Alaska

Opinion: A constitutional convention would be bad for business

  • By Laura McDonnell
  • Monday, August 22, 2022 12:19pm
  • Opinion

Every 10 years (at least) Alaskans are asked to vote on whether a constitutional convention should be called. Each time throughout history voters have overwhelmingly voted this convention down. Unlike an amendment, a constitutional convention would leave our entire constitution up for amendment simultaneously, creating massive vulnerabilities to the precedents of our governance that have been in place since the beginning of Alaska’s statehood. A convention such as this would most certainly attract well-funded organizations from outside Alaska, with radical special interest groups paying for outcomes serving their outside agendas, rather than the best future for Alaskans. With the current discussions ongoing in pursuit of a constitutional convention, some of our most treasured institutions are at risk of drastic transformation and funding elimination. Personal use hunting and fishing, public schools, the ferry system, and Alaska’s constitutional right to privacy are just a few examples of what could potentially be taken from Alaskans, drastically impacting our cherished way of life here in the greatest state.

As a small business owner, I am also concerned what passage of a constitutional convention could mean for business certainty over the next several years. A newly created constitution would be subject to years of litigation. Alaska is fortunate to have a history of settled case law associated with its current constitution but changing the constitution would open settled law to reinterpretation and re-litigation, making it difficult to make business decisions in an uncertain regulatory environment. Our current operating environment is uncertain enough after a global pandemic, record inflation, and an imminent recession, and while there is never a good time to initiate insecurity in the business environment – this is unquestionably the worst time to do so.

As resourceful and forward-thinking Alaskans, we can easily avoid this sledgehammer approach that threatens our local businesses and the way of life we have fostered here for generations. If we want to make micro changes to our constitution, we can use the surgical, analytical, single-issue amendment method, which has been used many times in our state history. I ask my fellow small business owners, parents hoping to raise their children here, neighbors seeking to preserve the Alaska they know and love, and all those with an interest in the future of Alaska to join me in voting no in November.

• Laura McDonnell is a lifelong Juneau resident and owner of Caribou Crossings, which has been locally owned operated for 25 years. Columns, My Turns and Letters to the Editor represent the view of the author, not the view of the Juneau Empire. Have something to say? Here’s how to submit a My Turn or letter.

More in Opinion

Web
Have something to say?

Here’s how to add your voice to the conversation.

(Juneau Empire File)
Opinion: Does vote-by-mail work? It’s time for a second look

Voting last week in Juneau’s “rolling” municipal election seemed more like a… Continue reading

(Juneau Empire File)
Letter: Public should ignore self-interested and cynical opponents of new City Hall

The new City Hall is an important project for Juneau. In plain… Continue reading

(Juneau Empire File)
Letter: New City Hall will bring Juneau into compliance with ADA requirements

Accessibility. Inclusion. Empowerment. Collaboration. Integrity. These are the five core values at… Continue reading

(Juneau Empire File)
Letter: Consider moving into a school rather than a new City Hall

I do not support Proposition No. 1. We have already said no… Continue reading

(Juneau Empire File)
Letter: New City Hall was needed long ago

I am pro-new City Hall. I worked for the CBJ in the… Continue reading

(Juneau Empire File)
Letter: Food for thought

As we ready ourselves to go to the polls soon, I invite… Continue reading

(Juneau Empire File)
Opinion: How not to restore public trust in government

I’ve been trying to avoid reentering the debate about City Hall. There’s… Continue reading

Most Read