Ben Hohesntatt / Juneau Empire
This photo shows a sample ballot asking whether First Judicial District judges should be retained. Based on results released Tuesday and Wednesday, voters on Election Day overwhelmingly voted for retention.

Ben Hohesntatt / Juneau Empire This photo shows a sample ballot asking whether First Judicial District judges should be retained. Based on results released Tuesday and Wednesday, voters on Election Day overwhelmingly voted for retention.

Juneau’s judges heading toward retention along large margins

Outcomes much closer in the state’s Third Judicial District.

All of the Alaska judges to appear on ballots Tuesday are trending toward retention, and all three of the Juneau judges are virtual locks to secure subsequent terms.

Superior Court Judges Amy Mead, Daniel Schally, and District Court Judge Kirsten Swanson from the First Judicial District each received over 70% of the vote to keep their positions. Like other judges on the ballot, that outcome was recommended by the Alaska Judicial Council, which unanimously recommended retention for all of Alaska’s judges in the 2022 Electoral election.

“With regards to the First Judicial District, I think it’s virtually assured that they’ll be retained. I think the judges fared well and it’s a reflection that people have confidence in their judges and our judiciary in Southeast,” said attorney and board member for the Alaskans for Fair Courts Bruce Botelho.

Outcomes are less decisive for judges in Alaska’s Third Judicial District where most votes for retention seem to be favoring retention along a narrower margin with about 55% of voters for it. Southeast Alaska, including Juneau, comprises the first district. The third district includes Anchorage, Cordova, Dillingham, Glennallen, Homer, Kenai, Kodiak, Naknek, Palmer, Sand Point, St. Paul Island, Seward, Unalaska and Valdez.

“I’d have to say that looking statewide I was troubled at the relatively close margins in the Third Judicial District,” Botelho said. “The judiciary is crucial to our Alaska democracy as it were in terms of dispensing fair and impartial justice around the state, to be able to have the credibility as an institution of being fair and impartial, to the extent that large segments of the public are voting against retention, even when there did not appear to be any issues with specific judges in terms of their conduct.”

Alaska’s method of judicial appointment is sometimes subject to criticism from people who would like to see judges determined through elections.

In Alaska, the Alaska Judicial Council —- an independent commission consisting of three attorneys, three laypeople and chaired by the state supreme court justice — screens and recommends applicants for judicial openings. Once the council recommends a pool of potential judges to fill an opening, one is appointed by the governor. The council also recommends whether voters should retain judges. According to the council, since 1976 it has recommended against retention twelve times and voters have decided not to retain six judges in the state’s history.

Botelho said that the early low projections within the Third Judicial District illustrate a disconnect with large segments of the population when considering the fact that the Alaska judicial council unanimously recommended all of the state’s judges be retained.

Executive director of the Alaska Judicial Council Susanne DiPietro said that the reason behind the council’s decision to recommend unanimous retention came from the council’s year-long evaluation process of the performance of all the judges on the 2022 ballot. DiPietro said that as required by statute, the Alaska judicial council evaluated the performance of all judges standing for retention and made that performance evaluation available to the public.

“The council does that in advance of every retention cycle, which takes about a year, it’s an exhaustive evaluation of the judge’s performance,” DiPietro said. “That evaluation includes surveys of people who appeared in front of the judges including attorneys, every law enforcement officer in the state is surveyed, jurors are surveyed, court employees are surveyed, social workers are surveyed, basically all of groups that have experience actually appearing in the judge’s court, keeping in mind that many of the people surveyed may have won their cases but many will have lost their cases.”

According to DiPietro, the council also takes into consideration judges’ financial disclosure statements that are required to be filed, as well as any ethical issues that may have arisen along with other performance indicators such as legal ability, integrity, temperament, fairness, diligence and administration skills.

“The staff assembles all of that information for the council members, and additionally offers public hearings where anyone from the public is welcome to attend and share experiences with any of the judges,” DiPietro said. “Based on all of that information compiled together the council then decides if each judge met the performance standards and should then be recommended for retention.”

Botelho said the Judicial Council unanimously recommending retention for all of Alaska’s judges is a positive reflection of Alaska’s judicial system as a whole, pointing out that some of the members on the council are divided by parties.

“I think it’s a rigorous process in addition to the polling that’s done of virtually every segment that has frequent contact with the courts, and so I think that system is sound,” Botelho said. “I think the other thing that is probably worth highlighting is that the judicial council is made up of three attorneys and three laypeople presided over by the chief justice, but two of the three lay people currently serving are appointees of Governor Dunleavy, so to the extent that there are accusations that our judiciary is too liberal or out of touch, I think there is significance of the fact that the recommendations this year in terms of retention were unanimous.”

DiPietro echoed Botelho’s sentiments regarding retention recommendations largely reflecting positively on Alaska’s judicial system, given that not everyone within the surveying process potentially agrees with one another on all other voting issues or otherwise.

“I’m certainly pleased that the performance evaluation the council did shows that thousands of people who have direct professional experience with the judges rated them highly in all areas,” DiPietro said. “To me, that goes, really, to a positive impression of the quality of Alaska’s judiciary. The people that the council surveyed are people who may very well not agree with each other on anything but they all pretty much agreed that the judges were doing a good job.”

• Contact reporter Jonson Kuhn at jonson.kuhn@juneauempire.com.

More in News

The Norwegian Bliss arrives in Juneau on Monday, April 14, 2025. (Jasz Garrett / Juneau Empire file photo)
Ships in port for the week of May 11

This information comes from the Cruise Line Agencies of Alaska’s 2024 schedule.… Continue reading

Boxes of sugary cereal, including those from General Mills, fill a store’s shelves on April 16, 2025, in Miami, Florida. (Joe Raedle/Getty Images)
US House Republican plan would force states to pay for a portion of SNAP benefits

State costs would increase with higher error rates — Alaska currently has the highest.

Juneau Board of Education members including Will Muldoon (foreground), whose seat is currently open after he resigned April 21, meet at Thunder Mountain Middle School on Sept. 10, 2024. Five candidates for the open seat are scheduled to be interviewed on Saturday at TMMS. (Mark Sabbatini / Juneau Empire file photo)
Five people seeking open seat on Juneau school board set for public interviews on Saturday at TMMS

Former board member Steve Whitney, recent runner-up candidate Jenny Thomas among applicants.

Jörg Knorr, a solo travel journalist from Flensburg, Germany, smiles after taking a photo on Sunday, May 11, 2025. (Jasz Garrett / Juneau Empire)
German kayaker sets off to circumnavigate Admiralty Island

He made friends along the way in his mission to see Alaska.

A cruise ship docks in downtown Juneau on April 30, 2025. (Mark Sabbatini / Juneau Empire file photo)
As foreign tourists stay away, US could lose $12.5 billion this year, tourism group says

Border detentions, confusion over visas deterring visitors, according to World Travel & Tourism Council.

Phase One of the HESCO barriers ends in the backyard of this residence on Rivercourt Way on Monday, May 12, 2025. The next extension, Phase One A, will install the barriers along the river adjacent to Dimond Park from the end of Rivercourt Way, interconnecting through a gap in the back fence. (Jasz Garrett / Juneau Empire)
Juneau Assembly approves extending HESCO barriers

After reviewing flood-fighting inundation maps, additional short-term mitigation deemed necessary.

House Majority Leader Chuck Kopp (R-Anchorage), right, presents an overview of a bill reviving pensions for public employees during a House floor session Monday, May 12, 2025. (Mark Sabbatini / Juneau Empire)
House passes bill reviving pensions for public employees, Senate expected to consider it next year

Supporters say it avoids pitfalls in previous system nixed in 2006 due to multibillion-dollar shortfall.

Members of the Alaska Senate watch the votes for and against Senate Bill 26 on Monday, May 12, 2025, in Juneau. (James Brooks/Alaska Beacon)
Alaska senators vote to end daylight saving time, ask feds to put state on Pacific Standard Time

Alaska would be on the same time zone as Seattle for four months of the year is bill becomes law.

(Michael Penn / Juneau Empire file photo)
Police calls for Sunday, May 11, 2025

This report contains public information from law enforcement and public safety agencies.

Most Read