My Turn: Risk of Syrian refugees is unacceptably high

  • By PETER S. GOLDBERG
  • Friday, November 20, 2015 1:03am
  • Opinion

While I am the chairman of the Alaska Republican Party, the views I am expressing are my own. I believe that they closely reflect the views of the majority of the officers of the Party, but until a more formal document is ready for release, the contents of this commentary can only be attributed to me.

I am strongly opposed to the federal government bringing any number of “Syrian refugees” to our nation’s shores, and to Alaska in particular. I put “Syrian refugees” in quotes because they’re not always coming from Syria. People without paperwork can say they come from anywhere. While there are a lot of dedicated people in several federal agencies working hard to screen refugee applicants, a process that can take up to two years, I am not convinced that our methods are adequate. Having had a top secret security clearance for 37 years and having worked as a counterintelligence agent to conduct and review the results of background investigations, I know what it takes to properly check the background of an individual.

“Biometrics” like photographing and fingerprinting, medical screening, security checks and rigorous interviews, and an additional security process for Syrian refugees — all of which are part of the federal administration’s methodology — are an inadequate method of ensuring that these people will not be a threat to America. For example, fingerprinting is a useless tool unless we have access to a fingerprint database that had an historical record of that applicant having been fingerprinted. The likelihood of finding a fingerprint record of a jihadist applying for refugee status probably approaches zero.

While I’m sure we provide extensive training to those who interview and vet refugee applicants, there is a limit to what they can corroborate. If we wanted to conduct a really thorough background investigation of people wanting to come here from the Middle East, we could not. That would require what is called human intelligence, but there is no mechanism for us to send investigators to interview people who have known the “refugees” in the past.

So I agree with FBI Director James Comey, who admitted in October at a congressional hearing that it’s currently impossible to have a record of everyone in every country. “We can only query against that which we have collected, and so if someone has never made a ripple in the pond in Syria in a way that would get their identity or their interest reflected in our database, we can query our database until the cows come home, but … nothing will show up, because we have no record of that person,” he said.

Our country has already suffered from the attacks of 9/11 and numerous other small attacks inside and outside our borders. The likelihood that persons who wish to commit terrorist acts within our borders might enter as “refugees” is unacceptably high. One of the purposes of our Constitution is to “provide for the common defence.” The President has sworn to “preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution.” Any action on the part of the executive that raises the risk to the citizens of the United States is an action contrary to that oath.

Let me be perfectly clear: I am not saying that all Muslims are bad people. To say that would be absurd. In my last overseas assignment, I was the senior intelligence officer for NATO in Kosovo, a (now independent) country that was approximately 90 percent Muslim. I had several Muslim subordinates from Turkey working for me, all good men.

The ethnically Albanian Muslim people of Kosovo were very appreciative of the United States for stopping the genocide perpetrated by their then-Serbian-controlled government. It seemed to me that there were more American flags per square mile flying in Kosovo than in the United States. I have also interacted with Muslims in Indonesia, Jordan, Egypt, Turkey and Israel, and never felt threatened. I do feel, however, that I would rather risk offending these “refugees” than risk allowing into the United States anyone who would murder my countrymen.

I agree with those who would have our government work with other predominantly Muslim countries throughout the Middle East and other places, such as Indonesia, to establish safe zones where these predominantly Muslim refugees would go. As part of our agreement to establish these safe zones, we could offer to the receiving governments food, shelters, sanitary facilities, medical care and physical security.

If those countries choose to allow the refugees to stay long term, integration into their societies would be easier because of their common religion. This approach is compassionate, but without risk to America.

• Peter S. Goldberg is the chairman of the Alaska Republican Party.

More in Opinion

Web
Have something to say?

Here’s how to add your voice to the conversation.

(Juneau Empire File)
Letter: Attorney general’s letter to libraries are an abuse of office

Earlier this month Treg Taylor, Alaska’s attorney general, published a letter to… Continue reading

An aging outhouse overlooks Tenakee Inlet. (Mark Sabbatini / Juneau Empire File)
My Turn: Murkowski’s bill will dramatically change map of public land in Southeast Alaska

There has been very little reporting on federal legislation that would greatly… Continue reading

(Photo courtesy of the City and Borough of Juneau)
Opinion: Choosing a seat at the table

To advocates for limiting cruise ship tourism and combatting climate change, partnering… Continue reading

A photo of Juneau featured on the front cover of this year’s annual “Economic Indicators and Outlook” by the Juneau Economic Development Council. (Juneau Economic Development Council)
Opinion: Troubling trends deserve Assembly attention

The economic indicators report published last month by the Juneau Economic Development… Continue reading

Passengers return to the Norwegian Sun on Oct. 25, the final day of this year’s cruise ship season in Juneau. (Mark Sabbatini / Juneau Empire File)
My Turn: “Partnering” with cruise ship industry isn’t in Juneau’s interests

Regarding Jim Powell’s lecture at the Evening at Egan event on Friday,… Continue reading

Sen. Tommy Tuberville, R-Ala., questions Navy Adm. Lisa Franchetti during a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing on Sept. 14 on Capitol Hill in Washington. (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin)
Opinion: Music to the ears of America’s adversaries

Two weeks ago, U.S. Sen. Dan Sullivan made a commendable effort to… Continue reading

(Juneau Empire File)
Letter: Thankful to see the construction by local Native organiztions

Sitting in my living room listening to nails pounding into the old… Continue reading

Fog drifts through the trees in the Tongass National Forest on Monday, Dec. 9, 2019. (Michael Penn | Juneau Empire File)
My Turn: A response to ‘There are no Landless Natives in Southeast Alaska’

Where to begin? Rebecca Knight’s — at best implicitly xenophobic and factually… Continue reading

Alaska Permanent Fund Corp. board members, staff and advisors meet Oct. 30 at the corporation’s headquarters in Juneau to discuss a proposal to raise the fund’s rate of return by making riskier investments. The idea stalled when advisors suggested the strategy and timing are ill-advised. (Mark Sabbatini / Juneau Empire File).
My Turn: Need for accounting and legislative oversight of the Permanent Fund

The governor or Legislature or both need to conduct an audit format… Continue reading

(Juneau Empire File)
Opinion: Imagine the cost of health and happiness if set by prescription drug companies

I’ve been reading more about prescription drug prices lately: How they are… Continue reading