An array of stickers awaits voters on Election Day 2022. (Clarise Larson / Juneau Empire File)

An array of stickers awaits voters on Election Day 2022. (Clarise Larson / Juneau Empire File)

Opinion: One reason to abandon ranked choice elections

A disturbing feature of ranked choice that is easy to miss.

  • By Brian J. Gaines
  • Friday, February 10, 2023 3:19pm
  • Opinion

Nevada recently approved a ballot measure to implement ranked-choice elections, joining Maine and Alaska. As its advocates campaign in other states, should Alaska leap off the ranked-choice bandwagon? Critics contend that it is confusing. That complaint is partly overblown: most Americans have little difficulty ranking pop songs, movies or ice cream flavors. Why not rank candidates for office? The system can be quickly described. Voters rank as many candidates as they like, votes are counted using first-place rankings, and if no candidate wins 50% or more, the last-place candidate is eliminated and any second-place rankings from those ballots are then used along with the first choices from other ballots in a second round. The process repeats until some candidate wins a majority of the ballots counted in that round. Tabulation need not be extremely slow.

There is, however, a disturbing feature of ranked choice that is easy to miss. It is, in technical jargon, non-monotonic: gaining more support can convert a winning candidate into a loser.

Consider a stylized example, featuring candidates A, B, and C, where “ABC” signifies ranking A first, B second, and C third, and so on. Seventeen voters have the following rank orders: 4 ABC; 2 ACB; 6 BCA; 3 CAB; 2 CBA. The initial count, using only first-place rankings, yields A 6, B 6, and C 5. With no candidate breaking 50% of the vote, last-place C is eliminated, and the 5 ballots on which he was ranked first are transferred to the second-ranked candidates in the next tabulation, 3 going to A (the CAB ballots) and 2 to B (the CBA ballots). The second round then results in an A victory over B, 9-8 (53%-47%).

But suppose, instead, that an impressive speech by A, attacking B, convinced 2 of the BCA voters to re-order their rankings to ACB. No one else changes, so the revised counts are: 4 ABC; 4 ACB; 4 BCA, 3 CAB, 2 CBA. The winner, A, has strictly increased her support, which should not hurt.

The first count is now A 8, B 4, C 5. No one wins the seat, and B is eliminated. The 4 BCA ballots go to C by second-place ranking, and the second count yields C 9, A 8. Candidate C wins. Candidate A loses precisely because she persuaded some voters to rank her more highly. From the tabulations alone, observers would not know that A’s loss originated in her own persuasive campaigning, so the curse of gaining new support can be invisible.

Are reversals of this kind likely to be common? It is difficult to say without making many assumptions. Maine’s short experience with ranked-choice has mostly seen general-election races with one Democrat and one Republican splitting most of the vote, while some additional candidates draw enough support that some extra counts and some small vote transfers are required to determine a winner. But Alaska, and now Nevada, combine ranked choice with a so-called “jungle” primary election in which all candidates appear on one ballot and the top few, whatever their party, advance to the general election. The scope for perverse results is greater with more candidates and more evenly spread support.

Ranking allows voters to convey more information about their preferences than picking only one candidate. But not all the information collected on the ballots is used. As the example shows, which second-place choices are counted and which are ignored can matter. Supporters of small parties favor ranked-choice because they believe that plurality rule shrinks their vote, as potential backers switch to their favorite of the major-party candidates, to avoid wasting a vote on a likely loser. Such strategic voting is less tempting with ranked choice. Is there an electoral rule that uses all the information on the ballots and forestalls strategic voting? Alas, no.

There is no perfect electoral system, but if you find it troubling that candidates can be harmed by getting higher rankings, then discarding ranked-choice and returning to most-votes-wins elections in Alaska should appeal.

• Brian J. Gaines is the W. Russell Arrington Professor in State Politics at the University of Illinois. Columns, My Turns and Letters to the Editor represent the view of the author, not the view of the Juneau Empire. Have something to say? Here’s how to submit a My Turn or letter.

More in Opinion

Have something to say?

Here’s how to add your voice to the conversation.

This photo shows downtown Juneau during cruise season as seen from Douglas. Demographic trends show Juneau experiencing a decline in people between the ages of 18 and 64. (Clarise Larson / Juneau Empire File)
Opinion: Reverse the demographic death spiral

Changing our future requires local government and the private sector to work togethe…

(Peter Segall / Juneau Empire File)
Opinion: Want wetlands permits to better reflect Alaska?

Reinstate the Alaska Coastal Management Program.

This image available under the Creative Commons license shows the outline of the state of Alaska filled with the pattern of the state flag.
Opinion: Old models of development that are not sustainable for Alaska

Sustainability means investing in keeping Alaska as healthy as possible.

Gov. Mike Dunleavy speaks in support of an agreement between the Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities and Goldbelt Inc. to pursue engineering and design services to determine whether it’s feasible to build a new ferry terminal facility in Juneau at Cascade Point. (Clarise Larson / Juneau Empire File)
Opinion: What Cascade Point is not

This project is less about trying to improve transportation than serving political ideology.

Gov. Mike Dunleavy unveils proposals to offer public school teachers annual retention bonuses and enact policies restricting discussion of sex and gender in education during a news conference in Anchorage. (Screenshot)
Opinion: As a father and a grandfather, I believe the governor’s proposed laws are anti-family

Now, the discrimination sword is pointing to our gay and transgender friends and families.

(Clarise Larson / Juneau Empire File)
Opinion: When is a road considered a trail?

The latest debate over a commercial use permit to use city land for a bike tour seems overblown.

Opinion: When the state values bigotry over the lives of queer kids

It has been a long, difficult week for queer and trans Alaskans like me.

Unsplash / Louis Velazquez
Opinion: Fish, family and freedom… from Big Oil

“Ultimate investment in the status quo” is not what I voted for.

(Ben Hohenstatt / Juneau Empire File)
Opinion: The time has come to stop Eastman’s willful and wanton damage

God in the Bible makes it clear that we are to care for the vulnerable among us.

(Peter Segall / Juneau Empire File)
Opinion: Fund the schools, respect the voters, lower property taxes

The Assembly should reduce the actual amount of household property tax collection below last year’s.