are forgiven.

  • By WIN GRUENING
  • Friday, March 22, 2019 7:00am
  • Opinion

The recent agreement to resolve the long running lawsuit between Cruise Lines International Association (CLIA) and the City and Borough of Juneau (CBJ) was greeted with relief by all concerned.

Announced last week, introduced at a special Assembly meeting the next day, it is scheduled for Assembly approval today.

The lawsuit, filed three years ago, arose from a disagreement over how CBJ spent marine passenger fees collected from cruise ship passengers. After a December court ruling, CBJ decided not to appeal in the belief that negotiation, rather than further litigation, was the wisest course.

What is most striking about the agreement is that the public will see minimal change from previous practices employed by the city. Indeed, the settlement agreement essentially returns the litigating parties to their positions prior to the lawsuit, albeit with less acrimony, added guardrails and a framework to help resolve differences arising in the future.

The agreement makes clear all past sins, if any, are forgiven. Legal expenses, $1.5 million by CLIA and $800,000 in direct legal fees paid to outside counsel incurred by CBJ, have been or will be reimbursed through marine passenger fees.

[As cruise ship lawsuit comes to an end, what’s next?]

CBJ and CLIA jointly acknowledge past passenger fee uses may or may not have survived future legal challenges. But both agree that previously disputed projects and expenses, as well some specified as currently budgeted and planned, can utilize passenger fees, in whole or in part.

CBJ retains local control over downtown marine upland improvements but CLIA may rely on guidelines regarding funding uses. To accomplish this, the agreement delineates two geographic areas in downtown Juneau, Zone A and Zone B, where proposed uses would be considered.

Zone A roughly encompasses marine uplands from the AJ Dock to the Subport. Zone B includes the area from Gold Creek to Douglas Bridge as well as the core downtown area between Main Street and Franklin Street.

Within Zone A, CLIA will not object to and CBJ will be free to propose and budget such capital improvements that further the marine enterprise/operation of cruise ships. Also included are operational services for crew and passengers traditionally provided in the past such as crossing guards, security patrols and general overhead support.

For proposed passenger fee uses within Zone B, CBJ and CLIA agree to discuss these ideas at an annual meeting of the parties.

[Opinion: With cruise ship lawsuit decided, it’s time for Juneau to reap the benefits]

While it’s possible to fund projects or expenses outside these two zones, the agreement implies this would be a rare occurrence subject to mutual agreement and approval by the Assembly.

Astute observers of the agreement will note the relative absence of definitive language. Instead, “shall endeavor” or “shall use their best efforts” or “shall discuss” are used throughout. A paragraph concerning dispute resolution emphasizes “direct discussion” and failing that to proceed to “amicable non-binding mediation.” As a last resort, either party may file suit in U.S. District Court.

The agreement is remarkable in that, despite past litigation, it’s not primarily based on any judicial ruling, rather it is based on mutual recognition of the value of the beneficial relationship between the community of Juneau and the cruise industry.

The industry’s positive economic impact to Juneau cannot be overstated. By 2020, the industry will be directly responsible for an estimated $17 million in marine passenger fees, $11 million in collected sales taxes and over $2 million in property tax. This is in addition to direct economic benefits from related employment, crew spending and cruise line payments for supporting goods and services.

As with any business partnership, there is no legal contract that can prevent its failure if the partners don’t trust and respect each other.

The cruise industry and CBJ both deserve credit for their willingness to consider the needs and priorities of the other and recognize the value each brings to the partnership.

Addressing concerns about impacts of cruise ship visitors requires an honest and collaborative relationship between our community and the industry.

This agreement, in its simplicity, puts the burden on both parties to not only stick to its provisions but also live up to its spirit of cooperation and fairness.


• Win Gruening retired as the senior vice president in charge of business banking for Key Bank in 2012. He was born and raised in Juneau and graduated from the U.S. Air Force Academy in 1970. He is active in community affairs as a 30-plus year member of Juneau Downtown Rotary Club and has been involved in various local and statewide organizations. He contributes a regular column to the Juneau Empire. My Turns and Letters to the Editor represent the view of the author, not the view of the Juneau Empire.


More in Opinion

Web
Have something to say?

Here’s how to add your voice to the conversation.

Google Maps screenshot
The star shows the approximate location of the proposed Cascade Point Ferry terminal by the Alaska Department of Transportation & Public Facilities in partnership with Goldbelt, Inc.
Opinion: An open letter to Cascade Point ferry terminal proponents

To: Governor Dunleavy, DOT Directors, and Cascade Point ferry terminal project consultants,… Continue reading

My Turn: Supreme Court decision treats Alaskans with mental illness worse than criminals

A criminal in Alaska who’s in custody must be presented with charges… Continue reading

Win Gruening (courtesy)
Gratitude for our libraries, museums and historians

The thanksgiving weekend is a chance to recognize those who preserve local history

Google Maps screenshot 
The star shows the approximate location of the proposed Cascade Point Ferry terminal by the Alaska Department of Transportation & Public Facilities in partnership with Goldbelt, Inc.
My Turn: Cascade Point terminal would not be efficient

I have enjoyed traveling on the Alaska State Ferries over the years… Continue reading

photo by Peter W. Stevenson / The Washington Post 
President Donald Trump on Oct. 24.
Opinion: ‘Hang them,’ Trump said

A president’s threat against Congress and the duty of Alaska’s delegation.

Telephone Hill as seen from above. (photo courtesy of City and Borough of Juneau)
My Turn: Telephone Hill Concept C vs Concept D – could we see Pro Forma?

It is standard that before a municipality undertakes a construction project for… Continue reading

Sen. Dan Sullivan, R-Alaska, speaks during a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing on Capitol Hill on March 7 in Washington. (AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster)
Opinion: Senator Sullivan supports $500,000 Grift

A hidden clause in Congress’s spending bill turns public service into personal profit.

Win Gruening (courtesy)
Opinion: Sen. Dan Sullivan – promises made, promises kept

The senator has promised and delivered on red-tape slashing solutions

U.S. Rep. Nick Begich III, R-Alaska, addresses a joint session of the Alaska Legislature. (Mark Sabbatini file photo)
My Turn: Sullivan and Begich Will Lose in 2026

Supporting Trump’s Agenda Is Highly Unpopular… Even in Alaska

The star shows the approximate location of the proposed Cascade Point Ferry terminal by the Alaska Department of Transportation & Public Facilities in partnership with Goldbelt, Inc. (Google Maps screenshot)
My Turn: The case against Cascade Point Ferry Terminal

I am writing to say that I think the State of Alaska’s… Continue reading

File photo, Tierney L. Cross/The New York Times
The marble statue depicting “The Authority of Law” is visible outside the Supreme Court in Washington on Monday, Oct. 6, 2025.
My Turn: The Supreme Court is creating dictatorship in the shadows

Van Abbott weighs in on quiet power of the judiciary branch.