Wolf-hunting buffer must come from board or Legislature

Wolf-hunting buffer must come from board or Legislature

One of the core constitutional duties of the Alaska Legislature is to manage our fish and game resources among many competing uses — subsistence and non-subsistence hunting and trapping; subsistence, commercial, sport and personal use fishing; and recreational viewing. For the most part, the Alaska Legislature delegated these constitutional duties to the Board of Fisheries and the Board of Game. This includes the decision to allow wolf hunting and trapping along side Denali National Park.

It has come to our attention that some question whether a so called “wolf buffer zone” by Denali, where wolf hunting and trapping would be prohibited, can be created outside of the legislative or Board of Game process. The answer is no.

The simplest and most effective way to re-establish a wolf buffer zone is through regulatory action by the board. We understand this has been tried on numerous occasions ever since the board removed the wolf buffer zone in 2010. Although it may be frustrating, absent legislation, the authority to establish a permanent wolf buffer zone lies solely within the authority of the board and no other department.

Since the ultimate constitutional authority for fish and game management lies with the Alaska Legislature, the legislature could always enact a law re-establishing a wolf buffer zone. Legislation to do just that was introduced in 2017, and the Department of Law saw no legal issues with the last version of that bill.

Some other options we’ve heard about would involve the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) or some form of land exchange. Neither of these would really be able to create the buffer zone that’s desired. You have to remember that the State does not own all the land around Denali — some is owned by the Mental Health Trust Authority and some is owned by private individuals and municipalities. DNR only has authority over the state lands, which makes any sort of land exchange or creation of a new state park problematic. These options also fail to get over the main legal hurdle — the board, by delegation from the legislature, has management authority over wolves and all other wildlife across the entire state, with few exceptions. The most that could be accomplished through another method would be piecemeal, temporary, and legally suspect.

The purpose of this commentary is not to suggest which policy is better — buffer zone or no buffer zone. But we do think it’s important that the correct process is followed. We all live in Alaska in part because we love the outdoors and the abundant wildlife. Whether we hunt, fish, trap or just enjoy the scenery, we all want to make sure our fish and game management meets the constitutional requirements of sustained yield and maximum benefit for all. And there are plenty of opportunities before both the board and the legislature to have your voice heard and advocate for change in game management.

• Jahna Lindemuth is the Attorney General for the State of Alaska and Sam Cotten is Commissioner of the Department of Fish and Game. My Turns and Letters to the Editor represent the view of the author, not the view of the Juneau Empire.

More in Opinion

Deven Mitchell greets his fellow members of the Alaska Permanent Fund Corp.’s Board of Trustees at the start of his interview Monday to be the APFC’s new executive director. (Mark Sabbatini / Juneau Empire File)
Opinion: It’s an honor to now lead Alaska’s largest renewable resource

This October, I was provided the opportunity to serve as the Executive… Continue reading

Have something to say?

Here’s how to add your voice to the conversation.

Opinion: New to Medicare? Please consider this

Please choose “original” Medicare and avoid the so-called “advantage” plans

The Alaska State Capitol awaits a legislators forming new majority coalitions and the return of Gov. Mike Dunleavy after the winners of the general election were announced Wednesday. The Senate will have a 17-member bipartisan ruling coalition, while the House arrangement remains uncertain due to at least one likely recount and questions about partisan alignments. (Clarise Larson / Juneau Empire File)
Opinion: The rising purple tide in the state Senate

A purple tide threatens to inundate the uncompromising wing of the state Republican Party.

Opinion: Giving is for everyone – and the time to act is now

You don’t have to be rich, or prominent, or famous to care about your community…

A roll of “I Voted” stickers await voters on Election Day in Alaska. Voters overwhelmingly rejected the prospect of a state constitutional convention. (Ben Hohenstatt / Juneau Empire File)
Opinion: Election winners, losers and poor losers

Tshibaka and Palin misread Alaskans by thinking Trump’s endorsement all but guaranteed they’d win.

Norwegian Cruise Lines announced in late August that it would donate a 2.9 acre plot of land owned by the cruise line since 2019 on Juneau's waterfront to Huna Totem Corporation to develop. (Michael S. Lockett / Juneau Empire File)
Opinion: Aak’w Landing is Juneau’s most promising new project

Now, more than ever, our community needs the jobs, tax revenue, and stability…

Opinion: Freedom in the classroom sets precedence for the future

We advocate for the adoption of legislation to protect students’ First Amendment rights…

Most Read