My Turn: It isn’t about winning

  • By Rich Moniak
  • Friday, March 25, 2016 1:02am
  • Opinion

I’m predicting Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders will take Alaska’s Democrat caucus on Saturday. Most political analysts think it doesn’t matter though since Hillary Clinton has an insurmountable lead in the delegate count. However, Sanders should stay in the race to the end because winning isn’t as important as fighting for one’s cherished ideals.

Sanders’ campaign has been focused on ending what he calls a rigged economy. “The top one percent now owns more wealth than the bottom 90 percent” he said in a December 2010 filibuster against extending the Bush tax cuts. “That is not the foundation of a democratic society. That is the foundation for an oligarchic society. The rich get richer. The middle class shrinks. Poverty increases.”

That speech helped propel the relatively unknown democratic socialist onto the national stage. Now his surprisingly successful campaign has forced Clinton to sound like an economic populist, too. This month she spoke about a “new bargain for a new economy” in which she admitted that “part of the problem is a casino culture on Wall Street” and “no bank can be too big to fail and no executive too powerful to jail.”

Clinton’s partial makeover is reminiscent of Mitt Romney’s 2012 campaign for the GOP nomination. He had to work to convince the GOP party base that he was a true conservative.

Well, Clinton isn’t a true liberal. Her record on economic issues is much closer to the political center. So are her foreign policy positions. But what concerns Sanders supporters is whether or not Clinton will continue their fight against the policies favoring big banks and Wall Street if she’s elected president.

In another country Sanders would be representing the interests of the working class in an entirely separate Democratic Socialist party. If environment stewardship is your passion, you’d probably have a legitimate Green Party candidate to back. On the right, there might be conservative Christian and Libertarian parties vying for your support.

Novelist Lionel Shriver captured the shortcomings of our two-party system in a New York Times opinion piece early last month. She described her primary political beliefs as libertarian and would have supported Sen. Rand Paul if he were still in the race. But his positions only “minimally” align with her values. She’s also pro-choice, endorses same-sex marriage, prefers single-payer health care and opposes school prayer. And she’s leaning Democrat without Paul in the race.

“The socially progressive economic conservative in America has long been disenfranchised,” Shriver wrote, and added, “A true foreign-policy conservative is equally at a loss.”

To some extent she’s describing a major a source of public apathy that’s reflected in voter turnout. In our self-proclaimed beacon of democracy, half us routinely sit out national elections. Compare that to the two-thirds to 90 percent of the public that votes in countries with four or more parties.

Factor in the anti-establishment mood powering Sanders, Donald Trump and Ted Cruz this year. Among the 50 percent who faithfully vote are many people clearly fed up with both parties. A lot of that has to do with the impact people are feeling from the policies they’ve implemented. But all three candidates are running on the theme that they’ll fight harder and longer for the causes they’ve taken up.

So for a moment, I want to reimagine the purpose of elections to be a demonstration of our most passionate set of beliefs. That lets me improvise on a philosophy espoused by the renowned poet Wendell Berry. He says what motivates us to protest shouldn’t be public success, which, when applied to elections, is pinning our hopes on our candidate winning. Rather, it should be to preserve the “qualities in one’s own heart and spirit that would be destroyed by acquiescence.”

In other words, regardless of whether a candidate like Sanders can win, we should be fighting for the ideals we cherish because it’s the right thing to do. Winning is secondary. That not only means we should stay in the political ring long after the votes have been tallied, it suggests that if we had more than two parties to keep the many different torches lit, more people might remain engaged in our democracy.

What the anti-establishment vote is really saying is that if government it broken, it’s the two parties that have done the damage. They’ve not just neglected the plight of too many Americans. They’ve never intended to be the champion of everything on their platforms. Win or lose, fighting for the many ideals left out is our never ending responsibility.

• Rich Moniak is a Juneau resident and retired civil engineer with more than 25 years of experience working in the public sector.

More in Opinion

Web
Have something to say?

Here’s how to add your voice to the conversation.

From left, Senators Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) and Susan Collins (R-Maine) head to the Senate chamber at the Capitol in Washington on Tuesday morning, July 1, 2025. Senate Republicans were racing on Tuesday morning to lock down the votes to pass their sweeping tax and domestic police bill, after an all-night session of voting and negotiating with holdouts left Trump’s agenda hanging in the balance. (Tierney L. Cross/The New York Times)
My Turn: Murkowski’s moment of shame

She has no excuse for not following the model Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., set when he killed Joe Biden’s biggest initiative in 2021.

Gov. Mike Dunleavy speaks about his decision to veto House Bill 57 during a press conference at the Alaska State Capitol on Monday, May 19, 2025. (Jasz Garrett / Juneau Empire file photo)
Opinion: Governor deposits a veto to help predatory lenders

Thousands of Alaskans get so squeezed on their finances every year that… Continue reading

Deven Mitchell is the executive director and chief executive officer of the Alaska Permanent Fund Corp. (Photo courtesy of the Alaska Permanent Fund Corp.)
Opinion: The key to a stronger fund: Diversification

Diversification is a means of stabilizing returns and mitigating risk

The Tongass National Forest sign seen en route to the Mendenhall Glacier Visitor Center on Wednesday, Aug. 28, 2019. (Michael Penn / Juneau Empire File)
Opinion: Environmentalists without an honest cause

I took a little liberty with their statement because they took a lot of liberty with the facts.

A Juneau Police Department vehicle patrols a neighborhood near Juneau International Airport after warning a person camped along the side of the road they need to move their campsite on Saturday, May 24, 2025. (Mark Sabbatini / Juneau Empire file photo)
Opinion: Homeless, not helpless — Part 2

In January 2017, I penned a My Turn entitled “Homeless Not Helpless”… Continue reading

In this June 23, 2016, photo, the Alaska Marine Highway ferry Matanuska passes Eagle Glacier. (Michael Penn / Juneau Empire File)
More competitive wages will shore up AMHS workforce

The Alaska Marine Highway System provides transportation along thousands of miles of… Continue reading

(Juneau Empire file photo)
Opinion: Life is harder when you outlive your support group

Mom was ready to die, knowing the world would be OK. Or so she thought.

Participants in “No Kings” protest walk down Egan Drive waving an American flag on Saturday, June 14, 2025 (Natalie Buttner / Juneau Empire)
Opinion: Why we protest

Along with more than a thousand other Juneauites, I attended the “No… Continue reading

(Juneau Empire file photo)
Letter: Public broadcasting is part of the fabric of Alaska’s rural communities

Public broadcasting forms an essential part of the fabric of Alaska’s rural… Continue reading

Members of the Yées Ḵu.oo Dance Group perform at the Cancer Survivors Day walk on Sunday, June 8, 2025, at Overstreet Park. (Ellie Ruel / Juneau Empire file photo)
Letter: Thank you

Each June, people around the world commemorate National Cancer Survivors Day. Cancer… Continue reading

U.S. Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, Jan. 24, 2025. (Tom Brenner / The New York Times)
My Turn: But wait a minute, if…

I thought it might be worthwhile to add some historical perspective to… Continue reading