Alaska Editorial: PFD checks shouldn’t be a budget priority

  • Wednesday, February 17, 2016 1:02am
  • Opinion

The following editorial first appeared in the Peninsula Clarion:

What’s more important, a big permanent fund dividend or more teachers in public school classrooms? How about better road maintenance, or a stronger law enforcement presence, or a fully staffed court system, or the ability for Fish and Game to conduct adequate research?

A number of budget proposals are being vetted by the Legislature, and nearly all of them have, in some form, “preserving the dividend” as a selling point. Yet just about every public agency looking at cuts that significantly impact the ability to perform its functions.

Our question is this: Does it really make sense to promise to put dollars in Alaskans’ pockets if it means every other service provided by state government is slashed?

Certainly, it’s one of those hard decisions we’ve been talking about over the past year, and the question doesn’t have an easy answer. For many Alaskans, the annual dividend check is a nice bonus, spent on vacations or flat-screen TVs or new skis. Others put their PFD check into savings, or donate a portion to nonprofit organizations. But many people rely on it as part of their income, helping to pay the bills.

However, we’re clearly past the point where the state needs help paying the bills, too. Good schools, well-maintained infrastructure, and efficient government agencies are crucial not just to Alaska’s present, but also to Alaska’s future.

As the Legislature works through the various budget proposals, there likely will be a fair amount of feedback, from the public and from individual lawmakers, not to touch the dividend, that Alaskans can spend their dividend better than the government can.

In a different fiscal climate, we might agree. But the state’s spending priorities have been and should remain education, public safety, transportation and infrastructure, and economic development. For a long time, Alaska has been able to find other ways to foot the bill, leaving money available for dividends. That’s no longer the case.

We don’t want to lose the dividend program. It provides an economic boost to our communities, and in many cases, helps Alaskans get by — but it shouldn’t be a budget priority. It doesn’t make sense to promise the annual payments if we can’t promise any of the other things that government needs to do.

More in Opinion

Web
Have something to say?

Here’s how to add your voice to the conversation.

U.S. Sen. Lisa Murkowski addresses the Alaska State Legislature on Feb. 22, 2023. (Clarise Larson / Juneau Empire file photo)
My Turn: Set ANWR aside and President Biden is pro-Alaska

In a recent interview with the media, Sen. Lisa Murkowski was asked… Continue reading

(Juneau Empire file photo)
Letter: Local Veterans for Peace chapter calls for ceasefire in Gaza

The members of Veterans For Peace Chapter 100 in Southeast Alaska have… Continue reading

Eric Cordingley looks at his records while searching for the graves of those who died at Morningside Hospital at Multnomah Park Cemetery on Wednesday, March 13, 2024, in Portland, Ore. Cordingley has volunteered at his neighborhood cemetery for about 15 years. He’s done everything from cleaning headstones to trying to decipher obscure burial records. He has documented Portland burial sites — Multnomah Park and Greenwood Hills cemeteries — have the most Lost Alaskans, and obtained about 1,200 death certificates. (AP Photo/Jenny Kane)
My Turn: Decades of Psychiatric patient mistreatment deserves a state investigation and report

On March 29, Mark Thiessen’s story for the Associated Press was picked… Continue reading

(Juneau Empire file photo)
Opinion: Alaska House makes the right decision on constitutionally guaranteed PFD

The Permanent Fund dividend is important to a lot of Alaska households,… Continue reading

Alaska Attorney General Treg Taylor in a profile picture at the Department of Law’s website. (Alaska Department of Law photo)
Dunleavy wants a state sponsored legal defense fund

On Friday, the Senate Judiciary Committee held its second hearing on a… Continue reading

Most Read