House Speaker Louise Stutes, R-Kodiak, listens to representatives debate a COVID-19 disaster declaration on Thursday, March 25, 2021. (Peter Segall / Juneau Empire)

House Speaker Louise Stutes, R-Kodiak, listens to representatives debate a COVID-19 disaster declaration on Thursday, March 25, 2021. (Peter Segall / Juneau Empire)

Lawmakers clash on how to manage pandemic

Disaster debate shows deep divisions.

Debate among state lawmakers over whether to issue another disaster declaration turned into an hours-long dispute over the direction the state should take in combating the COVID-19 pandemic.

The House of Representatives was on the floor most of Thursday to debate amendments to a bill declaring another emergency. Gov. Mike Dunleavy let the state’s emergency declaration lapse on Feb. 15, after using executive power to extend the order twice. Since the lapse, health care groups and some municipalities have been asking the state to reinstate the declaration in order to have more flexibility to fight the pandemic.

While the bill itself originally came from Dunleavy when he submitted disaster declaration bills at the beginning of the legislative session, he has since said such an order is no longer necessary.

Rep. Steve Thompson, R-Fairbanks, offered an amendment that would have removed references to a broad disaster declaration and enumerated specific provisions he said would allow the governor to effectively combat the pandemic.

[Looming benefit loss causes food security concerns]

Dunleavy said in a March 24 letter that an emergency declaration wasn’t necessary to maintain the various state efforts to combat the pandemic such as testing and vaccinations. Republican lawmakers repeatedly referenced the letter in support of the amendment, but many also voiced the belief declaring another emergency sent the wrong message to Alaskans.

“I refuse to normalize a state of emergency,” said Rep. Sarah Vance, R-Homer, adding that the state should focus on reopening its economy.

Democrats and Independents countered that the pandemic remains ongoing, citing the recent rise in the state’s test positivity rate, and said the emergency declaration simply provided tools to the governor he could use or not use at his discretion.

“While there has been some improvement, the pandemic very much continues,” said Rep. Tiffany Zulkosky, D-Bethel. “Now is not the time to dismantle resources.”

Members of both camps argued their respective proposals would help boost the economy. Democrats cited the support of business groups and others who see the flexibility provided by a declaration as part of the state’s economic recovery. Rep. Liz Snyder, D-Anchorage, and other Democrats said the declaration would send a strong message to tourists and businesses about the stability of Alaska during the pandemic.

Rep. Bryce Edgmon, I-Dillingham, said that Michigan is the only other state without a disaster declaration.

But Republicans said the opposite is true. Rep. Ben Carpenter, R-Nikiski, said declaring another disaster would send the message the situation in Alaska is deteriorating. Several Republican lawmakers questioned how long a state of emergency was expected to continue.

[AG defends pandemic emergency orders during hearing]

“The disaster mentality itself is damaging,” said Rep. James Kaufman, R-Anchorage. “That mentality may be as damaging as anything that could happen or has happened. To return a state of disaster would irrevocably harm the state.”

Reps. Chris Kurka and David Eastman, both Wasilla Republicans, offered a series of amendments that would have prevented the mandating of vaccines for employment and discrimination for those who decline a COVID-19 vaccine and liability for businesses that did require vaccines. Amendment 10 from Eastman would have made transportation companies such as airlines legally liable for injury resulting from receiving the vaccine if they were to require vaccines from transportation.

All those amendments failed along caucus lines but an amendment from Rep. DeLena Johnson, R-Palmer, preventing any federal pandemic relief funds from being used for non-medically necessary abortions, did pass. Supporters of the amendment said while there were no provisions in federal relief funds specifically for abortion, there was similarly no language preventing it.

Thursday’s debate was only the bill’s second hearing, and it was held until Friday morning for a final vote on the floor. If the bill passes, it will be sent to the Senate whose leadership has expressed reservations against enacting another declaration.

Senate President Peter Micciche, R-Soldotna, previously told the Empire he wanted to send a bill to the governor’s office that would get signed.

• Contact reporter Peter Segall at psegall@juneauempire.com. Follow him on Twitter at @SegallJnuEmpire.

More in News

Michael Penn / Juneau Empire File
The Aurora Borealis glows over the Mendenhall Glacier in 2014.
Aurora Forecast

Forecasts from the University of Alaska Fairbanks’ Geophysical Institute for the week of March. 19

Juneau Brass Quintet co-founding member Bill Paulick along with Stephen Young performs “Shepherd’s Hey” to a packed house at the Alaska State Museum on Saturday as part of the quintet’s season-ending performance. Friends of the Alaska State Library, Archives and Museum sponsored the event with proceeds going to the musicians and FoSLAM. (Jonson Kuhn / Juneau Empire)
Top brass turns out for event at State Museum

Free performance puts a capt on a busy season.

On Thursday, the Alaska State Board of Education approved a resolution that supports barring transgender female students from participating in girls’ sports. (Getty Images illustration via Alaska Beacon)
State school board supports barring transgender female students from participating in girls’ sports

On Thursday, the Alaska State Board of Education approved a resolution that… Continue reading

Mark Sabbatini / Juneau Empire 
State Sen. Lyman Hoffman, D-Bethel, asks Randy Bates, director of the Division of Water for the Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation, about state water quality regulations some fish hatcheries are calling harmful during a Senate Finance Committee meeting Friday. The meeting was to review the DEC’s proposal to take over responsibility for many federal Clean Water Act permits, claiming it will be more responsible and efficient for development projects. Some of the senators questioned both the cost of the state taking over a process currently funded by the federal government, as well as the state’s ability to properly due to the job within the guidelines for such a takeover.
Wading into rule change proposals affecting clean water

National PFAS limits, state takeover of wetlands permits raise doubts about who should take charge

Guy Archibald collects clam shell specimens on Admiralty Island. Archibald was the lead author of a recently released study that linked a dramatic increase of lead levels in Hawk Inlet’s marine ecosystem and land surrounding it on Admiralty Island to tailings released from the nearby Hecla Greens Creek Mine. (Courtesy Photo / John Neary)
New study links mine to elevated lead levels in Hawk Inlet

Hecla Greens Creek Mine official ardently refutes the report’s findings.

(Michael Penn / Juneau Empire File)
Police calls for Saturday, March 18, 2023

This report contains information from law enforcement and public safety agencies.

HP Marshall of Boise State University takes a photo of Alaska’s North Slope north of the Brooks Range during a snow survey as part of a NASA experiment. (Courtesy Photo / Sveta Stuefer)
Alaska Science Forum: Dozens descend upon Alaska to measure snow

“We would like to be able to map the water-equivalent (in snow) globally.”

(Michael Penn / Juneau Empire File)
Police calls for Friday, March 17, 2023

This report contains information from law enforcement and public safety agencies.

Most Read