Opinion: When it comes to voting, easier isn’t always better

This is not for the people.

  • Monday, April 12, 2021 12:56pm
  • Opinion

I am disappointed that the League of Women Voters has endorsed the For the People Act, H.R. 1, which passed the U.S. House of Representatives.

This act eliminates most of the guardrails that assure fair and accurate elections and undermines most of the 1993 and 2002 bipartisan election laws in an effort to make voting easier.

The legislation, among other things, would have the federal government control elections to an unprecedented degree, taking authority away from state election laws; do away with requiring ID to vote; promote vote by-mail; change the way we draw congressional districts; mandate same-day online voter registration; require nonprofits to disclose their donors (likely promoting First Amendment lawsuits); and provide for public financing of campaigns.

This is not for the people. This is for federal control. Polls show that people approve of voter ID by a substantial margin. Vote-by-mail is problematic since it entails sending a ballot to everyone on a state’s registration list. Unfortunately, although cleaning up voter rolls is a legal requirement, states have had to be sued to force them to remove the names of people who have died, people who have moved or people who haven’t voted in many years. This causes a lot of ballots to be floating around. H.R. 1 would eliminate removing the names of those who haven’t voted in many years, apparently in the hope they will surface eventually to do their civic duty. In many cases, same-day voter registration does not allow time for election officials to cross-check databases to ascertain whether someone is eligible to vote.

A final note: During the last election, much of the election coverage equated vote-by-mail and absentee balloting. They are different. The procedure to vote absentee requires requesting an absentee ballot and providing identification. Vote-by-mail has no such safeguards.

H.R. 1 was not a bipartisan effort. Hopefully, it will be rejected by the Senate. Easier is not always better.

• Judy Ripley resides in Juneau. Columns, My Turns and Letters to the Editor represent the view of the author, not the view of the Juneau Empire. Have something to say? Here’s how to submit a My Turn or letter.

More in Opinion

Web
Have something to say?

Here’s how to add your voice to the conversation.

(Peter Segall / Juneau Empire File)
Opinion: Alaskans should support Ocean Ranger program

Alaskans should be concerned that these floating cities could go unchecked.

Gavel (Courtesy photo)
Opinion: The foolish men claiming self-defense

By Rich Moniak A not guilty verdict “will not be a miscarriage… Continue reading

teaser
Opinion: Why giving is part of our Alaska way of life

GCI is encouraging our fellow Alaskans to offer a hand to our most vulnerable neighbors in need.

(Peter Segall / Juneau Empire File)
Opinion: State defends its right to cut nonexistent taxes

By Larry Persily There is an inescapable irony to the fact that… Continue reading

teaser
Opinion: Peeling the onion on Thanksgiving

“Peeling the onion” is an expression often used as a metaphor for… Continue reading

teaser
Opinion: We’re on a road to ochlocracy

The conclusion of the Rittenhouse trial reminded us of the summer of 2020. It is a painful reminder.

Most Read