My turn: Award winners leave out key info about life with paralysis
Both of these movies should have been made, and perhaps even won these prestigious awards, because they spark discussion on difficult issues, something rare in movie- making today. However, both movies leave out key information, showing negative aspects of paralysis but not the real lives of persons who have successfully adapted to their lives as quadriplegics using modern-day technology.
Thirty years ago, a decision for assisted suicide had more validity. Society was not accessible to people with disabilities of any kind. Just 40 years ago, we were not allowed in the public schools and 75 years ago, persons with disabilities were begging for food on the streets, hence the word handicapped, or "cap in hand."
Today, it is a different era. Adaptive technology has improved incredibly. Many buildings and sidewalks are accessible. And, thanks to the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, more than 600 Centers for Independent Living (including Southeast Alaska Independent Living here in Juneau) provide resources, options, choices, and a vital community to people with all kinds of disabilities. In 2005, there are so many more choices allowing people dignity and full control over their lives.
Eastwood's film offers an electric wheelchair, controlled by a puff straw, to the main character. The character was still lying in a nursing home bed, having no hope for a future life; a life that could have included a wheelchair-accessible van controlled by a puff straw, a life with a fully accessible house where all appliances are controlled by similar devices, a life with a personal assistant paid for by insurance. Eastwood did not offer this future to the character or the audience. If he had, the movie would have moved beyond the emotional impact it created of fear and pity, and shown a resolve and inner strength he denied the boxer by killing her character and ending the movie.
|
|
Million-Dollar Baby also encouraged pity towards a character with a cognitive disability. During several scenes where this character made socially inappropriate comments or questions, the audience at the showing I attended laughed at him and then pitied him as another boxer beat him up. We tell our children not to laugh or hurt people who are different from us, yet this audience laughed at and pitied this character in the movie.
While we have come a long way as Americans toward acceptance of persons with disabilities, we have not conquered the emotions of pity and fear of loss of control. Parents still hope their children will be born physically "perfect" and older Americans fear disability, because they believe it will limit their lives. This is not true because of the progress made in 40 years. The greatest barriers to persons with disabilities are attitudinal ones that hinder employment and friendship. Could Americans fear disability because they believe others hold the same prejudices they feel toward persons with disabilities?
Watch these films. Talk about them at the dinner table. But realize they only show half-truths regarding disability in the 21st century. An independent life in your own community is available for those who experience disability, but only if society and the individual choose it.
Kevin Gadsey works as an independent living specialist for Southeast Alaska Independent Living, graduated from the University of Southern Indiana with a degree in journalism and experiences disability in the form of Arthrogryposis Multiplex Congenita.
News
Share
Shop
Life
Visit























