A map shows the former downtown shelter operated by The Glory Hall is in a high-risk landslide/avalanche zone, according to an analysis updated this year. The building on South Franklin Street is located almost directly below homes on Gastineau Street that were damaged or destroyed by a landslide during a heavy rainstorm at the end of September. (Juneau Community Development Department)

Downtown Glory Hall housing proposal gets new rejection

Landslide that destroyed homes above former homeless shelter adds to questions about project’s safety

The Glory Hall is yet again facing city officials urging a rejection of a year-old proposal to turn the homeless program’s former downtown shelter into low-income housing – but this time new findings are being raised due to last month’s landslide on a hillside almost directly above the building that destroyed or damaged three homes on Gastineau Avenue.

Converting the former shelter at 247 S. Franklin St. to housing is both dangerous and a violation of applicable ordinances because it is in a landslide/avalanche hazard zone, according to a report released Monday by Juneau’s Community Development Department.

The Sept. 26 landslide’s occurrence and resulting damage is referred in a section of the 331-page report assessing historic and current hazard zones in the area, but not specifically referred to in a list of CDD findings summarizing why they recommend rejection of the project.

“The development of a multi-family dwelling in a Mapped Severe Landslide and Avalanche Hazard Area would put residents, including some of the most vulnerable members of the community, in a Mapped Severe Landslide and Avalanche Hazard Zone,” one of the findings states.

It’s an objection the department has stated since the project was first evaluated last October, with the Planning Commission subsequently rejecting the department’s position twice and ordering staff to help the Glory Hall obtain a conditional use permit.

Instead, the matter and many of the same arguments are on the commission’s agenda next Tuesday.

“I still think it’s an absurd and crazy reasoning which I hope the Planning Commission will disagree with,” said Mary Alice McKeen, an attorney representing the Glory Hall pro bono.

The proposal would convert the former shelter, which could house up to 53 people, into seven apartments able to house a total of 14 people. Initially the CDD also questioned the residential density in the building, but that has been resolved.

Both CDD and the Glory Hall have reiterated their stances on whether the building truly is in a hazard zone, presenting extensive historic and statutory documentation dating back more than three decades to support their positions. The Planning Commission, which most recently heard the matter in August, has stated CDD erred in its interpretation of applicable ordinances.

McKeen said if the commission wants to impose conditions for converting the building, including any resulting from concerns raised by last month’s landslide, the Glory Hall is willing to try to meet them. But her objection is CDD’s recommendation for a flat-out denial of the project.

“The question is what can we do with the building?” she said. “We believe that housing people there is the best use of that building.”

Sixteen people offering public comment to CDD between Sept. 22 and Oct. 3 all supported granting the Glory Hall a conditional use permit.

McKeen said she doesn’t believe the latest CDD objection or Tuesday’s meeting will differ much in arguments presented from previous sessions — but in terms of administrative procedure The Glory Hall is facing a setback.

“I don’t think there’s really anything new,” she said. However, “the Planning Commission withdrew its prior findings so they have to begin this anew.”

Another potential complication is there are three members of the commission not involved in previous hearings, including a chairperson who was out of town during the most recent hearing, a member who recused herself previously and a new member, McKeen said. Because of that and due to the volume of the city development department’s objection the commission may delay a decision on the matter until a future meeting.

Among the frustrations with the revolving door of CDD rejections and Planning Commission hearings is the building could have been converted and the new apartments occupied by the beginning of this July if the process had gone smoothly from the start, McKeen said. Now in addition to the bureaucratic barriers the costs and difficulties presented by other factors are piling up.

“I don’t know how soon work can start because of winter or because of contractors or because of supplies,” she said.

• Contact Mark Sabbatini at mark.sabbatini@juneauempire.com

More in News

The Aurora Borealis glows over the Mendenhall Glacier in 2014. (Michael Penn / Juneau Empire File)
Aurora forecast

Forecasts from the University of Alaska Fairbanks’ Geophysical Institute for the week of Dec. 3

This photo shows an Alaska State Trooper patrol vehicle (Juneau Empire File)
Troopers: Man killed raven, consumed its tongue

No arrests or citations made at this time, but investigation is underway.

t
Writers’ Weir: A window into the sea

A nonfiction story by Rodger Painter.

Kéet and Oscar wait patiently to play on the beach in winter in Wrangell. (Vivian Faith Prescott / For the Capital City Weekly)
Planet Alaska: Winter words

Phrases and words to use to create a Lingít language immersion outing in the winter.

(Michael Penn / Juneau Empire File)
Police calls for Wednesday, Dec. 7

This report contains information from law enforcement and public safety agencies.

Gavel (Courtesy Photo / Juneau Empire file)
Judicial appointments announced

Three of the four presiding Superior Court judges have been reappointed, outgoing… Continue reading

Male harlequins earn their name with their patchwork colors. (Courtesy Photo / Bob Armstrong)
On the Trails: The colorful world of harlequins

On a cold, windy day in late November, I wandered out to… Continue reading

Most Read