Opinion: Ballot Measure 1 deserves our support

Ballot Measure 1 doesn’t solve all oil tax law problems, but it definitely makes it better.

  • Monday, November 2, 2020 11:45am
  • Opinion

By Ken Alper

Our current tax policy adopted under Senate Bill 21 is flawed in several respects and should be amended and improved. It’s important to say this, because I have been quoted out of context, including in a recent My Turn in the Empire, implying that I somehow oppose the “Fair Share” oil tax initiative. I think it’s appropriate and useful to discuss my role in developing Ballot Measure 1.

[Opinion: Ballot Measure 1 must be defeated]

I have extensive experience in formulating and modeling oil tax policy. From 2006 to 2014, I worked for the Legislature, and for most of that time I was the primary oil and gas aide for the House minority. Despite minority status, my bosses had substantial influence on major resource bills and I was proud to be able to help. Although legislative staff work mostly in the background, I became well known as a subject matter expert.

After the 2014 election, then-Gov. Bill Walker asked me to lead his Tax Division at the Department of Revenue. In addition to directing the work of my agency, I helped develop the governor’s revenue legislation, and carried the two successful bills that ended our paying cash for oil tax credits.

In 2018, I returned to the Legislature, but also began consulting for private clients after having cleared it with my boss and Legislative Ethics. Robin Brena and the Vote Yes group hired my firm to build a series of models to look at our historic and current oil revenues, and estimate the effect of potential tax changes. The inputs all came from publicly available data. Later, I assisted them in developing initiative language.

One of the first things we confirmed was that our current and projected North Slope revenues are historically low, whether viewed as a percentage of gross value or net profits. That’s not a judgment, it’s fact. Gross data goes back to 1977, and net data to 2007. Both show that since about 2014 we’ve been well below historic trends and averages.

Ballot Measure 1 amends SB21 in several important ways, primarily by increasing the production tax from Alaska’s largest, oldest oil fields. Prudhoe Bay is one of the world’s great oil fields. It’s on state land, it’s ours. Even at low prices, it still earns enormous profits and Alaskans deserve their share. These fields have produced many millions of barrels and have long paid back their initial investments. It also ensures that taxable profits for these fields are based on their actual costs, so producers could no longer deduct investments made in another part of the state. It restores the idea of progressivity, so during a price spike the state keeps a larger portion of profits. Finally, it makes more of a company’s filing data transparent, so Alaskans are better informed as we develop and refine our policy.

No oil tax bill is perfect, but even setting aside the money issues, the current law is technically flawed in half a dozen ways. We managed to fix some in the last few years, but the big issues remain. Ballot Measure 1 doesn’t solve them all, but it definitely makes it better.

Oil taxes are hard to talk about in Juneau. People get dug in, and the industry has a lot of influence. It’s usually taken a historic event for a major reform: the 1989 Exxon Valdez spill, or the corruption scandals of 2006. We’re facing another such moment now.

Alaska is in a fiscal crisis. Our revenue has fallen off a cliff. Despite six years of big budget cuts, we’ve run through all our savings. The Permanent Fund can help us through the transition, and can help Alaska maintain a stable economy for generations. But it’s not enough, especially if we still want a dividend. More and more Alaskans understand that there is no easy way out. We can’t just keep cutting, we can’t break the Permanent Fund. Everyone needs to contribute, and it’s irresponsible to exclude our largest industry from that conversation.

Ideally, the Legislature would have seriously addressed oil taxes as this crisis developed and we became more aware of the problems with SB21. But they didn’t, so here we are. I believe Ballot Measure 1 amends our oil tax policy and moves it forward in important ways, and it deserves our support by voting yes on Nov. 3.

• Ken Alper was Tax Division Director for the Alaska Department of Revenue from 2014-2018. Columns, My Turns and Letters to the Editor represent the view of the author, not the view of the Juneau Empire. Have something to say? Here’s how to submit a My Turn or letter.

More in Opinion

face mask
Opinion: The problem with don’t tell me what to do

Doesn’t a state need a governor, like a ship needs a captain?

Have something to say?

Here’s how to add your voice to the conversation.

The Alaska Permanent Fund Corporation building in Juneau on Thursday, October 1, 2020. (Peter Segall / Juneau Empire File)
Opinion: 5 lessons for sustaining the Permanent Fund

“…as the fund’s stewards, it is our job to equip the fund for success for decades to come.”

Opinion: Exploring lessons of the Trump Era

There’s an opportunity here to discuss issues important to both sides of the political divide.

Common Ground. Super literal.
Opinion: It’s time to find common ground

We have families, jobs, hobbies and a desire for stability and calm.

Corri A. Feige is commissioner of the Alaska Department of Natural Resources. (Courtesy Photo / DNR)
Alaska Geospatial Council helps state really ‘know where it’s at’

“Geospatial” means “location on the earth.”

Opinion: Psychiatric patients need right to appeal

By Faith Myers The Fairbanks Daily News-Miner, The Anchorage Daily News, the… Continue reading

Gov. Mike Dunleavy speaks to local leaders at the Alaska Municipal League's legislative conference in this February 2020 photo. (Peter Segall/  Juneau Empire File)
Opinion: Dunleavy needs to use his bully pulpit

For guidance, he can look to the Republican governors of Utah, North Dakota and Iowa.

Most Read