Legislature continues digging in to oil tax changes

ANCHORAGE ­— The House Resources Committee is in its second consecutive year of scrutinizing the state’s oil tax system as the Democrats now leading the committee look to implement tax changes former House and Senate Republican leaders balked at last year.

Debate on House Bill 111, the proposal introduced by Resource co-chairs Reps. Geran Tarr and Andy Josephson, both Anchorage Democrats, has not ramped up yet.

The committee instead has spent its time reviewing Alaska’s oil tax history and the fundamentals of industry taxation as there are four freshman legislators serving on House Resources.

HB 111 would end the state’s refundable tax credit program for small companies and raise production tax rates during times of lower market prices — such as now.

The legislation would appear to have a clear path through the Democrat-controlled House, but will undoubtedly face stiff opposition in the Senate.

Republican leaders in the Senate and even some in the oil industry have generally acknowledged a need to closely examine the state’s outlays for refundable tax credits, which was the focus of legislation last year. Yet, there is little appetite to change the underlying tax structure among Republican Senate majority members.

On Feb. 20 House Resources heard from Rich Ruggiero, a consultant to the Legislature and partner with Castle Group Advisors LLC, on general oil tax policy goals and what lawmakers should in-turn expect from the industry.

Ruggiero’s comments drew immediate skepticism from committee Republicans when he stated that he consulted on the crafting of Alaska’s Clear and Equitable Share, or ACES, oil tax system in 2007.

However, he qualified that by noting he advised Gov. Sarah Palin’s administration on the issue and it was the Legislature that doubled the progressivity rate of the tax first proposed by Palin.

Ruggiero mostly discounted the contention by many Republican lawmakers and oil advocates that the state will drive away business if it continues to fiddle with industry taxes. He said many other governments heavily reliant on oil revenue — though not to the level Alaska is — are also continually adjusting their tax structures.

“Alaska should not feel bad or be embarrassed that it is changing its fiscal system because the regimes around the world where the money is being spent changing their fiscal systems as often or even more often than Alaska is,” Ruggiero said, adding that instability also extends to prices, technology and other variables that impact a business climate.

Tarr noted further that several of Alaska’s recent oil tax changes have been at the behest of industry, while Rep. Dean Westlake, D-Kotzebue, emphasized that grappling with the roughly $3 billion ongoing budget deficit has thrown the whole state off-kilter.

“The State of Alaska is unstable now and it’s negatively impacting our public education, our public safety,” Westlake commented. “There are programs we absolutely do not wish to cut yet we are, so when we look at it from an Alaska business perspective and the multitude of in-kinds we do on the social side… we certainly are being negatively impacted.”

Ruggiero said further that most changes to increase taxes are done to collect additional revenue when market prices are high as opposed to the current proposals to increase taxes during a period of lower prices.

“Traditionally, most governments lessen their take at times of low price, not increase,” he said in response to a question from Rep. Chris Birch, R-Anchorage.

Any changes that are made should be done with a long-term view, he advised, and avoid measures that only serve to fill the state’s current budget deficit, which will hopefully be short-lived.

He also criticized Alaska’s current oil tax structure for its complexity of layered and field-specific tax credits; tax rates that vary depending on the region of the state; and a melded gross and progressive net profits tax for North Slope production. It all adds up to a system that is “hard to administer and even harder to audit,” Ruggiero noted.

Industry is partly to blame for not being more forthcoming with information that could help it partner with the state in crafting policy, he commented.

Instead, industry responds with vague and predictable rhetoric about the potential of lost jobs and reduced investment when tax changes are floated, Ruggiero said.

“You lack the data transparency you need to make informed decisions as a Legislature,” he said to the committee.

He urged companies to be more open and detailed about project economics and long-term plans and how various tax changes will impact them.

Absent that, what often happens is a government sets its tax rate to allow for what it views as a fair return on investment for producing fields without accounting for the failed investments or dry holes operators must factor into the economics of their successful projects, Ruggiero described.

He noted the federal Securities and Exchange Commission approved rules last year that will require resource extraction companies to disclose all payments made to the federal government for company fiscal years ending after Sept. 30, 2018. The rules are similar to what is required by Canada and the European Union, according to an SEC release.

“It’s never going to be you both mutually agree, but at least the state with what it decides to do will be coming from a position of knowledge and understanding and insight as opposed to one of guessing what’s going on based on a few reports here or there,” he said.

 


 

• Elwood Brehmer is a reporter at the Alaska Journal of Commerce and can be reached at elwood.brehmer@alaskajournal.com.

 


 

More in News

Aurora Forecast

Forecasts from the University of Alaska Fairbanks’ Geophysical Institute for the week of Feb. 5

Folks at the Alaska State Capitol openly admit to plenty of fish tales, but to a large degree in ways intended to benefit residents and sometimes even the fish. (Mark Sabbatini / Juneau Empire)
The bizarre bills other state legislatures are considering

Alaska’s Legislature isn’t mulling the headline-grabbers some statehouses have in the works.

This photo shows snow-covered hills in the Porcupine River Tundra in the Yukon Territories, Canada. In July 1997, a hunter contacted troopers in Fairbanks, Alaska, and reported finding a human skull along the Porcupine River, around 8 miles (13 kilometers) from the Canadian border. Investigators used genetic genealogy to help identify the remains as those of Gary Frank Sotherden, according to a statement Thursday, Feb. 2, 2023, from Alaska State Troopers. (AP Photo / Rick Bowmer)
Skull found in ‘97 in Interior belongs to New York man

A skull found in a remote part of Alaska’s Interior in 1997… Continue reading

(Michael Penn / Juneau Empire File)
Police calls for Saturday, Feb. 4, 2023

This report contains information from law enforcement and public safety agencies.

Officer William Hicks stands with JPD Chief Ed Mercer and Deputy Chief David Campbell during a swearing in ceremony for Hicks on Thursday at the JPD station in Lemon Creek. (Jonson Kuhn / Juneau Empire)
New officer joins JPD’s ranks

The Juneau Police Department welcomed a new officer to its ranks Thursday… Continue reading

These photos show Nova, a 3-year-old golden retriever, and the illegally placed body hold trap, commonly referred to as a Conibear trap, that caught her while walking near Outer Point Trail last week. (Courtesy / Jessica Davis)
Dog narrowly survives rare illegally placed trap in Juneau

State wildlife officials outlined what to do if found in similar situation

Gavel (Courtesy photo)
Public defender agency to refuse some cases, citing staffing

ANCHORAGE — A state agency that represents Alaskans who cannot afford their… Continue reading

(Michael Penn / Juneau Empire File)
Police: Gift card scam connected to hoax Fred Meyer threats

This article has been moved in front of the Empire’s paywall. A… Continue reading

This is a concept design drawing that was included in the request for proposal sent out by the Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities seeking outside engineering and design services to determine whether it’s feasible to build a new ferry terminal facility in Juneau at Cascade Point. (Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities)
DOT takes steps toward potential Cascade Point ferry terminal facility

It would accommodate the Tazlina and or Hubbard, shorten trips to Haines and Skagway

Most Read