teaser

Opinion: Why is CON Still in Alaska?

CON laws are little more than expensive and time-consuming barriers to care.

  • By Dr. Darcy Nikol Bryan and Matthew D. Mitchell
  • Tuesday, May 11, 2021 1:20pm
  • Opinion

By Dr. Darcy Nikol Bryan, MD and Matthew D. Mitchell

Back in 1986, Congress withdrew federal support for states’ certificate-of-need programs. At that time, evidence was already mounting that these health care policies didn’t work as intended. Today, the evidence is even stronger, yet Alaska still has them in place.

CON laws are little more than expensive and time-consuming barriers to care. They require health care providers who wish to open or expand a facility to first prove to a regulatory body that the community needs the service. During this lengthy process, the provider can spend thousands and even hundreds of thousands of dollars in preparation costs and consultation fees. Most controversially, CON laws allow those who are already in business to challenge the candidacy of would-be competitors.

As a medical doctor and an economist, we know that CON fails patients, and that is what we said in our respective testimonies to the Alaska Senate Labor and Commerce Committee on April 21. Dozens of studies conducted by researchers across the political spectrum during the past several decades have confirmed what the federal government found years ago.

Since the federal government repealed its support, 15 states—representing about 40 percent of the U.S. population—have repealed their own CON laws. In Alaska, the program remains quite extensive.

If an Alaskan health care provider wants to change equipment, services, facilities, hospital beds or nonhospital beds, they must get permission. If a new provider wants to open a clinic, it might first cost up to $75,000 in application fees, plus tens of thousands more in consultation fees. Then they will need to wait months for a decision—with no guarantee that their request will be granted. CON laws do manage to protect incumbent providers from competition, which is one reason large hospital systems often support them.

CON supporters worry about a “duplication of services.” But what they call duplication, we call expansion, innovation, and options for patients. Competition drives quality improvements, cost reduction, and safety.

Because CON laws limit competition, they permit regional health care monopolies. This is especially problematic for Alaska’s rural communities. Not only are there fewer hospitals and ambulatory surgery centers per capita in CON states than in non-CON states, but there are also fewer rural services. Patients in CON states also have to drive longer distances to obtain care and are more likely to leave their counties for it. If that’s not bad enough, there are greater racial disparities in the provision of care in CON states.

More competition can also lead to better quality health care. By disempowering doctors, CON laws make it more difficult to provide the highest-quality care at affordable prices, especially in smaller communities. Think about it: If there is only a single hospital nearby, what can a doctor do for patients who aren’t getting what they need?

This helps explain why health outcomes, including patient satisfaction levels and even mortality following certain procedures, are statistically significantly worse in CON states relative to non-CON states.

During the pandemic, 24 states—including Alaska—recognized that CON laws were an impediment to care and suspended some portion of the law or enabled emergency provision. Even so, CON states were more likely to experience shortages of hospital beds than non-CON states, because procurement and planning takes years, not weeks.

State legislatures across the country are looking into repealing, modifying, or limiting their CON programs. If Alaska permitted more competition in the health care field, doctors would be empowered to do more for their patients, and the state would be better prepared for the next health care challenge.

• Dr. Darcy Nikol Bryan, MD is a senior affiliated scholar with the Mercatus Center at George Mason University and a practicing obstetrician gynecologist. Matthew D. Mitchell is a Mercatus senior research fellow. Both recently testified before an Alaska senate committee about the state’s certificate-of-need program.Columns, My Turns and Letters to the Editor represent the view of the author, not the view of the Juneau Empire. Have something to say? Here’s how to submit a My Turn or letter.

More in Opinion

Web
Have something to say?

Here’s how to add your voice to the conversation.

Former Democratic state Rep. Beth Kerttula holds up a sign reading “Vote No Con Con,” during a recent rally at the Dimond Courthouse Plaza in Juneau. Opposition to a constitutional convention, which could alter the Alaska State Constitution to allow for banning abortions was a frequent topic during the protest. (Ben Hohenstatt / Juneau Empire File)
A constitutional convention would be doomed to fail

Principled compromise has given way to the unyielding demands of performative politicians

In this May 31, 2018 photo Sen. Dennis Egan, D-Juneau, speaks to the Greater Juneau Chamber of Commerce during its weekly luncheon at the Moose Lodge. (Michael Penn/ Juneau Empire File)
Opinion: Remembering the man I called ‘boss’

Dennis Egan was able to make me laugh out loud from beyond the grave.

Alexander B. Dolitsky
Opinion: We make our choices and our choices make us

All Americans must be courageous and stand strong against this radical madness…

Heavy metals run out of the Tulsequah Chief mine opening and down to holding ponds next to the Tulsequah River Wednesday, Oct. 8, 2008. Leakage from those ponds can be seen entering the river that flows into the Taku River down stream. (Michael Penn / Juneau Empire File)
Opinion: Cleaning up Tulsequah Chief would improve salmon habitat

Two decades of pressure is finally showing some result.

(Peter Segall / Juneau Empire File)
Opinion: We’re at risk of losing our well-crafted constitution

Vote no for a constitutional convention in November.

T
Opinion: The latest gun regulation bill is nothing to cheer about

The legislation resembles the timid movements of a couple of 6-month old children…

T
Opinion: Here’s what I expect of lawmakers in a post-Roe America

I urge lawmakers to codify abortion rights at the state and federal levels.

t

Most Read