Heavy metals run out of the Tulsequah Chief mine opening and down to holding ponds next to the Tulsequah River Wednesday, Oct. 8, 2008. (Michael Penn / Juneau Empire file)

Opinion: Broken promises and stonewalling since last B.C. mining ministry visit make it clear meaningful international action is needed

Why would we settle for anything less?

  • By Mary Catharine Martin
  • Saturday, March 4, 2023 6:30am
  • Opinion

In August of 2015, one year after British Columbia’s Mount Polley mine waste dam disaster, I joined the Empire’s editorial board to listen to then-B.C. Minister of Energy and Mines William “Bill” Bennett make compelling, empty promises.

A year and a half before, I had begun reporting for the Empire on the issue of B.C. mines along Alaska-B.C. transboundary rivers. Bennett’s mission while in town — though he would probably describe it differently — was to defuse concern about B.C.’s massive mining development and poor track record upstream of Alaska, and to weaken locally-driven efforts to meaningfully address it. He was very good at his job. That one-hour meeting resulted in an editorial headlined “Bennett’s visit reason for cautious optimism.”

When I asked Bennett about the involvement of the International Joint Commission, which prevents and resolves disputes under the Boundary Waters Treaty of 1909, and which Alaskans and tribes had long been requesting, he told me this: “It’s very much premature to start rushing towards, you know, one big solution that’s going to make everybody feel better.”

Instead of IJC involvement, Bennett’s visit led to a nonbinding, unfunded agreement, or Memorandum of Understanding, between the state of Alaska and the province of British Columbia, as well as a nonbinding “Statement of Cooperation,” or SOC. A year after signing the statement, Bennett retired from government and joined the boards of companies looking to develop gold-copper mines along the Stikine River and the Portland Canal.

Since Bennett’s Juneau visit, B.C. has doubled down on industrializing the headwaters of our shared wild salmon rivers without our consent downstream. Almost 90% of the B.C. side of the Unuk River is staked with mining claims, actively being mined, or under development. All lands directly bordering the Iskut, the largest tributary to the Stikine River, are staked for mining or under development. The Tulsequah Chief mine, an underground B.C. gold mine in the Taku River watershed that was abandoned in 1957, continues to leach sulfuric acid and contamination into shared waters, despite B.C.’s promises for decades to clean it up and Bennett’s assurances in 2015. An expert analysis last year highlighted that six of B.C.’s riskiest massive mine waste dams are located on transboundary systems – and are predicted to “destroy ecosystems and/or kill people when they fail.”

In the last four years, under Gov. Mike Dunleavy, the transboundary working group established under former Gov.Bill Walker and Lt. Gov. Byron Mallott has basically disbanded; the state’s webpage on transboundary issues hasn’t been updated for two years; and a single 2021 Zoom call organized by the State and B.C. and billed as “transparency” was closed to questions from tribes, community members, and organizations. Alaskans now find out about new B.C. mine development bordering Alaska not from the state but from our own research, including the proposed reopenings of the Eskay Creek and New Polaris gold mines along the Unuk and Taku rivers.

That’s why over the last couple of years nine Southeast Alaska municipalities and seven Southeast Alaska tribes have passed powerful resolutions. They call for a permanent ban on British Columbia’s mine waste dams in transboundary systems, and a temporary pause on new B.C. mining development until all of those impacted have true seats at the table to have a meaningful say in the future of shared salmon rivers.

So perhaps it’s no surprise that, given this momentum, B.C. mining ministry representatives are once again coming to town this week. While it’s good for B.C. to acknowledge us Alaskans, I suppose, their mission is likely much the same as Bennett’s almost eight years ago: to forestall the binding, federal action Alaskans and tribes have long requested.

In the end, no matter what B.C. officials say while in town this week, Southeast Alaskans don’t need another eight years of broken promises, misdirection, and failed handshake agreements from British Columbia. We need the U.S. federal government to secure international, binding action that will ensure tribes and Alaskans downstream have a meaningful voice for our wild salmon rivers, as is provided for under international law.

Why would we settle for anything less?

• Mary Catharine Martin is a former Juneau Empire reporter and the current communications director for SalmonState and Salmon Beyond Borders. She won an Alaska Press Club award and first place in the Morris Journalism Excellence awards for her watchdog reporting on transboundary mining.

More in Opinion

Web
Have something to say?

Here’s how to add your voice to the conversation.

Win Gruening (courtesy)
OPINION: Eaglecrest’s opportunity to achieve financial independence, if the city allows it

It’s a well-known saying that “timing is everything.” Certainly, this applies to… Continue reading

Gov. Mike Dunleavy gestures during his State of the State address on Jan. 22, 2026. (Photo by Corinne Smith/Alaska Beacon)
OPINION: It’s time to end Alaska’s fiscal experiment

For decades, Alaska has operated under a fiscal and budgeting system unlike… Continue reading

Atticus Hempel stands in a row of his shared garden. (photo by Ari Romberg)
My Turn: What’s your burger worth?

Atticus Hempel reflects on gardening, fishing, hunting, and foraging for food for in Gustavus.

At the Elvey Building, home of UAF’s Geophysical Institute, Carl Benson, far right, and Val Scullion of the GI business office attend a 2014 retirement party with Glenn Shaw. Photo by Ned Rozell
Alaska Science Forum: Carl Benson embodied the far North

Carl Benson’s last winter on Earth featured 32 consecutive days during which… Continue reading

Van Abbott is a long-time resident of Alaska and California. He has held financial management positions in government and private organizations, and is now a full-time opinion writer. He served in the late nineteen-sixties in the Peace Corps as a teacher. (Contributed)
When lying becomes the only qualification

How truth lost its place in the Trump administration.

Jamie Kelter Davis/The New York Times
Masked federal agents arrive to help immigration agents detain immigrants and control protesters in Chicago, June 4, 2025. With the passage of President Trump’s domestic policy law, the Department of Homeland Security is poised to hire thousands of new Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents, and double detention space.
OPINION: $85 billion and no answers

How ICE’s expansion threatens law, liberty, and accountability.

Yereth Rosen/Alaska Beacon
The entrance to the Alaska Gasline Development Corp.’s Anchorage office is seen on Aug. 11, 2023. The state-owned AGDC is pushing for a massive project that would ship natural gas south from the North Slope, liquefy it and send it on tankers from Cook Inlet to Asian markets. The AGDC proposal is among many that have been raised since the 1970s to try commercialize the North Slope’s stranded natural gas.
My Turn: Alaskans must proceed with caution on gasline legislation

Alaskans have watched a parade of natural gas pipeline proposals come and… Continue reading

Win Gruening (courtesy)
OPINION: Juneau Assembly members shift priorities in wish list to Legislature

OPINION: Juneau Assembly members shift priorities in wish list to Legislature

Most Read