Economists try to square Fair Share Act

Long-term goals and short-term uncertainty make it hard to predict potential effects.

Ballot Measure 1, which will raise taxes on certain North Slope oil fields, is on the ballot for Alaska’s general election in November. (Ben Hohenstatt / Juneau Empire)

Ballot Measure 1, which will raise taxes on certain North Slope oil fields, is on the ballot for Alaska’s general election in November. (Ben Hohenstatt / Juneau Empire)

Whether Alaskans are for or against a ballot measure to increase taxes on North Slope oil production, economists Monday asked people to think about the industry long term when they go to the polls next month.

Four economists, all but one based in Alaska, debated the merits of the proposed Ballot Measure 1, officially known as “An Act changing the oil and gas production tax for certain fields, units, and nonunitized reservoirs on the North Slope” but better known as the Fair Share Act, during a virtual forum with the University of Alaska Anchorage.

While millions have been spent on the advertising campaigns for and against the measure, economists struggled to concretely answer the question of what will actually happen if the taxes went into effect, in large part because there are so many moving parts.

“There are different time horizons,” said Mouhcine Guettabi, Associate Professor of Economics at University of Alaska Anchorage’s Institute of Social and Economic Research, which hosted the event. “How much of an effect (the measure has) depends partially with what the state decides to do with the money.”

Guettabi, who said he had no stance on the measure, said over the past few years the state has been using money from savings — the Permanent Fund — to fill the holes in the state budget but also to pay Permanent Fund Dividends. But drawing down savings to pay for both those things is “unsustainable,” he said. Alaska’s budget, he said, “is very much in need of new revenue.”

Opponents of the measure argue that raising taxes on the oil industry, even before the economic downturn caused by the coronavirus pandemic, would decrease investment and lower production leaving the state with little to tax.

“Capital is fluid,” said Roger Marks, an independent economist based in Anchorage. “Oil is a resource that depends on economic expectation.”

Marks said one of his biggest complaints with the yes campaign was what he called, “egregious representations about North Slope profitability.”

[Opinion: The Fair Share Act has a data problem]

Producing oil on Alaska’s North Slope is particularly expensive, Marks said, given the remoteness and harshness of the environment, and companies working in Alaska already pay higher taxes than they do in the Lower 48.

“We have to think about competitiveness and how it would manifest itself,” he said. “Right now, under SB21, they’re paying more than most of the lower 48 states. Producers would have less money to invest, shift investments, there would be incentive to keep production low to avoid (taxes).”

But before Alaska can figure out how much it wanted to tax its oil industry, it needs to figure out what the state is going to look like without the oil industry altogether.

[Election update: Nearly 2,000 more votes counted in local races]

“Where are you trying to get at, what is the endpoint, that should inform what you want to do,” said Nikos Tsafos, energy analyst and senior fellow at the Washington, D.C. think tank, the Center for Strategic and International Studies.

The investor community is moving away from energy, he said, which is leaving oil states with two options. The first is to try to produce every last bit of oil a country has access to, a tactic taken by Saudi Arabia, he said.

The other option was to “skate to where the puck is,” and try to squeeze what remains of the old industry and use the profits to invest in new ones. However, he said the worst thing a state can do is “squeeze” and then not spend the money properly.

Tsafos, who said he has no opinion on the measure, noted the energy market is declining and that investments made today won’t pay off for a long time.

“You go to an investor and say, ‘I want to invest in a sector that’s declining,’ we haven’t seen how those pressures are going to play out in the long term,” Tsafos said.

Most other oil states had nationalized their industries and later brought in private industries, he said, but deciding what is an equitable distribution of state-owned resources has always been contentious and difficult.

“The desire to get the best share has starved the sector,” in some cases, Tsafos said.

While agreeing the economy is moving away from oil, University of Alaska Fairbanks professor Doug Reynolds said the world is going to be dependent on oil for some time, and while there may be a temporary retraction in investment, someone will eventually come for the oil.

“They’re saying they’re not going to invest but eventually they will invest,” Reynolds said. “We’re going to be dependent on oil for a long time. (The North Slope) will get developed eventually, technology will cause costs to go down. (The tax) is not going to ruin the industry, it’s going to be there for a long time.”

Reynolds, who supports the measure, cautioned against the rhetoric of industry collapse.

“I went to the Soviet Union when it was the Soviet Union, I understand what collapse is all about,” he said. “It’s not about fairness, it’s about maximizing value, that’s what all the countries do. You’re not necessarily going to get maximum employment (in the industry), but you don’t want to depend on the oil economy.”

Marks, however, objected to how the word “fair” was being used by the yes campaign.

“The term ‘fair’ has been hijacked,” he said. “Let’s think about investment that’s not happening here, BP left. The issue is how much more do they want to invest, given their opportunities elsewhere.”

• Contact reporter Peter Segall at Follow him on Twitter at @SegallJnuEmpire.

More in News

Jasmine Chavez, a crew member aboard the Quantum of the Seas cruise ship, waves to her family during a cell phone conversation after disembarking from the ship at Marine Park on May 10. (Mark Sabbatini / Juneau Empire file photo)
Ships in port for the week of June 15

Here’s what to expect this week.

Traffic at the Fred Meyer intersection, formally known as Egan and Yandukin drives, in November 2019. (Michael Penn / Juneau Empire file photo)
Upgrades at Fred Meyer intersection overnight Tuesday and Wednesday to affect traffic

One lane on Egan in each direction open 7-9 p.m.; northbound traffic diverted 9 p.m.-5 a.m.

A view of Angoon from a floatplane on Friday. (Jasz Garrett / Juneau Empire)
Thayer Creek Hydro project fulfills ‘dream of the elders’

Angoon hydropower groundbreaking comes after four decades of effort, seeks to stabilize future costs

(Michael Penn / Juneau Empire file photo)
Police calls for Sunday, June 16, 2024

This report contains public information from law enforcement and public safety agencies.

Republican presidential candidate and former U.S. President Donald Trump speaks at the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) at the Gaylord National Resort Hotel And Convention Center on Feb. 24 in National Harbor, Maryland. Attendees descended upon the hotel outside of Washington, D.C., to participate in the four-day annual conference and hear from conservative speakers from around the world who range from journalists, U.S. lawmakers, international leaders and businessmen. (Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)
Trump endorses Dahlstrom for Alaska’s U.S. House seat, criticizes Peltola and Begich

Endorsement could shake up the race, because local Republicans have tended to favor Begich so far.

Customers gather in the seating area of an expanded food court area on Franklin Street on Friday. Reconstruction work that began last fall was recently completed for the facility scheduled to be open between May and September. (Mark Sabbatini / Juneau Empire)
Franklin Street facelift: Sites of former Elks Lodge, Glory Hall debut new eateries, housing

Expanded food court opens at former lodge site; donut shop and low-cost apartments replace shelter.

Runners take off from the starting line of the 35th annual Only Fools Run at Midnight at 11:59 p.m. on Saturday, Sept. 21, 2019. The event included a costume contest and 1-mile and 5-kilometer run/walk/wheelchair. The event is being revived this year at 9 p.m. Friday. (Nolin Ainsworth / Juneau Empire file photo)
‘Only Fools Run’ costume-themed fundraising race returns for summer solstice after multiyear absence

5K and 1-mile events will start downtown at 9 p.m. Friday, rather than old tradition of midnight.

(Michael Penn / Juneau Empire file photo)
Police calls for Saturday, June 15, 2024

This report contains public information from law enforcement and public safety agencies.

(Michael Penn / Juneau Empire file photo)
Police calls for Friday, June 14, 2024

This report contains public information from law enforcement and public safety agencies.

Most Read