A road north of Juneau would have to negotiate the steep terrain of the east side of Lynn Canal, pictured here in a February 2014 Juneau Empire file photo. (Michael Penn | Juneau Empire)

A road north of Juneau would have to negotiate the steep terrain of the east side of Lynn Canal, pictured here in a February 2014 Juneau Empire file photo. (Michael Penn | Juneau Empire)

The problem with resurrecting the great road debate

  • By Rich Moniak
  • Monday, July 30, 2018 10:14am
  • Opinion

Last week the Federal Highway Administration endorsed Governor Bill Walker’s decision not to construct a road up Lynn Canal. The formal record of decision sent the project into a politically induced coma. Whenever it’s resurrected, and by all indications it will be, state officials need to come clean about the project’s long-term objectives. Because any decision to build the road will likely be followed by a lawsuit to stop it.

Just like it was a decade ago.

“The analysis reveals a clear bias toward road construction and a concerted effort to ignore public sentiment.” That was a joint statement made by the Southeast Alaska Conservation Society, the Alaska Transportation Priorities Project and the Auk Kwaan in March 2006. It was made in response to the final environmental impact statement published by the Department of Transportation. Like now, the preferred alternative was to build a road that would connect travelers to Haines and Skagway via shuttle ferries at Katzehin.

A highway extension that ended at Katzehin had not been ADOT’s preferred alternative until that time. They’ve wanted to build the road all the way to Skagway ever since the Klondike Highway was completed in 1979. But, as the Empire pointed out in a November 2014 editorial, the law prohibited spending federal funds to construct “a road into a national landmark if a viable alternative exists.”

That landmark is the portion of the Klondike National Historical Park on the east side of Lynn Canal.

The editorial board at the Empire didn’t support the project ending at Katzehin. They wanted “the whole road.” If it was built, they argued with good reason, “we suspect the state will return to the drawing board in a few years and try to gain support for the second half of the road — this time built with state money in order to avoid National Park Service objections.”

That’s exactly what advocates of the road believe. “The road will ultimately go to Skagway,” Denny DeWitt, the director of the First Things First Foundation, told the Empire last week while calling the FHWA decision “another slight delay in moving forward toward that end.” And it was the inevitability touted by Win Gruening a few months ago when he wrote about a transportation poll commissioned by DeWitt’s group.

If that is the ultimate goal, then ADOT began its 2014 environmental analysis knowing the road to Katzehin would be the preferred alternative. Even if they didn’t cook the books, so to speak, that bias still could have generated data and findings unjustly supportive of their predetermined conclusion. And because they weren’t compatible with that end objective, the benefits of other alternatives couldn’t have been taken seriously.

Most federally funded projects follow a similar trajectory. They begin with the intent to build what’s deemed the best solution to a problem. Other alternatives are only developed to comply with the National Environmental Protection Act.

That may sound like a bureaucratic process that results in unnecessary delays and a waste of taxpayer money. But it’s intended to ensure legitimate concerns about controversial projects aren’t ignored. Think of it as how NEPA makes the people the check and balance on its government’s actions.

That’s why the 2006 is so instructive. SEACC eventually sued the state and won. The courts agreed that ADOT failed to consider an improved marine highway alternative using existing ferries and terminals.

And as we’ve learned from the 2014 analysis, the complainants were also correct that ADOT had badly underestimated the cost of construction. The $273 million price tag then is now $680 million.

Another concern was ADOT had overestimated the benefits of the proposed road. Those are intrinsically related to the traffic demand which is more disputed now than in 2006. Which side is right doesn’t matter right now because the “no action” alternative was selected. But that and every other contentious issue will come alive again whenever the project is revived.

The “continued public controversy” that influenced this record of decision is here to stay. It’s why any decision to build the road won’t likely proceed without a lawsuit. And if ADOT hopes to convince the courts their analysis wasn’t biased, they’ll have to be able to prove they have no intention of ever constructing a highway between Katzehin and Skagway.

• Rich Moniak is a Juneau resident and retired civil engineer with more than 25 years of experience working in the public sector. He contributes a weekly “My Turn” to the Juneau Empire. My Turns and Letters to the Editor represent the view of the author, not the view of the Juneau Empire.

More in Opinion

Have something to say?

Here’s how to add your voice to the conversation.

An array of stickers awaits voters on Election Day 2022. (Clarise Larson / Juneau Empire file photo)
Opinion: The case for keeping the parties from controlling our elections

Next month Alaskans will participate in the second open primary under the… Continue reading

(City and Borough of Juneau photo)
My Turn: ‘Ship-free Saturdays’ will nullify progress made toward controlling cruise ship impacts

Alaska’s wildness and communities are what draw people to this incredible part… Continue reading

(Juneau Empire file photo)
Letter: School board recalls a vote of no-confidence?

While four previous columns in the Empire have expressed concerns about efforts… Continue reading

The U.S. Supreme Court in Washington on Tuesday. The court granted an unprecedented expansion of executive power, worrying the country’s allies. (Tierney L. Cross/The New York Times)
Opinion: A gift-wrapped Supreme Court decision for Republicans

On Monday, U.S. Sen. Dan Sullivan gave us another example of his… Continue reading

The Assembly Room at Independence Hall in Philadelphia, where the original U.S. Constitutional Convention took place. (Antonie Taveneaux / CC BY-SA 3.0)
Opinion: Let’s celebrate our country this Fourth of July

On July 4, 1776, a year after the outbreak of the American… Continue reading

Alaska Permanent Fund Corp. board members, staff and advisors meet Oct. 30, 2023. (Mark Sabbatini / Juneau Empire file photo)
Opinion: The concerns of reasonable Alaskans isn’t ‘noise’

It’s been two months since Alaska Landmine published leaked emails that suggest… Continue reading

Lt. Gov. Nancy Dahlstrom addresses the crowd during an inaugural celebration for her and Gov. Mike Dunleavy at Elizabeth Peratrovich Hall on Jan. 20, 2023. (Mark Sabbatini / Juneau Empire file photo)
Opinion: The many truths Dahlstrom will deny

“Now more than ever, we need real conservative leadership in Washington to… Continue reading

A person departs Bartlett Regional Hospital on July 26, 2023. (Mark Sabbatini / Juneau Empire file photo)
Opinion: The importance of a strong, independent community hospital

Juneau’s city-owned Bartlett Regional Hospital (BRH) is in the news, presenting our… Continue reading

(Juneau Empire file photo)
Letter: Disappointed by JAHC director’s opposition to Ship-Free Saturdays

As a member of the Juneau Arts and Humanities Council, I was… Continue reading