Gavel (Courtesy photo)

Opinion: Alaska’s judiciary — our founder’s got it right

We are writing in response to politically motivated attacks on our state judiciary…

  • By Alaskans for Fair Courts
  • Wednesday, November 2, 2022 2:30am
  • Opinion

We are writing in response to politically motivated attacks on our state judiciary that are disingenuous and misleading, threaten the fairness and integrity of Alaska’s courts, and undermine the promise of equal justice. These attacks arise in the debate over Ballot Measure 1 – whether Alaska should hold a constitutional convention – and during judicial retention elections.

Those who want a convention claim that Alaska’s constitutional provision for judicial selection and retention has resulted in judges who are not accountable to the people. This is simply not true – no state judges anywhere in the country face more intense scrutiny or higher accountability to the people they serve than Alaska’s judges. Alaskans should be fighting to protect the system that offers such transparency – not promoting destruction of this important Constitutional provision.

There will be 29 judges on the ballot this year. All have received high marks from the communities they serve, and all are unanimously recommended for retention by the Alaska Judicial Council, the non-partisan independent body charged with conducting the comprehensive, professional performance evaluations of judges standing for retention. Yet despite excellent performance evaluations, last-minute anti-retention campaigns often occur because judges have made decisions that follow the rule of law but run afoul of special interest groups that seek different outcomes.

Alaskans should be alarmed by efforts to target judges who work hard to ensure equal and impartial justice. We should not be taken in by misinformation spread by those who would like to politicize our courts.

The attacks on the Alaska’s Constitution and the attacks on individual judges have nothing to do with the failings of either. Those who put our judiciary in the crosshairs do so because theyobject to judicial decisions with which they disagree, plain and simple. They do not take this position because the judges have done anything wrong, but because the correct legal outcome is not the outcome they desire. Alaska’s system for judicial selection and retention does not need to be fixed – because it is not broken. It works exactly as our constitutional framers intended: Alaskans are being served by judges who follow the rule of law.

Those who attack Alaska’s judiciary ignore the great strengths of our system for selecting and retaining judges. The countless Alaskans who appear in court care about the same qualities our current judicial retention system evaluates: Is the judge fair and impartial? Does the judge understand and apply the law? Is the judge patient? Does the judge demonstrate respect for those who appear in their courtroom?

When you vote this year, we urge you to protect our nonpartisan system of selecting judges by voting NO on Ballot Measure 1 – no on a Constitutional Convention.

We also urge you to finish your ballot and vote YES to retain all of the judges on your ballot. You can go to to learn more about retention and view the evaluations of the judges in your community who are on the ballot. Together, we can protect the values that continue to ensure that all Alaskans – including you – have a full and fair day in court in front of a judge selected on merit and retained because of their excellent professional performance.

• This piece was submitted by Donna Goldsmith and Elaine Andrews, Co-Chairs, Alaskans for Fair Courts, and board members Niesje Steinkruger, Jim Torgerson, Debra O’Gara, Erin Jackson-Hill, Bud Carpeneti, Bruce Botelho, Barb Hood, Chuck Kopp and Tom Amodio.

More in Opinion

Have something to say?

Here’s how to add your voice to the conversation.

Sen. Dan Sullivan, R-Alaska, speaks during a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing on Capitol Hill on March 7 in Washington. (AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster)
Opinion: Sullivan’s complaints about debt ceiling deal reveal hypocrisy about government spending

Before Sen. Dan Sullivan voted against the Fiscal Responsibility Act, he praised… Continue reading

(Clarise Larson / Juneau Empire File)
Opinion: Change in city leadership brings opportunity

With current and projected turnover in city leadership, Juneau citizens might consider… Continue reading

Letter: LGBTQ+ flag at federal building was proper

LGBTQ+ flag at federal building was proper In response to Tom Dawson’s… Continue reading

Opinion: Empire disrespects the flag

Empire disrespects the flag Shame on you. I am extremely disappointed in… Continue reading

Opinion: Time to prevent the circular firing squad

Time to prevent the circular firing squad I’m developing an almost vitriolic… Continue reading

Rebuttal: Ignell ignorant about realities of Juneau’s housing market

Rebuttal: Ignell ignorant about realities of Juneau’s housing market In the few… Continue reading

Opinion: Telephone Hill homes worth preserving

Telephone Hill homes worth preserving Juneau’s history is preserved and told in… Continue reading

Opinion: Questionable property assessments by CBJ deserve a grand jury investigation

Imagine if the price of unleaded gasoline increased 20% tomorrow to $4.80… Continue reading

(Peter Segall / Juneau Empire File)
Opinion: Sustainability report is a greenwashing effort

Report leaves out “the not-so-pretty.”

(Peter Segall / Juneau Empire File)
Opinion: Considering North Douglas crossing alternatives

This new highway project will be scrutinized differently than others during the past 30 years.