Executive privilege vs. privilege of public service

  • By Rich Moniak
  • Sunday, September 24, 2017 7:24am
  • Opinion

It was an act of generosity heard around the nation. The US News and World Report carried the story. As did the small towns of Hastings, Nebraska and Bristol, Virginia. But for University of Alaska President Jim Johnsen, donating his performance bonus back to UA programs was nothing special. He did the same thing last year, his first at the helm of the state’s public university.

“People don’t go into higher education — I didn’t go into higher education — to get rich,” Johnsen said a few days earlier when discussing UA’s search for a Vice Chancellor of Administrative Affairs. “I was making a lot more money in the private sector than I make here.”

It’s true Johnsen can earn more elsewhere. But with an annual salary of $325,000, he’s the highest paid employee on the state’s payroll. That’s more than 98 percent of Americans make. And what he earned as a senior vice-president with Alaska Communications already made him rich.

That said, his unselfish act should still embarrass most of his public university peers.

But not all. So I’ll start with one of the few exceptions.

From 2012 to 2106, Santa Ono was president of the University of Cincinnati. Just days before Johnsen was hired to run UA, Ono was awarded a $200,000 bonus. But as he had done every year of his tenure, he gave it to a variety of education programs and scholarship funds.

Without the bonus though, Ono still earned exactly that much more than Johnsen.

What draws these salaries into and above the top two percent is key to understanding how free market forces are undermining the meaning of public service.

In 1998, Gen. Mark Hamilton (Ret) became UA’s eleventh president. His salary was $148,000. It rose to $370,000 by the time he left in 2010. That’s five times more than rate of inflation.

The increasing fortune Hamilton earned in those 12 years followed a nationwide trend. Executive salaries at public universities rose precipitously to keep pace with the level of increases at private schools. And those were an attempt to match an even steeper rise in CEO compensation across America.

Simply put, corporate management had created an inflationary pressure uniquely enriching to itself. And it trickled down to the point where, to attract quality candidates, public institutions had to follow suit.

That’s partly why UA’s Board of Regents could entice Johnsen to consider the job. With a PhD in higher education management and 22 prior years at UA, he certainly had the credentials. But he might not have applied had it paid only $215,000 — the amount it would have been if the entry level salary Hamilton accepted in 1998 had, like most jobs in America over the last 35 years, risen commensurate with the rate of inflation.

But there’s a more important value at work here. Money is not Johnsen’s primary motivator. He seems to have a genuine appreciation for the honor of serving the public good.

That’s not the same as executive privilege, which is what Gov. Chris Christie (R-NJ) thought he was owed when, a day after he shut down state government and closed Island Beach State Park, he used taxpayer money for a helicopter to fly there and enjoy a day on the beach. “That’s the way it goes” he said, in response to widespread criticism. “Run for governor, and you can have the residence,” a reference to the state-owned beach house where his family was staying despite the fact he ordered every other family with homes at the park to leave until the government reopened.

It’s worth noting that, during our own budget crisis, Gov. Bill Walker voluntarily cut his pay by 35 percent. That’s the kind of selfless leadership we want from public servants.

Johnsen is giving us that. But if he’s the rare exception, many of the most qualified candidates will be looking to the private sector for help climbing the ladder of wealth.

That’s got to give UA’s Board of Regents an intense migraine every time they have to fill an executive staff position. It’s why three of those, currently staffed with interim appointments, are among the top 10 highest paid positions on the state’s payroll.

And if you think that’s a problem, blame the unchecked greed of corporate America for leading the way.


• Rich Moniak is a Juneau resident and retired civil engineer with more than 25 years of experience working in the public sector. He contributes a regular column to the Juneau Empire.


More in Opinion

Web
Have something to say?

Here’s how to add your voice to the conversation.

Win Gruening (courtesy)
OPINION: Eaglecrest’s opportunity to achieve financial independence, if the city allows it

It’s a well-known saying that “timing is everything.” Certainly, this applies to… Continue reading

Atticus Hempel stands in a row of his shared garden. (photo by Ari Romberg)
My Turn: What’s your burger worth?

Atticus Hempel reflects on gardening, fishing, hunting, and foraging for food for in Gustavus.

At the Elvey Building, home of UAF’s Geophysical Institute, Carl Benson, far right, and Val Scullion of the GI business office attend a 2014 retirement party with Glenn Shaw. Photo by Ned Rozell
Alaska Science Forum: Carl Benson embodied the far North

Carl Benson’s last winter on Earth featured 32 consecutive days during which… Continue reading

Van Abbott is a long-time resident of Alaska and California. He has held financial management positions in government and private organizations, and is now a full-time opinion writer. He served in the late nineteen-sixties in the Peace Corps as a teacher. (Contributed)
When lying becomes the only qualification

How truth lost its place in the Trump administration.

Jamie Kelter Davis/The New York Times
Masked federal agents arrive to help immigration agents detain immigrants and control protesters in Chicago, June 4, 2025. With the passage of President Trump’s domestic policy law, the Department of Homeland Security is poised to hire thousands of new Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents, and double detention space.
OPINION: $85 billion and no answers

How ICE’s expansion threatens law, liberty, and accountability.

Yereth Rosen/Alaska Beacon
The entrance to the Alaska Gasline Development Corp.’s Anchorage office is seen on Aug. 11, 2023. The state-owned AGDC is pushing for a massive project that would ship natural gas south from the North Slope, liquefy it and send it on tankers from Cook Inlet to Asian markets. The AGDC proposal is among many that have been raised since the 1970s to try commercialize the North Slope’s stranded natural gas.
My Turn: Alaskans must proceed with caution on gasline legislation

Alaskans have watched a parade of natural gas pipeline proposals come and… Continue reading

Win Gruening (courtesy)
OPINION: Juneau Assembly members shift priorities in wish list to Legislature

OPINION: Juneau Assembly members shift priorities in wish list to Legislature

Letter to the editor typewriter (web only)
LETTER: Juneau families care deeply about how schools are staffed

Juneau families care deeply about how our schools are staffed, supported, and… Continue reading

Most Read