Archives
Amid the collective anxiety provoked by North Korea's alleged nuclear test, I received a note from a former student who recently ventured to the Nevada Test Site, the primary testing location for American atomic bombs from 1951 to 1992.
My turn: The dark side of nuclear ambition 101606 opinion 1 JuneauEmpire Amid the collective anxiety provoked by North Korea's alleged nuclear test, I received a note from a former student who recently ventured to the Nevada Test Site, the primary testing location for American atomic bombs from 1951 to 1992.

My turn: The dark side of nuclear ambition

America's history with nuclear weapons doesn't bode well for others

Amid the collective anxiety provoked by North Korea's alleged nuclear test, I received a note from a former student who recently ventured to the Nevada Test Site, the primary testing location for American atomic bombs from 1951 to 1992.

Print This
E-Mail This
Send editor a comment
Sound off on the important issues at
After describing some of the model homes built during the 1950s to measure the effects of a blast on Main Street, she explained that "several concrete and steel cages" were also placed near ground zero. "They used rats and mice," she wrote, "because of their rapid reproductive rate to see possible genetic effects. They said they used dogs, too, but didn't say why. And they also used pigs because their skin is similar to human skin. They dressed the pigs in soldiers' uniforms to see if their uniforms would provide any protection. Some of the cages were made of glass so that they could see what shards of glass would do to the pigs."

My former student is only beginning to discover the horrors of the nuclear landscape. Shredded, irradiated pigs aside, the region around the site remains one of the most devastated terrains in the United States, with at least 12 billion curies of radiation having been released into the air and soil through atmospheric and underground nuclear events. In 1959 alone, the Air Force staged at least eight reactor meltdowns in Utah, with total radiation outputs that exceeded - 14 times over - that of the Three Mile Island accident.

Moreover, in New Mexico as many as 244 "simulated" nuclear tests were conducted in the vicinity of Native American and Hispanic communities during the 1940s and 1950s. These radiolanthanum (RaLa) tests were only performed when winds were blowing away from Los Alamos, where thousands of white professionals labored on behalf of the Cold War. Affected communities were not told of the tests beforehand and were never advised that soil, air and water contamination would linger for years.

The American Indian populations who reside in this landscape have born the weight of these tests. Throughout the Cold War, the mining and milling of uranium took place in the Navajoan desert, on lands traditionally occupied by Navajo, Hopi, Pueblo and Ute peoples. Additional ancestral lands have been withdrawn from Western Shoshone, Southern Paiute and other communities to construct the nuclear West, including the Nevada Test Site. Other facilities such as Los Alamos and White Sands are adjacent to Pueblo and Apache land. The disposal of high- and low-level waste has been centered on reservation land held by Mescalero Apache, Skull Valley Goshute and San Ildefonso Pueblo, among other tribes.

Open-air radiation tests were accompanied throughout the Cold War by institutional research conducted with breathtaking disregard for human dignity. In 1994, the Clinton administration created the Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments to document the history of deliberate radiation releases. The final report, published in October 1995, was a depressing catalogue of moral lapses by medical professionals, Department of Energy scientists, officials at the Department of Defense and other federal entities. From 1944 to 1974, unethical experiments were routinely conducted on a variety of groups including soldiers, prisoners, disabled children and Alaska Natives, scores of whose thyroids were intentionally destroyed with iodine-131 in 1956 and 1957 for the absurd purpose of studying how humans acclimate to cold temperatures. Participants in these and other experiments were never adequately informed about the purposes and possible effects of the research.

Participants in the Alaska study earned $10 each. Prisoners in Washington and Oregon received $25 (plus an additional $25 for submitting to vasectomies after the tests were complete). When lawsuits were filed on their behalf during the 1970s, nine plaintiffs eventually shared $2,215 in damages.

Americans are used to pondering the effects of a nuclear weapon, which we usually imagine being lobbed at us from afar. We are less accustomed to thinking of the United States as a danger to itself. Some people, in these uncertain days, claim that the world's most dangerous regimes cannot be trusted with the world's most dangerous weapons. Reflecting on this history, I can only agree.

• David Hoogland Noon is an assistant professor of history at the University of Alaska Southeast in Juneau.


ARTICLE LINKS: Printer Friendly Version| Email This Article| Commenting Policy

AP Video and News

Updated 6:15 AM ET
Levees hold but waters rise in Dolly's rains
House committee probes medically unfit truckers
Obama in Europe in effort to burnish foreign cache
Killings turn focus on San Francisco sanctuary law
AP IMPACT: Fatal MRAP accidents prompt warnings
Pittsburgh cancer center warns of cell phone risks
Visa survey shows foreign travel remains popular
More News

Classifieds






Top Jobs

Loading...

Top Homes

Loading...

Top Rentals

Loading...

Top Boats

Loading...

Top Autos

Loading...
Labor Day 08 Celebration 08 Graduation 08
Activote 08



News
Share
Shop
Life
Visit