Vote ‘yes’ on salmon habitat ballot initiative

I have been thinking long and hard about the salmon habitat ballot initiative that will be on Alaska’s November ballot. I served as Director of the Habitat Division of the Alaska Department of Fish and Game for seven years under former Govs. Steve Cowper and Wally Hickel, and as Commissioner of ADF&G for eight years under Gov. Tony Knowles. I, and the professional biologists who work at ADF&G, implemented the current anadromous fish habitat statutes.

All three administrations I worked for had strong advocates for salmon habitat and did a good job of protecting it.

So, what has changed to make me want to see the Stand for Salmon ballot initiative pass?

The initiative puts clear, science-based salmon habitat standards in statute and provides for a robust public process when resource development decisions that could have significant negative impacts on salmon habitat are made.

Without clear science-based standards, each person’s judgment as to what constitutes “proper protection” will be different. Some administrations have shown strong support for salmon habitat protection. Others have emphasized competing uses over salmon. For example, the Murkowski administration went so far as to move the habitat statutes from ADF&G to the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) so the Commissioner of DNR, not the commissioner of ADF&G, would be the ultimate judge of what constitutes “proper protection” of anadromous fish habitat.

ADF&G had help protecting fish habitat back when I was there. We had the Coastal Management Program. There is no longer a Coastal Management Program in Alaska. The legislature repealed it. The Coastal Management Program provided habitat standards, local government participation, public involvement, and an interagency process for resolving differences and finding ways for development projects to move ahead, or not, while protecting fish and other important resources. That is gone and ADF&G anadromous fish permits don’t require public notice.

Many of Alaska’s salmon stocks are now stressed by changing ocean conditions. As climate change continues to affect ocean and freshwater salmon habitat, it is particularly important that Alaska protect its freshwater habitat so we maintain salmon productivity and genetic diversity. Protecting freshwater habitat is something Alaska can do without help from anyone else. Managing ocean conditions will require federal policy initiatives. But, if Alaska takes care of our freshwater habitat, salmon will have a better chance to adapt to the long-term changes that are facing them.

You, the users of Alaska salmon and the developers of Alaska’s other natural resources, should not have to depend on me, or any individual, to use their judgment on a case-by-case basis to interpret the vague “proper protection” standard of the current anadromous fish habitat statute. You deserve science-based statutory standards, like those in the initiative, to clearly define what constitutes “proper protection” of anadromous fish habitat.

I had hoped that during the last legislative session the fish habitat protection bill (House Bill 199) introduced by Rep. Louise Stutes, R-Kodiak, would be the vehicle for Alaskans to develop science-based standards for anadromous fish habitat protection. But there was no serious consideration of HB 199 by the legislature.

The Constitution gives the people of Alaska the initiative process to address important issues when the legislature fails to act. If this initiative passes, the legislature has the ability to immediately clarify language in the initiative if necessary, and in two years the legislature can amend, or even go so far as to repeal, the initiative.

Despite what I view as drawbacks in the initiative process, it is my hope that this initiative passes. ADF&G can then work with the public and all affected interests to implement regulations. If during that process there are significant issues raised, or problems found, the department and the governor can work with the public and the legislature to amend the statute to address those issues.

Without the stimulus of this ballot initiative I do not think the legislature will give the Department of Fish and Game strong, clear, science-based anadromous fish habitat standards and a robust public process that I think are needed to keep Alaska’s wild salmon healthy and sustainable in the face of climate change and ongoing development pressure.

For these reasons, I will be voting “yes” on the salmon habitat initiative in November.

• Frank Rue lives in Juneau. He was habitat director of the Alaska Department of Fish and Game from 1988-1994. He served as the Commissioner of the Department of Fish and Game from 1995-2002.

More in Opinion

Opinion: Program gives me hope that cycles of family violence can be broken

The program is a holistic family-focused, culturally based counseling/treatment model…

Have something to say?

Here’s how to add your voice to the conversation.

Deven Mitchell greets his fellow members of the Alaska Permanent Fund Corp.’s Board of Trustees at the start of his interview Monday to be the APFC’s new executive director. (Mark Sabbatini / Juneau Empire File)
Opinion: It’s an honor to now lead Alaska’s largest renewable resource

This October, I was provided the opportunity to serve as the Executive… Continue reading

Opinion: New to Medicare? Please consider this

Please choose “original” Medicare and avoid the so-called “advantage” plans

The Alaska State Capitol awaits a legislators forming new majority coalitions and the return of Gov. Mike Dunleavy after the winners of the general election were announced Wednesday. The Senate will have a 17-member bipartisan ruling coalition, while the House arrangement remains uncertain due to at least one likely recount and questions about partisan alignments. (Clarise Larson / Juneau Empire File)
Opinion: The rising purple tide in the state Senate

A purple tide threatens to inundate the uncompromising wing of the state Republican Party.

Opinion: Giving is for everyone – and the time to act is now

You don’t have to be rich, or prominent, or famous to care about your community…

A roll of “I Voted” stickers await voters on Election Day in Alaska. Voters overwhelmingly rejected the prospect of a state constitutional convention. (Ben Hohenstatt / Juneau Empire File)
Opinion: Election winners, losers and poor losers

Tshibaka and Palin misread Alaskans by thinking Trump’s endorsement all but guaranteed they’d win.

Norwegian Cruise Lines announced in late August that it would donate a 2.9 acre plot of land owned by the cruise line since 2019 on Juneau's waterfront to Huna Totem Corporation to develop. (Michael S. Lockett / Juneau Empire File)
Opinion: Aak’w Landing is Juneau’s most promising new project

Now, more than ever, our community needs the jobs, tax revenue, and stability…

Most Read