Opinion: It’s de ja vù all over again with recent court decision

Opinion: It’s de ja vù all over again with recent court decision

As was done in Dred Scott, the judicial branch’s idiotic logic pushes our society to the brink.

“Well, my oath of office requires that I enforce all supreme court decisions, even those I don’t agree with.”

So said the sincerely ignorant conservative icon Ronald Reagan, decades ago, when asked about Roe v. Wade. It was recently echoed by another constitutional ignoramus, Donald Trump. It is reinforced constantly by governors like Michael Dunleavy, who refused to halt court-ordered abortion subsidies, which placed the courts in total defiance of the Legislature.

The 5-4 Supreme Court June v. Russo decision just handed down regarding the Louisiana “pro-life” law was utterly predictable. This column could have been written months ago when Alabama, Louisiana, Ohio and a host of other states passed laws severely curtailing and even completely outlawing abortion. Borrowing a page from the absurd and childish 1992 Casey decision, the court under Chief Justice John Roberts declared itself an interested party in preserving Roe v. Wade. “State decisis” basically means that the court cannot correct errors made by other past justices because it would make them look inconsistent.

Thus, the court makes itself even more ridiculous.

So much for the self-inflated pride of the allegedly neutral referee, which with its media cheerleaders and constitutionally ignorant conservatives believes that one, the judicial branch is a co-equal branch with the executive and legislative; two, they are meant to be the final arbiters on the meaning of the Constitution; and three, their decisions must be obeyed under penalty of violating the oath all federal office-holders must take to the Constitution.

Once again liberals are given a hair-breadth escape from reality. Once again unborn children, large and small, will be snuffed into oblivion under vicious techniques that no one wants to see or hear of because of squeamish sensibilities. Once again, the basic building block of society, the family, will have hardhearted and psychologically scarred harpies screaming triumphantly in the face of cameras, men will again be reduced to irrelevance and the legitimacy of the federal government will suffer.

And as has been said often enough, the constitutional solution to bypass the courts exists right now, today, with an executive or legislative branch that merely requires the will to do so. The president need not enforce the decision and under Article III, Sec. 2 of the Constitution, Congress can exempt the courts in this or any other matter. And as an extra added attraction, the states ought to ignore the ruling, nullify it, and proceed with their prolife laws and start shutting down abortion clinics.

Anti-slavery states nullified federal law in the 1850s on the return of runaway slaves. The Left has already been exercising state and local nullification with “Sanctuary Cities,” “Nuclear Free Zones” and state marijuana laws. Some prolife municipalities have already declared themselves “Sanctuary Cities for the Unborn” and “Abortion-Free Zones” on their own. Any state legislator with an iota of intellectual curiosity needs merely consult Thomas Woods online explanation of nullification, its history and constitutionality and skip having to read his 2010 best-seller “Nullification.”

The federal union and domestic tranquility hangs by a thread. As was done in the Dred Scott case of 1857, the judicial branch’s idiotic logic pushes our society to the brink. The scintilla of understanding regarding not only the Natural but also Constitutional Law, demonstrated by certain states in resisting federal tyranny by passing these laws, now needs to be taken to the next level.

This writer issues a challenge, never yet accepted, to debate the proper constitutional authority of the courts, anywhere in the state, to any elected or appointed official or qualified citizen. The proper venue could be chosen by a local media outlet under Lincoln-Douglas Debate format. In these days of rampant confusion, a scholarly debate on vitally important principles would be a welcome relief and allow the citizens to think for themselves on the issues.

Bob Bird is a 43-year Alaskan, was twice a candidate for the U.S. Senate, former president of Alaska Right to Life and is a talk-show host for KSRM Radio on the Kenai Peninsula. Columns, My Turns and Letters to the Editor represent the view of the author, not the view of the Juneau Empire. Have something to say? Here’s how to submit a My Turn or letter.

More in Opinion

Web
Have something to say?

Here’s how to add your voice to the conversation.

Alaska Senate Majority Leader Gary Stevens, prime sponsor of a civics education bill that passed the Senate last year. (Photo courtesy Alaska Senate Majority Press Office)
Opinion: A return to civility today to lieu of passing a flamed out torch

It’s almost been a year since the state Senate unanimously passed a… Continue reading

Eric Cordingley looks at his records while searching for the graves of those who died at Morningside Hospital at Multnomah Park Cemetery on Wednesday, March 13, 2024, in Portland, Ore. Cordingley has volunteered at his neighborhood cemetery for about 15 years. He’s done everything from cleaning headstones to trying to decipher obscure burial records. He has documented Portland burial sites — Multnomah Park and Greenwood Hills cemeteries — have the most Lost Alaskans, and obtained about 1,200 death certificates. (AP Photo/Jenny Kane)
My Turn: Decades of Psychiatric patient mistreatment deserves a state investigation and report

On March 29, Mark Thiessen’s story for the Associated Press was picked… Continue reading

(Juneau Empire file photo)
Opinion: Alaska House makes the right decision on constitutionally guaranteed PFD

The Permanent Fund dividend is important to a lot of Alaska households,… Continue reading

Alaska Attorney General Treg Taylor in a profile picture at the Department of Law’s website. (Alaska Department of Law photo)
Dunleavy wants a state sponsored legal defense fund

On Friday, the Senate Judiciary Committee held its second hearing on a… Continue reading

Juneau School District administrators and board members listen to a presentation about the district’s multi-million deficit during a Jan. 9 meeting. (Mark Sabbatini / Juneau Empire file photo)
Opinion: The twisted logic of the Juneau School Board recall petition

The ink was hardly dry on the Juneau School District (JSD) FY… Continue reading

A crowd overflows the library at Juneau-Douglas High School: Yadaa.at Kalé on Feb. 22 as school board members meet to consider proposals to address the Juneau School District’s budget crisis. (Mark Sabbatini / Juneau Empire file photo)
My Turn: The last thing Juneau needs now is a divisive school board recall campaign

The long-postponed and necessary closure and consolidation of Juneau schools had to… Continue reading

U.S. Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, delivers her annual address to the Alaska Legislature on Feb. 15 as Senate President Gary Stevens and House Speaker Cathy Tilton watch. (Mark Sabbatini / Juneau Empire file photo)
Opinion: Sen. Lisa Murkowski has a job to finish

A few weeks ago, Sen. Lisa Murkowski told CNN’s Manu Raju she… Continue reading