Assembly Mining Committee begins public process

  • By WIN GRUENING
  • Friday, February 23, 2018 8:15am
  • Opinion

The newly formed Assembly Mining Committee (AMC) will be accepting oral comments on the draft revision of City and Borough of Juneau’s mining ordinance at its next meeting on March 1 at 5:30 pm in City Hall Chambers.

As the AMC begins its work, the economic benefits of the mining industry remain in the forefront.

The average annual salary at Greens Creek Mine on Admiralty Island is $122,000, from an aggregate payroll of almost $51 million for 414 direct jobs. It is Juneau’s largest property tax payer at $1.7 million annually. Forty-five miles north of Juneau, the Kensington gold mine, with 367 employees, has similarly impressive numbers.

The AMC was established in response to a group that believes current municipal regulation is a barrier to potential development of new mining projects. The group of five businessmen — Frank Bergstrom, Jim Clark, Bill Corbus, Neil MacKinnon and Sam Smith — contends that duplication of permitting processes in state and federal law, along with unnecessary requirements and vague and undefined language in municipal code discourage investment.

Meeting for the first time last July, the AMC recently finalized its organizational structure and membership. The committee is made up of seven voting members — three members of the Assembly: Norton Gregory (Chair), Maria Gladziszewski, and Beth Weldon; two Planning Commissioners: Ben Haight and Paul Voelckers; and two public members: Roman Motyka and John Kato.

The first meeting attended by all members was held on Jan. 3. Committee deliberations, public participation and final recommendations are expected to be complete by May.

Thus far the committee hasn’t made substantive changes but proposed a reorganization and clarification of the code’s provisions. Hopefully, this will lead to eliminating the burden on applicants to provide duplicative information.

But more changes are being considered. And while these changes are being characterized by mining opponents as “gutting” the ordinance, this isn’t the case.

Opponents’ claims to the contrary, no environmental protections would be “rolled back” and our community would continue to have control over how any mining operation would occur.

Under any revised ordinance, large mining projects near Juneau population areas would continue to be subject to a Conditional Use Permit. This allows CBJ the final say on whether the project could proceed. CBJ could add other conditions addressing local concerns such as traffic, noise, dust, visual aspects, surface subsidence and erosion, for instance.

There are three major areas of the existing mining ordinance needing modification. They are the requirement for a socioeconomic study, a mitigation agreement and financial warranties.

None of these requirements were municipal conditions of the opening of the Greens Creek Mine or the Kensington Mine. Indeed, no other industry is subject to all these requirements even though some impacts may be similar.

Federal and state regulators of mining projects require financial warranties and mitigation measures and any EPA environmental impact study would consider socioeconomic impacts. CBJ code revisions should allow approved state and federal permits as evidence of “de facto” compliance with these requirements.

While any new business, its employees, and support vendors exert some short-term pressure on municipal services and housing stock, the history of the Greens Creek Mine and Kensington Mine prove mining projects are extremely beneficial to our economy and can be developed and operated with appropriate environmental safeguards.

In evaluating “people” impacts on our community, there is no logical distinction between 200 mine workers and their families coming to Juneau versus adding 200 new government jobs — except that economic benefits are greater with mining jobs.

So why discriminate against mining companies and their employees? What is the sense in discouraging valuable mining projects here through extra requirements that impose unnecessary studies and duplicative bonding and mitigation measures?

Organizations such as the Juneau Chamber of Commerce and Southeast Conference have already endorsed modifications to the ordinance. But these changes also need to be supported by the general public. You can help by attending the meeting on March 1.

Citizen input is vital to reinforce to our elected Assembly members the importance of diversifying our economy. This is an opportunity to attract environmentally responsible projects that add jobs, families and demographic stability to our community — thereby strengthening our schools, our local businesses and our municipal tax base.


• Win Gruening retired as the senior vice president in charge of business banking for Key Bank in 2012. He was born and raised in Juneau and graduated from the U.S. Air Force Academy in 1970. He is active in community affairs as a 30-plus year member of Juneau Downtown Rotary Club and has been involved in various local and statewide organizations. He contributes a regular “My Turn” to the Juneau Empire. My Turns and Letters to the Editor represent the view of the author, not the view of the Juneau Empire.


More in Opinion

Web
Have something to say?

Here’s how to add your voice to the conversation.

Dr. Karissa Niehoff
OPINION: Protecting the purpose

Why funding schools must include student activities.

A sign reading, "Help Save These Historic Homes" is posted in front of a residence on Telephone Hill on Friday Nov. 21, 2025. (Mari Kanagy / Juneau Empire)
OPINION: The Telephone Hill cost is staggering

The Assembly approved $5.5 million to raze Telephone Hill as part of… Continue reading

Win Gruening (courtesy)
OPINION: Eaglecrest’s opportunity to achieve financial independence, if the city allows it

It’s a well-known saying that “timing is everything.” Certainly, this applies to… Continue reading

Gov. Mike Dunleavy gestures during his State of the State address on Jan. 22, 2026. (Photo by Corinne Smith/Alaska Beacon)
OPINION: It’s time to end Alaska’s fiscal experiment

For decades, Alaska has operated under a fiscal and budgeting system unlike… Continue reading

Atticus Hempel stands in a row of his shared garden. (photo by Ari Romberg)
My Turn: What’s your burger worth?

Atticus Hempel reflects on gardening, fishing, hunting, and foraging for food for in Gustavus.

At the Elvey Building, home of UAF’s Geophysical Institute, Carl Benson, far right, and Val Scullion of the GI business office attend a 2014 retirement party with Glenn Shaw. Photo by Ned Rozell
Alaska Science Forum: Carl Benson embodied the far North

Carl Benson’s last winter on Earth featured 32 consecutive days during which… Continue reading

Van Abbott is a long-time resident of Alaska and California. He has held financial management positions in government and private organizations, and is now a full-time opinion writer. He served in the late nineteen-sixties in the Peace Corps as a teacher. (Contributed)
When lying becomes the only qualification

How truth lost its place in the Trump administration.

Jamie Kelter Davis/The New York Times
Masked federal agents arrive to help immigration agents detain immigrants and control protesters in Chicago, June 4, 2025. With the passage of President Trump’s domestic policy law, the Department of Homeland Security is poised to hire thousands of new Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents, and double detention space.
OPINION: $85 billion and no answers

How ICE’s expansion threatens law, liberty, and accountability.

Most Read