Opinion: As a seafood processor, I’m voting No on Stand for Salmon

Opinion: As a seafood processor, I’m voting No on Stand for Salmon

  • By Kevin Gullufsen Juneau Empire
  • Tuesday, September 25, 2018 9:34pm
  • OpinionOpinion

Sometimes, to understand where you’re going, you have to look back and see where you’ve been. The older I get, the more I use history to help me make better decisions for tomorrow. Today, I look at my cannery, Alaska Seafood Company; I look at Auke Bay; and I look at all that we have built in Juneau since I arrived 45 years ago. And let me tell you: most of this would not have been possible under Ballot Measure 1, the cleverly named yet misleading “Stand for Salmon” measure.

Alaska Seafood Company sits today where the old Juneau Ready Mix was. This area was a flood zone near a river — not ideal for building. Years ago, when we acquired this property, we were able to make substantial improvements that allowed us to build our operation.

Under Ballot Measure 1, you’re basically not allowed to change anything — water or land — that could cause harm to areas that could be fish habitat. That makes it pretty clear to me that had Ballot Measure 1 been in place years ago, Alaska Seafood Company would not call 5731 Concrete Way home.

But besides my small business, there is a lot of amazing infrastructure and commerce that wouldn’t be in place today under the fish habitat measure: Fred Meyer, Costco, the Egan drive over the wetlands, the airport expansion, the police station, many of our fire stations and the ferry parking lot, just to name a few.

What I’m trying to get across here is that Ballot Measure 1 is not about environmental protections. To make proposals that can enrich the environment has validity. This proposal doesn’t do that. Instead of making thoughtful improvements to existing fish habitat protections, this measure starts from ground zero and implements enough regulations to send Alaska back to the Stone Age. The people who wrote this clearly don’t know anything about the protections we already have in place.

Frankly, the Alaska Department of Fish and Game has been doing a pretty good job with habitat management. Just because our policies are old, doesn’t make them bad. How about the house you live in? I bet it has gotten old too. Look at all the beautiful historical homes in Juneau. We don’t tear them down. We upgrade them over time. And that’s what we’ve been doing since statehood with our fish management policies.

I know that’s a hard pill to swallow as we look to the low king returns this year. Yes, there are a lot of closures, and that’s part of the management system. We can’t control what happens out in the ocean, but we do what we can here in state waters and land. Everybody is taking a hit on this thing equally and it stinks. But if we let an arbitrary group of Outsiders come in, who know little about the way we manage our fish and game, we stand to lose much more.

Many fish processors go through extensive permitting with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and the Alaska Department of Fish and Game so that they can discharge guts and gills into the bay. Not a big deal. The crabs like that. So it’s no surprise that earlier this year, Pacific Seafood Processors Association stated their opposition to the measure. Yet the proponents of Ballot Measure 1 argue that this is a good decision for our fishing industry. If this measure was actually designed to increase our fish returns, don’t you think the processors would be for it?

If there were an easy solution we could do here, on land, we would have already done it. Ballot Measure 1 isn’t presenting any ideas that are going to return salmon to the rivers. Ballot Measure 1 is just a bad idea, written by people trying to oversimplify a very complicated issue.

All you have to do is look back at the past 60-plus years to see how a future with Ballot Measure 1 isn’t possible. This isn’t a left or a right argument. It’s not a developers’ argument. This is just a decision we have to make for our communities.

For my community, here in Juneau, I know the right decision. I’m voting ‘No’ on Ballot Measure 1.


• Dick Hand lives in Juneau and is the owner of Alaska Seafood Company. My Turns and Letters to the Editor represent the view of the author, not the view of the Juneau Empire.


More in Opinion

Web
Have something to say?

Here’s how to add your voice to the conversation.

Southeast Alaska LGBTQ+ Alliance Board Chair JoLynn Shriber reads a list the names of killed transgender people as Thunder Mountain High School students Kyla Stevens, center, and Laila Williams hold flags in the wind during a transgender remembrance at Marine Park on Wednesday, Nov. 20, 2019. (Michael Penn / Juneau Empire file photo)
Opinion: The toxic debate about transgender care

There are three bills related to transgender issues in public schools that… Continue reading

This rendering depicts Huna Totem Corp.’s proposed new cruise ship dock downtown that was approved for a conditional-use permit by the City and Borough of Juneau Planning Commission last July. (City and Borough of Juneau)
Opinion: Huna Totem dock project inches forward while Assembly decisions await

When I last wrote about Huna Totem Corporation’s cruise ship dock project… Continue reading

U.S. Sen. Lisa Murkowski addresses the Alaska State Legislature on Feb. 22, 2023. (Clarise Larson / Juneau Empire file photo)
My Turn: Set ANWR aside and President Biden is pro-Alaska

In a recent interview with the media, Sen. Lisa Murkowski was asked… Continue reading

(Juneau Empire file photo)
Letter: Local Veterans for Peace chapter calls for ceasefire in Gaza

The members of Veterans For Peace Chapter 100 in Southeast Alaska have… Continue reading

Alaska Senate Majority Leader Gary Stevens, prime sponsor of a civics education bill that passed the Senate last year. (Photo courtesy Alaska Senate Majority Press Office)
Opinion: A return to civility today to lieu of passing a flamed out torch

It’s almost been a year since the state Senate unanimously passed a… Continue reading

Eric Cordingley looks at his records while searching for the graves of those who died at Morningside Hospital at Multnomah Park Cemetery on Wednesday, March 13, 2024, in Portland, Ore. Cordingley has volunteered at his neighborhood cemetery for about 15 years. He’s done everything from cleaning headstones to trying to decipher obscure burial records. He has documented Portland burial sites — Multnomah Park and Greenwood Hills cemeteries — have the most Lost Alaskans, and obtained about 1,200 death certificates. (AP Photo/Jenny Kane)
My Turn: Decades of Psychiatric patient mistreatment deserves a state investigation and report

On March 29, Mark Thiessen’s story for the Associated Press was picked… Continue reading

Most Read