Ben Hohesntatt / Juneau Empire
This photo shows a sample ballot asking whether First Judicial District judges should be retained. Based on results released Tuesday and Wednesday, voters on Election Day overwhelmingly voted for retention.

Ben Hohesntatt / Juneau Empire This photo shows a sample ballot asking whether First Judicial District judges should be retained. Based on results released Tuesday and Wednesday, voters on Election Day overwhelmingly voted for retention.

Juneau’s judges heading toward retention along large margins

Outcomes much closer in the state’s Third Judicial District.

All of the Alaska judges to appear on ballots Tuesday are trending toward retention, and all three of the Juneau judges are virtual locks to secure subsequent terms.

Superior Court Judges Amy Mead, Daniel Schally, and District Court Judge Kirsten Swanson from the First Judicial District each received over 70% of the vote to keep their positions. Like other judges on the ballot, that outcome was recommended by the Alaska Judicial Council, which unanimously recommended retention for all of Alaska’s judges in the 2022 Electoral election.

“With regards to the First Judicial District, I think it’s virtually assured that they’ll be retained. I think the judges fared well and it’s a reflection that people have confidence in their judges and our judiciary in Southeast,” said attorney and board member for the Alaskans for Fair Courts Bruce Botelho.

Outcomes are less decisive for judges in Alaska’s Third Judicial District where most votes for retention seem to be favoring retention along a narrower margin with about 55% of voters for it. Southeast Alaska, including Juneau, comprises the first district. The third district includes Anchorage, Cordova, Dillingham, Glennallen, Homer, Kenai, Kodiak, Naknek, Palmer, Sand Point, St. Paul Island, Seward, Unalaska and Valdez.

“I’d have to say that looking statewide I was troubled at the relatively close margins in the Third Judicial District,” Botelho said. “The judiciary is crucial to our Alaska democracy as it were in terms of dispensing fair and impartial justice around the state, to be able to have the credibility as an institution of being fair and impartial, to the extent that large segments of the public are voting against retention, even when there did not appear to be any issues with specific judges in terms of their conduct.”

Alaska’s method of judicial appointment is sometimes subject to criticism from people who would like to see judges determined through elections.

In Alaska, the Alaska Judicial Council —- an independent commission consisting of three attorneys, three laypeople and chaired by the state supreme court justice — screens and recommends applicants for judicial openings. Once the council recommends a pool of potential judges to fill an opening, one is appointed by the governor. The council also recommends whether voters should retain judges. According to the council, since 1976 it has recommended against retention twelve times and voters have decided not to retain six judges in the state’s history.

Botelho said that the early low projections within the Third Judicial District illustrate a disconnect with large segments of the population when considering the fact that the Alaska judicial council unanimously recommended all of the state’s judges be retained.

Executive director of the Alaska Judicial Council Susanne DiPietro said that the reason behind the council’s decision to recommend unanimous retention came from the council’s year-long evaluation process of the performance of all the judges on the 2022 ballot. DiPietro said that as required by statute, the Alaska judicial council evaluated the performance of all judges standing for retention and made that performance evaluation available to the public.

“The council does that in advance of every retention cycle, which takes about a year, it’s an exhaustive evaluation of the judge’s performance,” DiPietro said. “That evaluation includes surveys of people who appeared in front of the judges including attorneys, every law enforcement officer in the state is surveyed, jurors are surveyed, court employees are surveyed, social workers are surveyed, basically all of groups that have experience actually appearing in the judge’s court, keeping in mind that many of the people surveyed may have won their cases but many will have lost their cases.”

According to DiPietro, the council also takes into consideration judges’ financial disclosure statements that are required to be filed, as well as any ethical issues that may have arisen along with other performance indicators such as legal ability, integrity, temperament, fairness, diligence and administration skills.

“The staff assembles all of that information for the council members, and additionally offers public hearings where anyone from the public is welcome to attend and share experiences with any of the judges,” DiPietro said. “Based on all of that information compiled together the council then decides if each judge met the performance standards and should then be recommended for retention.”

Botelho said the Judicial Council unanimously recommending retention for all of Alaska’s judges is a positive reflection of Alaska’s judicial system as a whole, pointing out that some of the members on the council are divided by parties.

“I think it’s a rigorous process in addition to the polling that’s done of virtually every segment that has frequent contact with the courts, and so I think that system is sound,” Botelho said. “I think the other thing that is probably worth highlighting is that the judicial council is made up of three attorneys and three laypeople presided over by the chief justice, but two of the three lay people currently serving are appointees of Governor Dunleavy, so to the extent that there are accusations that our judiciary is too liberal or out of touch, I think there is significance of the fact that the recommendations this year in terms of retention were unanimous.”

DiPietro echoed Botelho’s sentiments regarding retention recommendations largely reflecting positively on Alaska’s judicial system, given that not everyone within the surveying process potentially agrees with one another on all other voting issues or otherwise.

“I’m certainly pleased that the performance evaluation the council did shows that thousands of people who have direct professional experience with the judges rated them highly in all areas,” DiPietro said. “To me, that goes, really, to a positive impression of the quality of Alaska’s judiciary. The people that the council surveyed are people who may very well not agree with each other on anything but they all pretty much agreed that the judges were doing a good job.”

• Contact reporter Jonson Kuhn at jonson.kuhn@juneauempire.com.

More in News

Jasmine Chavez, a crew member aboard the Quantum of the Seas cruise ship, waves to her family during a cell phone conversation after disembarking from the ship at Marine Park on May 10. (Mark Sabbatini / Juneau Empire file photo)
Ships in port for the week of June 8

Here’s what to expect this week.

Bill Thomas, a former Republican state representative from Haines, announced Friday he is dropping out of the race for the District 3 House seat this fall. (U.S. Sustainability Alliance photo)
Bill Thomas drops out of District 3 House race, says there isn’t time for fishing and campaigning

Haines Republican cites rough start to commercial season; incumbent Andi Story now unopposed.

U.S. Rep. Mary Peltola, D-Alaska, speaks at the Alaska Democratic Party’s state convention on May 18 at Elizabeth Peratrovich Hall. (Mark Sabbatini / Juneau Empire file photo)
Peltola among few Democrats to vote for annual defense bill loaded with GOP ‘culture war’ amendments

Alaska congresswoman expresses confidence “poison pills” will be removed from final legislation.

A celebratory sign stands outside Goldbelt Inc.’s new building during the Alaska Native Regional Corporation’s 50th-anniversary celebration on Jan. 4. (Mark Sabbatini / Juneau Empire file photo)
Medical company sues Goldbelt for at least $30M in contract dispute involving COVID-19 vaccine needles

Company says it was stuck with massive stock of useless needles due to improper specs from Goldbelt.

(Michael Penn / Juneau Empire file photo)
Police calls for Wednesday, June 12, 2024

This report contains public information from law enforcement and public safety agencies.

A yearling black bear waits for its mother to return. Most likely she won’t. This time of year juvenile bears are separated, sometimes forcibly, by their mothers as families break up during mating season. (Photo courtesy K. McGuire)
Bearing witness: Young bears get the boot from mom

With mating season for adults underway, juveniles seek out easy food sources in neighborhoods.

A chart shows COVID-19 pathogen levels at the Mendenhall wastewater treatment plant during the past three months. (Data from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s National Wastewater Surveillance System)
Juneau seeing another increase in COVID-19 cases, but a scarcity of self-test kits

SEARHC, Juneau Drug have limited kits; other locations expect more by Saturday.

Gov. Mike Dunleavy speaks to reporters during a news conference Feb. 7. (James Brooks/Alaska Beacon)
Gov. Dunleavy picks second ex-talk radio host for lucrative fish job after first rejected

Rick Green will serve at least through Legislature’s next confirmation votes in the spring of 2025.

A used gondola being installed at Eaglecrest Ski Area may not begin operating until 2027, according to Goldbelt Inc. President and CEO McHugh Pierre, whose company is providing $10 million for installation costs. (Eaglecrest Ski Area photo)
Eaglecrest Ski Area gondola may not open until 2027 due to CBJ delays, Goldbelt CEO says

Agreement with city allows Goldbelt to nix $10M deal if gondola doesn’t open by May 31, 2028.

Most Read