President Donald Trump waves as he walks through the Colonnade from the Oval Office of the White House on arrival to announce a deal to temporarily reopen the government, Friday, Jan. 25, 2019, from the Rose Garden of the White House in Washington. (AP Photo | Jacquelyn Martin)

President Donald Trump waves as he walks through the Colonnade from the Oval Office of the White House on arrival to announce a deal to temporarily reopen the government, Friday, Jan. 25, 2019, from the Rose Garden of the White House in Washington. (AP Photo | Jacquelyn Martin)

Opinion: How could you allow this to go on for 35 days?

I know what it’s like to live from one paycheck to the next.

  • By Judy Crondahl
  • Tuesday, January 29, 2019 10:05am
  • OpinionTrump

Thirty-five days when essential government employees worked and did not get paid; 35 days when “non-essential” government employees did not work and did not get paid; 35 days when contract employees did not work and will never get paid.

All this because President Donald Trump promised a wall on the border for which Mexico would pay. Trump still doesn’t have his wall but it is already being paid for by federal employees and contractors through lost wages, late payment fees, lost opportunities and mental and physical stress. Taxpayers are paying employees for 35 days for which we will receive no services. Do I begrudge these employees for the pay they will now be receiving? Of course not!

[‘It’s ridiculous’: Furloughed Juneau residents frustrated at federal shutdown]

What genius businessman/real estate mogul thinks it is smart to lay off employees for 35 days knowing he will be paying them anyway? And he was willing to keep doing this for months! And is willing to do this again in 21 days! Parks have been trashed, fishing openings are delayed or uncertain, new air traffic controllers are not being trained, national forests are not being secured against another fire season, and FBI investigations are on hold; yet these and many other vital services will be paid for as if we had had a fully functioning government for the last month.

Federal employees demonstrated, lined up for free bags of groceries, and told their stories ad nauseum. That was never going to bother President “Build the Wall” Trump or Wilbur “Get a Loan” Ross. Nor was it going to end the shutdown. What bothered Trump and ended the shutdown was a “sickness” that caused TSA employees and air traffic controllers to stay home and delay flights at New York metro airports on Friday. Important people started to be inconvenienced by the shutdown. During the next shutdown, I would encourage essential employees to get sick much more quickly. The rest of us may be inconvenienced but we should all be willing to share the pain when our public employees are treated so callously. I know what it’s like to live from one paycheck to the next and anyone who works hard should not carry the burden placed on them by egomaniacal billionaires who have never experienced financial insecurity.

[‘Money-wise, I’m almost broke’: Furloughed workers in Juneau prepare for second missed paycheck]

Alaska is affected more than almost any other state because of the significant number of federal employees in our workforce. We can thank U.S. Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, for speaking out against the shutdown and for voting to reopen the government even without wall funding. U.S. Sen. Dan Sullivan, R-Alaska, said he was trying to get Coast Guard employees paid but did not vote to open the government without wall funding. Shame you, Sullivan, for trying to pit one set of your constituents against another. No thanks are due to you, Congressman Don Young, for saying and doing nothing to support your constituents during the 35 day shutdown.

The next time Trump threatens a shutdown, Alaskans should be able to expect our entire delegation to stand on our side and the side of all public employees. They work hard and deserve to be paid in full and on time. Why else are you there?


• Judy Crondahl is a Juneau resident. My Turns and Letters to the Editor represent the view of the author, not the view of the Juneau Empire.


More in Opinion

Web
Have something to say?

Here’s how to add your voice to the conversation.

U.S. Sen. Lisa Murkowski prepares to meet officials at the Sealaska Heritage Institute during a visit to Juneau in November 2022. (Mark Sabbatini / Juneau Empire File)
Juneau stands to benefit significantly from the 117th Congress

The last Congress was one of the best for our state in recent memory…

Capitol
Opinion: Humanism and the billionaire class

Compromise is the right thing to do and they should do it.

Alexander B. Dolitsky
Opinion: Neo-Marxism is a threat to the country

In the early 1980s, I attended graduate school at Brown University. Then,… Continue reading

(Clarise Larson / Juneau Empire File)
The problem with ‘Always Fighting’

What about “Always Thinking” or “Always Working” or just “Always Building Coalitions for Alaska.”

(Clarise Larson / Juneau Empire File)
Opinion: A million visitors isn’t enough. Here’s why

I’ve been thinking about Pat White’s recent My Turn, Is anyone else… Continue reading

tt
The challenged truths of three elected representatives

Last Friday, the state Supreme Court affirmed that state Rep. Jennifer Armstrong,… Continue reading

Norwegian Cruise Lines announced in late August that it would donate a 2.9 acre plot of land owned by the cruise line since 2019 on Juneau’s waterfront to Huna Totem Corporation to develop a project dubbed Aak’w Landing. (Michael S. Lockett / Juneau Empire File)
Opinion: Assembly’s dock proposal raises questions of conflict

At a Dec. 19 Committee of the Whole work session, City Manager… Continue reading

Most Read