Pins supporting the repeal of ranked choice voting are seen on April 20, 2024, at the Republican state convention in Anchorage. (James Brooks/Alaska Beacon)

Pins supporting the repeal of ranked choice voting are seen on April 20, 2024, at the Republican state convention in Anchorage. (James Brooks/Alaska Beacon)

My Turn: Juneau doesn’t need ranked choice voting

Save taxpayer money and reject ranked choice voting

  • By Murray R. Walsh
  • Saturday, September 20, 2025 10:30am
  • Opinion

The Juneau Assembly wants to use ranked choice voting for city elections? This on top of vote by mail? No! Each of these systems has the effect of diminishing the value of our shared civic responsibility and distancing the voter from the counting process. They both add unnecessary delay in announcing election results. Ranked choice at the state level adds two or three weeks to reveal results. People are suspicious about what happens during these long counting processes. Each adds more cost to run an election. The city invested $700,000 in a facility just to deal with vote by mail. Nothing has been disclosed about the cost of adding ranked choice to this mess.

A lot of people were unhappy enough with vote by mail that a petition to remove it came within 15 signatures of qualifying for the next city election. I would not be surprised if those people try again for 2026. Two other petitions DID qualify: a cap on property tax mill rate and removal of sales tax on food. You will be able to vote on those two issues this fall. You will NOT be able to vote on the ranked choice question. The Assembly can do this on their own authority.

The ranked choice issue is whirling on a statewide basis and I wrote about it on these pages last month. We are still gathering signatures and with luck, we will be able to vote to repeal it, again, statewide, in the fall of 2026. I sure hope we don’t have to do the same thing at the city level. But please, be careful not to confuse the state-level ranked choice matter with the local ranked choice issue. Both are bad but each is following a different path.

Why should you care about these dramatic revisions to our election systems? Well, the main reason is that they don’t produce the benefits that their proponents claim they will. Both ranked choice and vote by mail are touted as increasing voter participation. They don’t. In the case of vote by mail in Juneau, consider this: The average voter turnout in the five city elections from 2015 to 2019 was 30.4%. In 2020 it was 42.7%. In 2021, the first year vote by mail was implemented, turnout dropped yes, dropped! to 30.8% and it didn’t get much higher after that until 2024 when it was up to 38.7%. Vote by mail does not drive voter turnout, passion does.

In 2020 two Assembly seats were hotly contested and there was a well-organized campaign to vote against creating a commission to review the city charter. In 2024 there was a competitive race for mayor and a controversial city hall bond issue. Plenty of passion on both. I think the electorate was fairly content with how things had been running during the 2010-2019 period and that substantial discontent began with vote by mail in 2020 and continues to this day.

Vote by mail was also touted as making elections more accessible to people that were homebound, had mobility problems, or were out of town during the election season. There was already a system for obtaining an absentee ballot in place. The voter had to request it, but the system was there and it was fair.

The primary reason for opposing ranked choice voting and vote by mail is that they reduce public confidence in the credibility and integrity of the election system. As I said at the beginning, both systems put barriers between the voter and the tabulation process; both delay the results; and both impede the public visibility needed to assure election integrity.

I am not saying that the inventors and proponents of vote by mail and ranked choice voting intended these negative effects. I am sure their intentions were noble enough but are frankly grounded in a naïve sense of being part of some think-tank inspired movement to improve elections. Both vote by mail and ranked choice voting are derived from academic and aristocratic sources and smell of contempt for the voter. Please tell your Assembly members to save taxpayer money and not adopt ranked choice voting. Juneau just doesn’t need it.

Murray R. Walsh is a retired land use consultant in Juneau.

More in Opinion

Web
Have something to say?

Here’s how to add your voice to the conversation.

Doug Mills/The New York Times 
President Donald Trump disembarks the USS Harry S. Truman before delivering remarks for the Navy’s 250th anniversary in Norfolk, Va., Oct. 5, 2025.
Opinion: Trump’s job is done

The ultra-rich have completed their takeover of America.

Google Maps screenshot
The star shows the approximate location of the proposed Cascade Point Ferry terminal by the Alaska Department of Transportation & Public Facilities in partnership with Goldbelt, Inc.
Opinion: An open letter to Cascade Point ferry terminal proponents

To: Governor Dunleavy, DOT Directors, and Cascade Point ferry terminal project consultants,… Continue reading

My Turn: Supreme Court decision treats Alaskans with mental illness worse than criminals

A criminal in Alaska who’s in custody must be presented with charges… Continue reading

Win Gruening (courtesy)
Gratitude for our libraries, museums and historians

The thanksgiving weekend is a chance to recognize those who preserve local history

Google Maps screenshot 
The star shows the approximate location of the proposed Cascade Point Ferry terminal by the Alaska Department of Transportation & Public Facilities in partnership with Goldbelt, Inc.
My Turn: Cascade Point terminal would not be efficient

I have enjoyed traveling on the Alaska State Ferries over the years… Continue reading

photo by Peter W. Stevenson / The Washington Post 
President Donald Trump on Oct. 24.
Opinion: ‘Hang them,’ Trump said

A president’s threat against Congress and the duty of Alaska’s delegation.

Telephone Hill as seen from above. (photo courtesy of City and Borough of Juneau)
My Turn: Telephone Hill Concept C vs Concept D – could we see Pro Forma?

It is standard that before a municipality undertakes a construction project for… Continue reading

Sen. Dan Sullivan, R-Alaska, speaks during a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing on Capitol Hill on March 7 in Washington. (AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster)
Opinion: Senator Sullivan supports $500,000 Grift

A hidden clause in Congress’s spending bill turns public service into personal profit.

Win Gruening (courtesy)
Opinion: Sen. Dan Sullivan – promises made, promises kept

The senator has promised and delivered on red-tape slashing solutions

U.S. Rep. Nick Begich III, R-Alaska, addresses a joint session of the Alaska Legislature. (Mark Sabbatini file photo)
My Turn: Sullivan and Begich Will Lose in 2026

Supporting Trump’s Agenda Is Highly Unpopular… Even in Alaska

The star shows the approximate location of the proposed Cascade Point Ferry terminal by the Alaska Department of Transportation & Public Facilities in partnership with Goldbelt, Inc. (Google Maps screenshot)
My Turn: The case against Cascade Point Ferry Terminal

I am writing to say that I think the State of Alaska’s… Continue reading