Elon Musk boards Air Force One at Joint Base Andrews in Maryland, on Friday, March 21, 2025. Musk was traveling with President Donald Trump to Bedminster, N.J. The world’s richest man made inaccurate claims about entitlement fraud, how a government payment system works and government survey costs. (Eric Lee/The New York Times)

Elon Musk boards Air Force One at Joint Base Andrews in Maryland, on Friday, March 21, 2025. Musk was traveling with President Donald Trump to Bedminster, N.J. The world’s richest man made inaccurate claims about entitlement fraud, how a government payment system works and government survey costs. (Eric Lee/The New York Times)

My Turn: Is it time to impeach Elon Musk?

The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.

— Article II, Section 4 of the United States Constitution

It has been slightly more than two months since President Trump assumed office and deputized entrepreneur Elon Musk to fundamentally reshape the executive branch of the federal government. Symbolically wielding his chainsaw and ignoring the constraints imposed by the United States Constitution on the arbitrary exercise of power, Musk has sown chaos and wreaked havoc on government agencies that provide essential services for millions of Americans. For his actions, he should be impeached, convicted and removed from any further role in government.

James Madison, regarded as the “Father of the American Constitution” noted that impeachment was to be used to reach a bad officer sheltered by the President and to remove him “even against the will of the President; so that the declaration in the Constitution was intended as a supplementary security for the good behavior of the public officers.”

Two questions immediately arise. The first, is Elon Musk “a civil officer” subject to impeachment? There is no explicit guidance in the Constitution itself, but historical practice suggests that, aside from judges, a “civil officer” is appointed by the President and exercises significant authority. In this context, Elon Musk fits the bill. He was personally appointed by the President and exercises more unconstrained authority than any other official in the President’s domain.

The second question is whether Musk has committed “other high crimes and misdemeanors.” George Mason, another Framer of the Constitution, is responsible for this language. He intended the language to be a broad category that swept in not only crimes like bribery, but abuse of power and other violations of the public trust.

The bill of particulars against Musk is myriad. He has purported to freeze Congressionally appropriated funds, declared himself the sole arbiter of his multibillion dollar conflicts of interest, fired thousands of federal workers based on unfounded assertions of poor job performance, invaded numerous federal databases that are and must be confidential according to laws passed by Congress, attempted to fully shut down federal agencies that are established by law, irrevocably harmed America’s ability to bring about desired international change through diplomacy and persuasion rather than through coercion and threats, undermined its standing in the world by gutting USAID, and further denigrated the rule of law by calling for the impeachment of judges deciding against him and by openly advocating that the administration ignore unfavorable rulings of the Nation’s courts.

The current make-up of Congress makes it highly unlikely that the House would adopt articles of impeachment or that the Senate would vote to convict. However, that dynamic could well change as the American public and their elected representatives come to appreciate the full extent of the harm that Musk has inflicted on the Nation… and especially so were President Trump to extend Musk’s temporary appointment and his license to cause further damage to the Republic. Ultimately Congress may not render judgment, but history most assuredly will.

• Bruce Botelho served as Alaska’s attorney general under Governors Wally Hickel and Tony Knowles and four terms as mayor of Juneau.

More in Opinion

Web
Have something to say?

Here’s how to add your voice to the conversation.

President Donald Trump speaks to reporters before boarding Air Force One at Morristown Airport in Morristown, N.J., on Sunday, April 27, 2025. (Eric Lee/The New York Times)
My Turn: The cost of chaos

Argentina was a 20th-century economic powerhouse, considered too modern and successful to… Continue reading

(Juneau Empire file photo)
Letter: Sullivan should continue support for Ukraine shown by US in past

I strongly urge Sen. Sullivan to live up to his, and our… Continue reading

The Juneau Arts and Culture Center on Tuesday, Aug. 27, 2019. (Michael Penn / Juneau Empire file photo)
My Turn: DEI and the JAHC

Back in November 2024, following the election, I noticed that the Pride… Continue reading

(City and Borough of Juneau photo)
My Turn: Even marginalized people can petition their government

In response to Win Gruening’s latest column (“Juneau taxpayers fight back”), Gruening… Continue reading

A pro-Russian rally in Yevpatoriya, Crimea, shortly before Crimea was annexed by Russia, March 5, 2014. In Ukraine, memories of Russiaճ annexation are fresh and resentments runs high, leaving the countryճ president few choices on the latest American peace plan. (Sergey Ponomarev/The New York Times)
Opinion: The price of appeasing Trump

Early Thursday morning, Russia fired 70 missiles directly at Kyiv. And sent… Continue reading

(Juneau Empire file photo)
Letter: Illegal deportations are a threat to all

Liberty is dead. In the last two months, the federal government has… Continue reading

Gov. Mike Dunleavy speaks to reporters during a press conference at the Alaska State Capitol on Thursday, April 17, 2025. (Mark Sabbatini / Juneau Empire file photo)
My Turn: Trump-Dunleavy’s obliteration day

Alaska has overwhelmingly voted twice for President Trump and Gov. Dunleavy. So,… Continue reading

(Juneau Empire file photo)
Letter: JAHC removing DEI language is a compromise of principles

In regards to the article about the JAHC removing DEI language from… Continue reading

Most Read