A crane stands by for module and facility installation on the ConocoPhillips GMT-1 drilling pad. First oil from the project flowed on Oct. 5, and royalty revenue from the project could mean hundreds of millions in new funding for affected North Slope communities. (Courtesy Photo | Judy Patrick, ConocoPhillips)

A crane stands by for module and facility installation on the ConocoPhillips GMT-1 drilling pad. First oil from the project flowed on Oct. 5, and royalty revenue from the project could mean hundreds of millions in new funding for affected North Slope communities. (Courtesy Photo | Judy Patrick, ConocoPhillips)

Opinion: Ballot Measure 1 is bad for the Arctic

The future of our state is at stake.

Alaskans have always been territorial and rightfully so. After all, even pre-statehood, Washington, D.C. lawmakers and Lower 48 special interests worked hard and spent heavily to influence what we could or couldn’t do on our land — local, state, Alaska Native or otherwise.

Enter Ballot Measure 1, the latest attack on Alaskans’ rights. By attempting to replace our current development regulations with a permitting process designed to predominantly prevent development, initiative supporters are jeopardizing our rural communities’ ability to fund basic community services, which in the bush are almost wholly reliant upon resource projects. And it’s not just basic services that are in jeopardy. Visions for a deep-water port in the Arctic, infrastructure to support emerging shipping and tourism opportunities, and even the sustainability of North Slope oil fields are on the line here.

The future of our state is at stake and Alaskans should know what they’re up against. I vote no on Ballot Measure 1, and yes to a promising future for Alaska.

John Hopson Jr.,

Wainwright, Alaska


My Turns and Letters to the Editor represent the view of the author, not the view of the Juneau Empire.