The Tongass National Forest sign stands near the Auke Village Recreation Area. (Juneau Empire File)

The Tongass National Forest sign stands near the Auke Village Recreation Area. (Juneau Empire File)

Opinion: I hope inclusion of the Tongass under the Roadless Rule is maintained

  • Monday, November 18, 2019 12:19pm
  • Opinion

I retired at the end of March after 28 years as a research social scientist with the USDA Forest Service. Over the course of my public service with the Forest Service, I worked directly with communities to build relationships and encourage civic engagement and collaboration to reduce fire risk in Washington and Oregon, publicize health benefits of spending time in nature and facilitate climate change mitigation and adaptation in coastal Alaska.

The focus across my entire career was to build positive, productive relationships and engage communities in shared research and management efforts in support of our national forests.

Unfortunately, the Alaska Region of the Forest Service is backtracking on agreements for management of the Tongass National Forest. A management plan for the Tongass, developed through an extensive public engagement and comment process, is being scrapped. Community leaders trusted the agency to follow through with the management plan developed through a collaborative effort that engaged all interests.

By reopening the planning process and threatening once again to remove the Tongass from inclusion under the Roadless Rule, the agency is betraying the many partners who participated in extensive past planning efforts. I hate to see the agency discard and disregard the agreements that so many have contributed to implementing.

Why should people trust the agency if this is the way they choose to proceed?

As several others have commented, continuing to pursue large timber sales on the Tongass National Forest makes no sense economically, socially or environmentally. The intact forest is far more valuable than the forest products that could be harvested. Logging results in a loss to the U.S. taxpayer.

Studies have estimated that taxpayers subsidize the Tongass timber program in excess of $20 million per year, or about $130,000 per timber job and despite all the tax dollars spent propping up the industry, the timber industry currently contributes less than 1 percent to local economies.

I hope sound minds prevail, outcomes of past public engagement are respected and the inclusion of the Tongass under the Roadless Rule is maintained.


• Linda Kruger retired in March after 28 years as a research social scientist for the USDA Forest Service working for the PNW Research Station in Seattle 1991-2003 and at the Juneau Forestry Sciences Lab from 2003-2019. She served the State of Alaska, Department of Natural Resources as a park ranger and Southeast regional manager for Alaska State Parks and Outdoor Recreation from 1976-1989.

Columns, My Turns and Letters to the Editor represent the view of the author, not the view of the Juneau Empire.


More in Opinion

teaser
Opinion: Voter suppression or election integrity?

Georgia’s recently passed voting law addresses perfectly rational concerns about election security.

Teaser
Opinion: We do not have another decade to waste without protecting every Alaskan

Let’s end the cruel, and inhumane legal discrimination against our fellow Alaskans

Web
Have something to say?

Here’s how to add your voice to the conversation.

(Michael Penn / Juneau Empire File)
Opinion: A campaign for Alaska

By Sheri Buretta and Cynthia Cartledge The University of Alaska is focused… Continue reading

A sign along Montana Creek Road encourages Juneau residents to wear face masks in public settings on Dec. 29. (Ben Hohenstatt / Juneau Empire File)
Opinion: Motorized use would disturb Montana Creek area

By Mary F. Willson Montana Creek is a beautiful clear-water stream that… Continue reading

A role of "I Voted" stickers sit sanitizer. (Ben Hohenstatt / Juneau Empire File)
Opinion: There’s a problem election reform efforts are ignoring

Campaigns should be shorter. But they aren’t.

This screenshot of an Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation map of PFAS sites in Alaska shows that contamination from so-called “forever chemicals” is observable throughout the state. (Screenshot | Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation)
Opinion: Alaska needs to do more to ensure safe drinking water

Most of all, we need action at the local, state, and federal levels.

Teaser
Opinion: How satellites may lead to broadband service for rural Alaska

Low Earth orbiting satellites may soon help Alaska to achieve a task force goal.

Most Read